Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Jules vs Qwen Code
Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Jules's 44.5 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Jules E
Best for A person or pipeline that wants to hand scoped GitHub tasks to a cloud agent and collect a pull request or a patch, or run a repoless job in a disposable VM.
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
The REST API has been v1alpha since 3 October 2025 and the docs say specifications and API keys may change
Qwen Code BB
Best for Developers and CI jobs that want an open-source harness tied to no single model vendor, with run budgets and SDKs.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 69 against 13
- Schema & documentation, 91 against 76
- Agent ergonomics, 85 against 64
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 88 against 18
- Transparency & trust, 63 against 44
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
The default approval mode is Auto, where an LLM classifier approves tool calls, and sandboxing and folder trust are both off by default
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Jules | Qwen Code | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 13 | 69 | Qwen Code +56 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 76 | 91 | Qwen Code +15 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 64 | 85 | Qwen Code +21 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 53 | Jules +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 60 | Qwen Code +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 18 | 88 | Qwen Code +70 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 44 | 63 | Qwen Code +19 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | E 44.5/100 | BB 72.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Jules | Qwen Code |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Google LLC | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under the Google Terms of Service. The TypeScript SDK is Apache-2.0; the CLI binary is closed | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | 8 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-03-09 | 2026-10-05 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-30 | 2026-10-01 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 1.3k npm/wk | 28k stars, 105k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Jules
The API is described by a public Google discovery document, takes only a prompt to start a session, and logs every plan, shell command and diff as activities. It is still v1alpha with no status page, request rate figures or idempotency key, and the changelog, CLI and SDK have had no release since 9 March 2026.
Qwen Code
Apache-2.0 with no account of its own, any OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini-compatible endpoint, and headless runs bounded by turn, tool-call and wall-time budgets with distinct exit codes. Out of the box, Auto mode lets an LLM classifier approve tool calls, with the sandbox and folder trust both off. Usage statistics are on by default.
Before you call either
Jules
- Set
requirePlanApproval: trueon sessions that touch shared branches, then call:approvePlanyourself. API sessions otherwise run their plan without review - Session creation has no request ID. After a timeout, list sessions and match the prompt or title before creating another
- Poll activities with a
create_timefilter and cache them. Activities never change once written - Read the request fields from the discovery document at https://jules.googleapis.com/$discovery/rest?version=v1alpha. The field tables on jules.google render empty
- Budget against the daily task quota of 15, 100 or 300 by plan. New sessions are refused until the rolling 24 hours reset
Qwen Code
- Pass
--approval-modeon every run. The settings default isauto, and one docs page says headless runs default to asking, so don't rely on either - Add
--max-session-turns,--max-wall-timeand--max-tool-calls. All three are unlimited by default. Exit 53 is the turn limit and 55 a budget --yolodoesn't turn on a sandbox. Add--sandbox, or on Linux settools.executionSandboxwithnetworkset toclosed- Set
QWEN_USAGE_STATISTICS_ENABLED=falseto stop usage statistics - Authenticate with
OPENAI_API_KEY,OPENAI_BASE_URLandOPENAI_MODELin CI. The browser sign-in is discontinued
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Jules or Qwen Code?
Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Jules's 44.5 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Are Jules and Qwen Code open source?
No open-source release is listed for Jules. Qwen Code is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Jules or Qwen Code
- Agent Zero vs Jules
- Agent Zero vs Qwen Code
- Aider vs Jules
- Aider vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs Jules
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Antigravity CLI vs Jules
- Antigravity CLI vs Qwen Code
- Auggie CLI vs Jules
- Auggie CLI vs Qwen Code
- Claude Code vs Jules
- Claude Code vs Qwen Code
- Cline vs Jules
- Cline vs Qwen Code
- Crush vs Jules
- Crush vs Qwen Code
- Cursor CLI vs Jules
- Cursor CLI vs Qwen Code
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Jules
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Qwen Code
- Devin vs Jules
- Devin vs Qwen Code
- Droid CLI vs Jules
- Droid CLI vs Qwen Code
- Pi vs Jules
- Pi vs Qwen Code
- Gemini CLI vs Jules
- Gemini CLI vs Qwen Code
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Jules
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Qwen Code
- goose vs Jules
- goose vs Qwen Code
- Harness² vs Jules
- Harness² vs Qwen Code
- HarnessRouter vs Jules
- HarnessRouter vs Qwen Code
- Jules vs Junie CLI
- Jules vs Kilo Code CLI
- Jules vs Kimi Code CLI
- Jules vs Kiro CLI
- Jules vs mini-swe-agent
- Jules vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Jules vs Muse Code
- Jules vs OpenAI Codex
- Jules vs OpenCode
- Jules vs OpenHands
- Jules vs Prime Agent
- Jules vs Qoder CLI
- Jules vs Mirror CLI
- Jules vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Jules vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Junie CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kilo Code CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kiro CLI vs Qwen Code
- mini-swe-agent vs Qwen Code
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Qwen Code
- Muse Code vs Qwen Code
- OpenAI Codex vs Qwen Code
- OpenCode vs Qwen Code
- OpenHands vs Qwen Code
- Prime Agent vs Qwen Code
- Qoder CLI vs Qwen Code
- Qwen Code vs Mirror CLI
- Qwen Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qwen Code vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs Jules
- CLI Manager vs Qwen Code
- Harness vs Jules
- Harness vs Qwen Code
- Jules vs Paperclip
- Jules vs Parallax
- Paperclip vs Qwen Code
- Parallax vs Qwen Code
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/jules-vs-qwen-code.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/jules.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen-code.json - From a terminal
anchor compare jules qwen-code(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "jules", "b": "qwen-code"}at/mcp, no key