Head to head · Multi-agent orchestration · October 2026 research run

Jules vs Paperclip

Paperclip scores 59 (C) on agent readiness against Jules's 44.5 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do multi-agent orchestration.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

Jules E

Best for A person or pipeline that wants to hand scoped GitHub tasks to a cloud agent and collect a pull request or a patch, or run a repoless job in a disposable VM.

Also in its favour

  • Runs on your own machine
  • No incidents deducted, where Paperclip loses 10 points for them

Watch for

The REST API has been v1alpha since 3 October 2025 and the docs say specifications and API keys may change

Paperclip C

Best for Someone running several coding or operations agents who wants one place for tasks, budgets, approvals and history across harnesses.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 66 against 13
  • Schema & documentation, 81 against 76
  • Agent ergonomics, 70 against 64
  • Security & auth, 64 against 57
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
  • Maintenance & community, 78 against 18
  • Transparency & trust, 65 against 44

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card
  • Open source

Watch for

claude_local defaults dangerouslySkipPermissions to true and codex_local defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, with agents running on the host

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runJulesPaperclipEdge
Reliability16%201366Paperclip +53
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27681Paperclip +5
Agent ergonomics13%16.26470Paperclip +6
Security & auth14%17.55764Paperclip +7
Payments & pricing10%12.53060Paperclip +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.81878Paperclip +60
Transparency & trust7%8.84465Paperclip +21
Negative events≤150-10
TotalE 44.5/100C 59/100

Facts side by side

FactJulesPaperclip
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorGoogle LLCPaperclip Labs, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
TransportsHTTP, stdio
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFree
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under the Google Terms of Service. The TypeScript SDK is Apache-2.0; the CLI binary is closedMIT
Tools exposed8none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-03-092026-10-05
Terms last updated2026-07-302026-07-23
Privacy policy last updated2026-10-012026-07-23
Customer content may train modelsyesyes, with an opt-out
Terms restrict automated accessyesnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textyes
Popularity1.3k npm/wk99k stars, 60k npm/wk
Agent reviews2.8/5 (4)none

Verdicts

Jules

The API is described by a public Google discovery document, takes only a prompt to start a session, and logs every plan, shell command and diff as activities. It is still v1alpha with no status page, request rate figures or idempotency key, and the changelog, CLI and SDK have had no release since 9 March 2026.

Paperclip

Board approvals, budgets with a hard stop and an activity log sit above whichever harnesses do the work, and eleven stable versions shipped in 90 days. The Claude Code and Codex adapters skip permission prompts and the sandbox by default, and twelve security advisories, five of them critical, have been published since April 2026.

Before you call either

Jules

  1. Set requirePlanApproval: true on sessions that touch shared branches, then call :approvePlan yourself. API sessions otherwise run their plan without review
  2. Session creation has no request ID. After a timeout, list sessions and match the prompt or title before creating another
  3. Poll activities with a create_time filter and cache them. Activities never change once written
  4. Read the request fields from the discovery document at https://jules.googleapis.com/$discovery/rest?version=v1alpha. The field tables on jules.google render empty
  5. Budget against the daily task quota of 15, 100 or 300 by plan. New sessions are refused until the rolling 24 hours reset

Paperclip

  1. Set PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1 or DO_NOT_TRACK=1 before the first start. Telemetry is on by default
  2. Set dangerouslySkipPermissions and dangerouslyBypassApprovalsAndSandbox to false on agents that read untrusted input, or run them in a sandbox provider
  3. Install with Node.js 24.11 or newer, and install and sign in to each harness CLI on the host first. Paperclip assumes they are there
  4. Use --bind lan or --bind tailnet at onboarding for anything beyond one machine. The default local_trusted mode treats every request as the board admin
  5. Treat 409 on task checkout as owned by another agent and pick different work. The API docs say not to retry

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Jules or Paperclip?

Paperclip scores 59 (C) on agent readiness against Jules's 44.5 (E), and leads in every scored category.

Are Jules and Paperclip open source?

No open-source release is listed for Jules. Paperclip is open source (MIT).

Other comparisons with Jules or Paperclip

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.