Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
mini-swe-agent vs Paseo
Paseo scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against mini-swe-agent's 59 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. mini-swe-agent leads on reliability. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 1500 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Benchmark runs, research baselines and RL or fine-tuning pipelines that want a minimal, readable agent with a linear trajectory, and for people who want to read every line of their harness.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 65 against 50
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
The default local environment runs commands on the host with no isolation and the full host environment
Paseo B
Best for Developers who want parallel coding agents on their own machines with no telemetry, reachable from anywhere.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 65 against 58
- Maintenance & community, 75 against 32
- Transparency & trust, 68 against 56
Watch for
Pre-1.0, at 0.15.3
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Maintenance & community Paseo +43
mini-swe-agent 32
2.4.6 on PyPI on 2026-07-23, 104 days before this check, and still the newest tag (10). No release in the 90 days to 4 November (0). Main hasn't moved since 3 September (three commits since 23 July, one from pre-commit-ci). Outside fixes were merged within days through July, but no pull request has been merged since #917 (17 August), 77 of the 85 pull requests numbered after it still carry open merge refs on the git remote, and maintainer reply times couldn't be read; the 18 October shields.io counts are struck (5). The Python library ships in the same package as the CLI and is current (10). Dependabot and pre-commit-ci run, and CI workflows exist with their current state unconfirmed (7).
Paseo 75
v0.15.3 and commits on 7 November 2026 (30). More than three releases in 90 days (20). GitHub issues and pull requests weren't read (GitHub's pages refuse these sessions), so that line is scored absent (0). Current builds (15). CI on push (10). 30 + 20 + 0 + 15 + 10 = 75.
Reliability mini-swe-agent +15
mini-swe-agent 65
Read as a local package, graded on 2.4.6, the release pip install mini-swe-agent installs, and still the newest tag on 4 November 2026. One official PyPI package with Python 3.10 or newer stated (20). A pytest workflow runs on every push to main with Podman, bubblewrap and Apptainer installed, 41 test files and Codecov coverage, but GitHub's pages refused this run, so whether main passes is unconfirmed (15). Issue counts and types couldn't be read (the 18 October counts came from shields.io, a third-party copy, and are struck). The git remote shows outside bug fixes merged through 22 July, such as #915, #896 and #886, and nothing merged into main since apart from a pre-commit update on 17 August, while 77 of the 85 pull requests numbered after #917 still carry open merge refs (10). Versions follow semver and v2's breaking changes came with a migration guide, but there's no changelog file and tags carry only a version bump (8). 2.4.6, past 1.0, though the PyPI classifier still says 3 - Alpha (12).
Paseo 50
Local software. Desktop builds, an Android APK, a Docker image and a Nix package (20). ci.yml on the repository; pass state not read (15). GitHub issues and pull requests weren't read (GitHub's pages refuse these sessions), so that line is scored absent (0). CHANGELOG.md (15). Version 0.15.3 (0). 20 + 15 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 50.
Transparency & trust Paseo +12
mini-swe-agent 56
MIT (30). No privacy policy, terms or data-handling statement, though the tool runs locally and collects nothing we could find (8). A v2 migration guide marks the breaking changes, says how to pin mini-swe-agent~=1.0, and keeps v1 docs and a v1 branch, but there's no deprecation policy or end date for v1 (10). No telemetry in the source, but the docs don't say so (14).
Paseo 68
Apache 2.0 for everything but third-party components (30). No telemetry and agents run on your machine (22 of 30). CHANGELOG.md, no deprecation policy (10). States no telemetry (20). 30 + 22 + 10 + 20 = 82.
Schema & documentation Paseo +7
mini-swe-agent 58
Framework reading. Typed pydantic config classes, typed protocols for agents, models and environments, py.typed, a mkdocstrings API reference and a documented trajectory format, but no machine-readable spec for configs or output (15). No llms.txt (/latest/llms.txt and /llms.txt returned 404). The docs are Markdown in the repository, readable raw, though they rely on build-time includes (3). The FAQ and environments page say when to pick mini over SWE-agent and which environment isolates, but the FAQ still says it doesn't use tool calls while the v2 guide says tool calls are now the default (12). Modes are a typed Literal and limits are typed fields, while model_kwargs passes free-form to LiteLLM (10). Hello-world and cookbook examples, a model troubleshooting page and a partial list of exit statuses (11). A dated v2 migration guide and kept v1 docs, with release notes only on GitHub, which we couldn't read (7).
Paseo 65
Harness reading. Public docs, a CLI and plugin examples in the repository (65).
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | mini-swe-agent | Paseo | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 50 | mini-swe-agent +15 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 58 | 65 | Paseo +7 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 70 | Paseo +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 58 | 58 | even |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 32 | 75 | Paseo +43 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 56 | 68 | Paseo +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 59/100 | B 62.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | mini-swe-agent | Paseo |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | SWE-bench team (Princeton and Stanford) | Mohamed Boudra |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-23 | 2026-11-07 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Popularity | 8.6k stars, 4.4M PyPI/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
Paseo
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
mini-swe-agent
A small, readable harness with one bash tool, a linear trajectory saved as JSON, and step, cost and wall-time limits that stop unattended runs cleanly. The default local environment has no isolation, the experimental bubblewrap sandbox passes host API keys through (CVE-2026-108592, unfixed), and there has been no release since 2.4.6 on 23 July 2026.
