Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
mini-swe-agent vs Qwen Code
Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against mini-swe-agent's 56.7 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Benchmark runs, research baselines and RL or fine-tuning pipelines that want a minimal, readable agent with a linear trajectory, and for people who want to read every line of their harness.
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
The default local environment runs commands on the host with no isolation and the full host environment
Qwen Code BB
Best for Developers and CI jobs that want an open-source harness tied to no single model vendor, with run budgets and SDKs.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 91 against 58
- Agent ergonomics, 85 against 69
- Maintenance & community, 88 against 49
- Transparency & trust, 63 against 51
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- No incidents deducted, where mini-swe-agent loses 4 points for them
Watch for
The default approval mode is Auto, where an LLM classifier approves tool calls, and sandboxing and folder trust are both off by default
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | mini-swe-agent | Qwen Code | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 69 | mini-swe-agent +1 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 58 | 91 | Qwen Code +33 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 85 | Qwen Code +16 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 56 | 53 | mini-swe-agent +3 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 49 | 88 | Qwen Code +39 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 51 | 63 | Qwen Code +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -4 | 0 | |
| Total | C 56.7/100 | BB 72.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | mini-swe-agent | Qwen Code |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | SWE-bench team (Princeton and Stanford) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-07-23 | 2026-10-05 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-10-01 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 8.6k stars, 4.4M PyPI/wk | 28k stars, 105k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
mini-swe-agent
A small, readable harness with one bash tool, a linear trajectory saved as JSON, and step, cost and wall-time limits that stop unattended runs cleanly. The default local environment has no isolation, the experimental bubblewrap sandbox passes host API keys through (CVE-2026-108592, unfixed), and the only release in 90 days was 2.4.6 on 23 July 2026.
Qwen Code
Apache-2.0 with no account of its own, any OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini-compatible endpoint, and headless runs bounded by turn, tool-call and wall-time budgets with distinct exit codes. Out of the box, Auto mode lets an LLM classifier approve tool calls, with the sandbox and folder trust both off. Usage statistics are on by default.
Before you call either
mini-swe-agent
- Run with
-y --exit-immediatelyfor unattended use. Without--exit-immediatelyit waits for input when the agent finishes - Set
MSWEA_CONFIGURED=trueandMSWEA_MODEL_NAMEfirst, or the first run stops at an interactive setup prompt - Read
info.exit_statusin the-otrajectory file. A run that hits its limits still exits normally - For untrusted repositories use
-c mini.yaml -c environment.environment_class=docker -c environment.image=<image>. The local and bubblewrap environments both expose host variables - Strip model keys from the environment commands see, since the local environment passes every host variable to each command
Qwen Code
- Pass
--approval-modeon every run. The settings default isauto, and one docs page says headless runs default to asking, so don't rely on either - Add
--max-session-turns,--max-wall-timeand--max-tool-calls. All three are unlimited by default. Exit 53 is the turn limit and 55 a budget --yolodoesn't turn on a sandbox. Add--sandbox, or on Linux settools.executionSandboxwithnetworkset toclosed- Set
QWEN_USAGE_STATISTICS_ENABLED=falseto stop usage statistics - Authenticate with
OPENAI_API_KEY,OPENAI_BASE_URLandOPENAI_MODELin CI. The browser sign-in is discontinued
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, mini-swe-agent or Qwen Code?
Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against mini-swe-agent's 56.7 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories.
Are mini-swe-agent and Qwen Code open source?
Yes. mini-swe-agent is open source (MIT). Qwen Code is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with mini-swe-agent or Qwen Code
- Agent Zero vs mini-swe-agent
- Agent Zero vs Qwen Code
- Aider vs mini-swe-agent
- Aider vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs mini-swe-agent
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Antigravity CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Antigravity CLI vs Qwen Code
- Auggie CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Auggie CLI vs Qwen Code
- Claude Code vs mini-swe-agent
- Claude Code vs Qwen Code
- Cline vs mini-swe-agent
- Cline vs Qwen Code
- Crush vs mini-swe-agent
- Crush vs Qwen Code
- Cursor CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Cursor CLI vs Qwen Code
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs mini-swe-agent
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Qwen Code
- Devin vs mini-swe-agent
- Devin vs Qwen Code
- Droid CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Droid CLI vs Qwen Code
- Pi vs mini-swe-agent
- Pi vs Qwen Code
- Gemini CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Gemini CLI vs Qwen Code
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Qwen Code
- goose vs mini-swe-agent
- goose vs Qwen Code
- Harness² vs mini-swe-agent
- Harness² vs Qwen Code
- HarnessRouter vs mini-swe-agent
- HarnessRouter vs Qwen Code
- Jules vs mini-swe-agent
- Jules vs Qwen Code
- Junie CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Junie CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kilo Code CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kilo Code CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kimi Code CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kiro CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kiro CLI vs Qwen Code
- mini-swe-agent vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Muse Code
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenAI Codex
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenCode
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenHands
- mini-swe-agent vs Prime Agent
- mini-swe-agent vs Qoder CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Mirror CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Rovo Dev CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Qwen Code
- Muse Code vs Qwen Code
- OpenAI Codex vs Qwen Code
- OpenCode vs Qwen Code
- OpenHands vs Qwen Code
- Prime Agent vs Qwen Code
- Qoder CLI vs Qwen Code
- Qwen Code vs Mirror CLI
- Qwen Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qwen Code vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs Qwen Code
- Harness vs Qwen Code
- Paperclip vs Qwen Code
- Parallax vs Qwen Code
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/mini-swe-agent-vs-qwen-code.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/mini-swe-agent.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen-code.json - From a terminal
anchor compare mini-swe-agent qwen-code(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "mini-swe-agent", "b": "qwen-code"}at/mcp, no key