Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Qwen Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Rovo Dev CLI's 43.9 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Qwen Code BB
Best for Developers and CI jobs that want an open-source harness tied to no single model vendor, with run budgets and SDKs.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 69 against 35
- Schema & documentation, 91 against 45
- Agent ergonomics, 85 against 53
- Security & auth, 53 against 48
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 15
- Maintenance & community, 88 against 61
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 2.0 out of 5
Watch for
The default approval mode is Auto, where an LLM classifier approves tool calls, and sandboxing and folder trust are both off by default
Best for Teams already on Jira, Confluence and Bitbucket who want the agent to read and update work items and pages from the terminal or a pipeline.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Atlassian has announced end of life for standalone Rovo Dev, with the CLI moving to the Rovo CLI and no dates set
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Qwen Code | Rovo Dev CLI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 69 | 35 | Qwen Code +34 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 91 | 45 | Qwen Code +46 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 85 | 53 | Qwen Code +32 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 53 | 48 | Qwen Code +5 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 15 | Qwen Code +45 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 88 | 61 | Qwen Code +27 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 63 | 61 | Qwen Code +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | BB 72.4/100 | E 43.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Qwen Code | Rovo Dev CLI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Alibaba (Qwen team) | Atlassian |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary, under the Atlassian Customer Agreement (effective 1 October 2026) and the Atlassian AI Terms (effective 17 August 2026). No source is published |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-05 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 28k stars, 105k npm/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Qwen Code
Apache-2.0 with no account of its own, any OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini-compatible endpoint, and headless runs bounded by turn, tool-call and wall-time budgets with distinct exit codes. Out of the box, Auto mode lets an LLM classifier approve tool calls, with the sandbox and folder trust both off. Usage statistics are on by default.
Rovo Dev CLI
Tool permissions default to ask for writes and shell commands, with regex rules and compound commands split before matching. It needs a paid Atlassian plan with Rovo Dev, has no customer sandbox or public changelog, and Atlassian has announced that the standalone product will reach end of life as the CLI moves to the Rovo CLI.
Before you call either
Qwen Code
- Pass
--approval-modeon every run. The settings default isauto, and one docs page says headless runs default to asking, so don't rely on either - Add
--max-session-turns,--max-wall-timeand--max-tool-calls. All three are unlimited by default. Exit 53 is the turn limit and 55 a budget --yolodoesn't turn on a sandbox. Add--sandbox, or on Linux settools.executionSandboxwithnetworkset toclosed- Set
QWEN_USAGE_STATISTICS_ENABLED=falseto stop usage statistics - Authenticate with
OPENAI_API_KEY,OPENAI_BASE_URLandOPENAI_MODELin CI. The browser sign-in is discontinued
Rovo Dev CLI
- Pass the instruction as an argument to
acli rovodev runfor a single non-interactive run. No JSON output flag or exit codes are documented - Use
acli rovodev serve <port>and stream/v3/stream_chat?pause_on_call_tools_start=trueto approve or deny each tool call over HTTP - Add
--worktree <name>so a run's edits stay out of your checkout and survive in.rovodev/worktrees/<name> - Set
"enable_instructions": falseon MCP servers you don't trust, since server instructions go into the system prompt by default - Check
/usagebefore long runs. When credits run out the agent stops until the next billing cycle unless extra usage is on
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Qwen Code or Rovo Dev CLI?
Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Rovo Dev CLI's 43.9 (E), and leads in every scored category.
Are Qwen Code and Rovo Dev CLI open source?
Qwen Code is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Rovo Dev CLI.
Other comparisons with Qwen Code or Rovo Dev CLI
- Agent Zero vs Qwen Code
- Agent Zero vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Aider vs Qwen Code
- Aider vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Qwen Code
- Antigravity CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Qwen Code
- Auggie CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Claude Code vs Qwen Code
- Claude Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Cline vs Qwen Code
- Cline vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Crush vs Qwen Code
- Crush vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Cursor CLI vs Qwen Code
- Cursor CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Qwen Code
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Devin vs Qwen Code
- Devin vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Droid CLI vs Qwen Code
- Droid CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Pi vs Qwen Code
- Pi vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Gemini CLI vs Qwen Code
- Gemini CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Qwen Code
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- goose vs Qwen Code
- goose vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Harness² vs Qwen Code
- Harness² vs Rovo Dev CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Qwen Code
- HarnessRouter vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Jules vs Qwen Code
- Jules vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Junie CLI vs Qwen Code
- Junie CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kilo Code CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kilo Code CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kiro CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kiro CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Qwen Code
- mini-swe-agent vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Qwen Code
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Muse Code vs Qwen Code
- Muse Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenAI Codex vs Qwen Code
- OpenAI Codex vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenCode vs Qwen Code
- OpenCode vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenHands vs Qwen Code
- OpenHands vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Prime Agent vs Qwen Code
- Prime Agent vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qoder CLI vs Qwen Code
- Qoder CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qwen Code vs Mirror CLI
- Qwen Code vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Mirror CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Rovo Dev CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs Qwen Code
- CLI Manager vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Harness vs Qwen Code
- Harness vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Paperclip vs Qwen Code
- Paperclip vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Parallax vs Qwen Code
- Parallax vs Rovo Dev CLI
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/qwen-code-vs-rovo-dev-cli.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/qwen-code.json·/api/v1/tools/rovo-dev-cli.json - From a terminal
anchor compare qwen-code rovo-dev-cli(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "qwen-code", "b": "rovo-dev-cli"}at/mcp, no key