Paseo
A self-hosted, open-source workspace for running many coding agents on your own machines, scriptable from the CLI and reachable from phone, web or desktop, with no telemetry or forced log-in. It's pre-1.0 and run largely by one maintainer.
Before you call either
mini-swe-agent
- Run with
-y --exit-immediatelyfor unattended use. Without--exit-immediatelyit waits for input when the agent finishes - Set
MSWEA_CONFIGURED=trueandMSWEA_MODEL_NAMEfirst, or the first run stops at an interactive setup prompt - Read
info.exit_statusin the-otrajectory file. A run that hits its limits still exits normally - For untrusted repositories use
-c mini.yaml -c environment.environment_class=docker -c environment.image=<image>. The local and bubblewrap environments both expose host variables - Strip model keys from the environment commands see, since the local environment passes every host variable to each command
Paseo
- Run the daemon on the machine that has your tools and credentials, and connect from the clients
- Script runs from the CLI for repeatable agent jobs
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, mini-swe-agent or Paseo?
Paseo scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against mini-swe-agent's 59 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. mini-swe-agent leads on reliability.
Are mini-swe-agent and Paseo open source?
Yes. mini-swe-agent is open source (MIT). Paseo is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with mini-swe-agent or Paseo
- Agent Zero vs mini-swe-agent
- Agent Zero vs Paseo
- Aider vs mini-swe-agent
- Aider vs Paseo
- Amp vs mini-swe-agent
- Amp vs Paseo
- Antigravity CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Antigravity CLI vs Paseo
- Auggie CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Auggie CLI vs Paseo
- AXLR vs mini-swe-agent
- AXLR vs Paseo
- Claude Code vs mini-swe-agent
- Claude Code vs Paseo
- Cline vs mini-swe-agent
- Cline vs Paseo
- Conductor vs mini-swe-agent
- Conductor vs Paseo
- Crush vs mini-swe-agent
- Crush vs Paseo
- Cursor CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Cursor CLI vs Paseo
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs mini-swe-agent
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Paseo
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs mini-swe-agent
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Paseo
- Devin vs mini-swe-agent
- Devin vs Paseo
- Droid CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Droid CLI vs Paseo
- Pi vs mini-swe-agent
- Pi vs Paseo
- Emdash vs mini-swe-agent
- Emdash vs Paseo
- Gemini CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Gemini CLI vs Paseo
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Paseo
- goose vs mini-swe-agent
- goose vs Paseo
- Harness² vs mini-swe-agent
- Harness² vs Paseo
- HarnessRouter vs mini-swe-agent
- HarnessRouter vs Paseo
- Jules vs mini-swe-agent
- Jules vs Paseo
- Junie CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Junie CLI vs Paseo
- Kilo Code CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kilo Code CLI vs Paseo
- Kimi Code CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kimi Code CLI vs Paseo
- Kiro CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kiro CLI vs Paseo
- Letta vs mini-swe-agent
- Letta vs Paseo
- mini-swe-agent vs MiniMax Code
- mini-swe-agent vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Muse Code
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenAI Agents API
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenAI Codex
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenCode
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenHands
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenMausBot
- mini-swe-agent vs Orca
- mini-swe-agent vs Prime Agent
- mini-swe-agent vs Qoder CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Qwen Code
- mini-swe-agent vs Mirror CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Rovo Dev CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Sculptor
- mini-swe-agent vs T3 Code
- mini-swe-agent vs Traycer
- mini-swe-agent vs Unstoppable
- mini-swe-agent vs Verdent
- mini-swe-agent vs Vibe-Trading
- mini-swe-agent vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- MiniMax Code vs Paseo
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Paseo
- Muse Code vs Paseo
- OpenAI Agents API vs Paseo
- OpenAI Codex vs Paseo
- OpenCode vs Paseo
- OpenHands vs Paseo
- Orca vs Paseo
- Paseo vs Prime Agent
- Paseo vs Qoder CLI
- Paseo vs Qwen Code
- Paseo vs Mirror CLI
- Paseo vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Paseo vs Sculptor
- Paseo vs T3 Code
- Paseo vs Traycer
- Paseo vs Unstoppable
- Paseo vs Verdent
- Paseo vs Vibe-Trading
- Paseo vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Clawboo vs Paseo
- CLI Manager vs Paseo
- Harness vs Paseo
- OpenMausBot vs Paseo
- Paperclip vs Paseo
- Parallax vs Paseo
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/mini-swe-agent-vs-paseo.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/mini-swe-agent.json·/api/v1/tools/paseo.json - From a terminal
anchor compare mini-swe-agent paseo(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "mini-swe-agent", "b": "paseo"}at/mcp, no key