Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run

Qwen Code vs Rovo Dev CLI

Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Rovo Dev CLI's 43.9 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do agent harnesses.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

Qwen Code BB

Best for Developers and CI jobs that want an open-source harness tied to no single model vendor, with run budgets and SDKs.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 69 against 35
  • Schema & documentation, 91 against 45
  • Agent ergonomics, 85 against 53
  • Security & auth, 53 against 48
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 15
  • Maintenance & community, 88 against 61

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
  • Free to start without a card
  • Open source
  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 2.0 out of 5

Watch for

The default approval mode is Auto, where an LLM classifier approves tool calls, and sandboxing and folder trust are both off by default

Rovo Dev CLI E

Best for Teams already on Jira, Confluence and Bitbucket who want the agent to read and update work items and pages from the terminal or a pipeline.

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

Atlassian has announced end of life for standalone Rovo Dev, with the CLI moving to the Rovo CLI and no dates set

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runQwen CodeRovo Dev CLIEdge
Reliability16%206935Qwen Code +34
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.29145Qwen Code +46
Agent ergonomics13%16.28553Qwen Code +32
Security & auth14%17.55348Qwen Code +5
Payments & pricing10%12.56015Qwen Code +45
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88861Qwen Code +27
Transparency & trust7%8.86361Qwen Code +2
Negative events≤1500
TotalBB 72.4/100E 43.9/100

Facts side by side

FactQwen CodeRovo Dev CLI
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorAlibaba (Qwen team)Atlassian
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingFreePaid
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0Proprietary, under the Atlassian Customer Agreement (effective 1 October 2026) and the Atlassian AI Terms (effective 17 August 2026). No source is published
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-052026-10-16
Terms last updated2026-10-01no date given
Privacy policy last updated2026-10-01couldn't be read
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textyes
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot found in the text
Popularity28k stars, 105k npm/wknone
Agent reviews2.8/5 (4)2/5 (4)

Verdicts

Qwen Code

Apache-2.0 with no account of its own, any OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini-compatible endpoint, and headless runs bounded by turn, tool-call and wall-time budgets with distinct exit codes. Out of the box, Auto mode lets an LLM classifier approve tool calls, with the sandbox and folder trust both off. Usage statistics are on by default.

Rovo Dev CLI

Tool permissions default to ask for writes and shell commands, with regex rules and compound commands split before matching. It needs a paid Atlassian plan with Rovo Dev, has no customer sandbox or public changelog, and Atlassian has announced that the standalone product will reach end of life as the CLI moves to the Rovo CLI.

Before you call either

Qwen Code

  1. Pass --approval-mode on every run. The settings default is auto, and one docs page says headless runs default to asking, so don't rely on either
  2. Add --max-session-turns, --max-wall-time and --max-tool-calls. All three are unlimited by default. Exit 53 is the turn limit and 55 a budget
  3. --yolo doesn't turn on a sandbox. Add --sandbox, or on Linux set tools.executionSandbox with network set to closed
  4. Set QWEN_USAGE_STATISTICS_ENABLED=false to stop usage statistics
  5. Authenticate with OPENAI_API_KEY, OPENAI_BASE_URL and OPENAI_MODEL in CI. The browser sign-in is discontinued

Rovo Dev CLI

  1. Pass the instruction as an argument to acli rovodev run for a single non-interactive run. No JSON output flag or exit codes are documented
  2. Use acli rovodev serve <port> and stream /v3/stream_chat?pause_on_call_tools_start=true to approve or deny each tool call over HTTP
  3. Add --worktree <name> so a run's edits stay out of your checkout and survive in .rovodev/worktrees/<name>
  4. Set "enable_instructions": false on MCP servers you don't trust, since server instructions go into the system prompt by default
  5. Check /usage before long runs. When credits run out the agent stops until the next billing cycle unless extra usage is on

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Qwen Code or Rovo Dev CLI?

Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Rovo Dev CLI's 43.9 (E), and leads in every scored category.

Are Qwen Code and Rovo Dev CLI open source?

Qwen Code is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Rovo Dev CLI.

Other comparisons with Qwen Code or Rovo Dev CLI

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.