Head to head · Agent multi agent · October 2026 research run

Cline vs Paperclip

Cline scores 60.4 (C) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on security & auth and payments & pricing. Both do agent multi agent.

Which one, for what

Cline C

Good for Developers who want an agent inside VS Code or JetBrains that asks before acting and can roll back, with the same engine in a CLI.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 80 against 66
  • Maintenance & community, 85 against 78

Watch for

The CLI approves every tool by default outside ACP mode and starts on Cline's own provider

Paperclip C

Good for Someone running several coding or operations agents who wants one place for tasks, budgets, approvals and history across harnesses.

Ahead on

  • Security & auth, 64 against 57
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 50

Watch for

claude_local defaults dangerouslySkipPermissions to true and codex_local defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, with agents running on the host

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runClinePaperclipEdge
Reliability16%208066Cline +14
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27781Paperclip +4
Agent ergonomics13%16.26770Paperclip +3
Security & auth14%17.55764Paperclip +7
Payments & pricing10%12.55060Paperclip +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88578Cline +7
Transparency & trust7%8.86165Paperclip +4
Negative events≤15-8-10
Total60.4 · C59 · C

Facts side by side

FactClinePaperclip
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorCline Bot Inc.Paperclip Labs, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-012026-10-05
Terms last updated2025-09-252026-07-23
Privacy policy last updated2025-09-242026-07-23
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textyes, with an opt-out
Terms restrict automated accessyesnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyesnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyesnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waiveryesyes
Popularity68k stars99k stars, 60k npm/wk
Agent reviews2/5 (2)none

Verdicts

Cline

Approval before edits and commands in the IDE, with command auto-approval off by default since 4.0.0. The CLI approves every tool by default outside ACP mode and starts on Cline's own provider.

Paperclip

Board approvals, budgets with a hard stop and an activity log sit above whichever harnesses do the work, and eleven stable versions shipped in 90 days. The Claude Code and Codex adapters skip permission prompts and the sandbox by default, and twelve security advisories, five of them critical, have been published since April 2026.

Before you call either

Cline

  1. Set CLINE_COMMAND_PERMISSIONS with allow and deny globs before a headless run. The CLI approves every tool by default
  2. Pick a provider with -P and a key, or run cline auth. The default provider needs a Cline sign-in
  3. Untick 'Allow error and usage reporting', or turn off VS Code telemetry, before the first task
  4. Pin the CLI version. 2.3.0 was a malicious publish
  5. Keep the hub on 127.0.0.1 or set ROOM_SECRET, and run 3.0.30 or later

Paperclip

  1. Set PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1 or DO_NOT_TRACK=1 before the first start. Telemetry is on by default
  2. Set dangerouslySkipPermissions and dangerouslyBypassApprovalsAndSandbox to false on agents that read untrusted input, or run them in a sandbox provider
  3. Install with Node.js 24.11 or newer, and install and sign in to each harness CLI on the host first. Paperclip assumes they are there
  4. Use --bind lan or --bind tailnet at onboarding for anything beyond one machine. The default local_trusted mode treats every request as the board admin
  5. Treat 409 on task checkout as owned by another agent and pick different work. The API docs say not to retry

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Cline or Paperclip?

Cline scores 60.4 (C) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on security & auth and payments & pricing.

Are Cline and Paperclip open source?

Yes. Cline is open source (Apache-2.0). Paperclip is open source (MIT).

Other comparisons with Cline or Paperclip

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.