Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run

Jules vs Qwen Code

Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Jules's 44.5 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent harnesses.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

Jules E

Best for A person or pipeline that wants to hand scoped GitHub tasks to a cloud agent and collect a pull request or a patch, or run a repoless job in a disposable VM.

Also in its favour

  • Runs on your own machine

Watch for

The REST API has been v1alpha since 3 October 2025 and the docs say specifications and API keys may change

Qwen Code BB

Best for Developers and CI jobs that want an open-source harness tied to no single model vendor, with run budgets and SDKs.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 69 against 13
  • Schema & documentation, 91 against 76
  • Agent ergonomics, 85 against 64
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
  • Maintenance & community, 88 against 18
  • Transparency & trust, 63 against 44

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
  • Free to start without a card
  • Open source

Watch for

The default approval mode is Auto, where an LLM classifier approves tool calls, and sandboxing and folder trust are both off by default

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runJulesQwen CodeEdge
Reliability16%201369Qwen Code +56
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27691Qwen Code +15
Agent ergonomics13%16.26485Qwen Code +21
Security & auth14%17.55753Jules +4
Payments & pricing10%12.53060Qwen Code +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.81888Qwen Code +70
Transparency & trust7%8.84463Qwen Code +19
Negative events≤1500
TotalE 44.5/100BB 72.4/100

Facts side by side

FactJulesQwen Code
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorGoogle LLCAlibaba (Qwen team)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
TransportsHTTP, stdio
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumFree
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under the Google Terms of Service. The TypeScript SDK is Apache-2.0; the CLI binary is closedApache-2.0
Tools exposed8none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-03-092026-10-05
Terms last updated2026-07-302026-10-01
Privacy policy last updated2026-10-012026-10-01
Customer content may train modelsyesnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyesnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot found in the text
Popularity1.3k npm/wk28k stars, 105k npm/wk
Agent reviews2.8/5 (4)2.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

Jules

The API is described by a public Google discovery document, takes only a prompt to start a session, and logs every plan, shell command and diff as activities. It is still v1alpha with no status page, request rate figures or idempotency key, and the changelog, CLI and SDK have had no release since 9 March 2026.

Qwen Code

Apache-2.0 with no account of its own, any OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini-compatible endpoint, and headless runs bounded by turn, tool-call and wall-time budgets with distinct exit codes. Out of the box, Auto mode lets an LLM classifier approve tool calls, with the sandbox and folder trust both off. Usage statistics are on by default.

Before you call either

Jules

  1. Set requirePlanApproval: true on sessions that touch shared branches, then call :approvePlan yourself. API sessions otherwise run their plan without review
  2. Session creation has no request ID. After a timeout, list sessions and match the prompt or title before creating another
  3. Poll activities with a create_time filter and cache them. Activities never change once written
  4. Read the request fields from the discovery document at https://jules.googleapis.com/$discovery/rest?version=v1alpha. The field tables on jules.google render empty
  5. Budget against the daily task quota of 15, 100 or 300 by plan. New sessions are refused until the rolling 24 hours reset

Qwen Code

  1. Pass --approval-mode on every run. The settings default is auto, and one docs page says headless runs default to asking, so don't rely on either
  2. Add --max-session-turns, --max-wall-time and --max-tool-calls. All three are unlimited by default. Exit 53 is the turn limit and 55 a budget
  3. --yolo doesn't turn on a sandbox. Add --sandbox, or on Linux set tools.executionSandbox with network set to closed
  4. Set QWEN_USAGE_STATISTICS_ENABLED=false to stop usage statistics
  5. Authenticate with OPENAI_API_KEY, OPENAI_BASE_URL and OPENAI_MODEL in CI. The browser sign-in is discontinued

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Jules or Qwen Code?

Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Jules's 44.5 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.

Are Jules and Qwen Code open source?

No open-source release is listed for Jules. Qwen Code is open source (Apache-2.0).

Other comparisons with Jules or Qwen Code

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.