Head to head · Multi-agent orchestration · October 2026 research run

Cline vs Harness

Cline and Harness score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 60.4 (C) and 60.3 (C). Harness leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics and transparency & trust. Both do multi-agent orchestration.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 331 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

Cline C

Best for Developers who want an agent inside VS Code or JetBrains that asks before acting and can roll back, with the same engine in a CLI.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 80 against 35
  • Payments & pricing, 50 against 40
  • Maintenance & community, 85 against 60

Watch for

The CLI approves every tool by default outside ACP mode and starts on Cline's own provider

Harness C

Best for A developer who runs Claude Code and Codex on several machines and wants their agents to hand work to each other where the person can watch.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 85 against 77
  • Agent ergonomics, 82 against 67
  • Transparency & trust, 68 against 61

Also in its favour

  • Runs on your own machine
  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.0 out of 5
  • No incidents deducted, where Cline loses 8 points for them

Watch for

Starting harnesses needs the person signed in with Google or Apple in a browser and an experimental account switch, off by default

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runClineHarnessEdge
Reliability16%208035Cline +45
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27785Harness +8
Agent ergonomics13%16.26782Harness +15
Security & auth14%17.55757even
Payments & pricing10%12.55040Cline +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88560Cline +25
Transparency & trust7%8.86168Harness +7
Negative events≤15-80
TotalC 60.4/100C 60.3/100

Facts side by side

FactClineHarness
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorCline Bot Inc.Autonomous, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transportsstdio
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth
PricingFreemiumFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Tools exposednone7
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-012026-10-17
Terms last updated2025-09-25
Privacy policy last updated2025-09-24
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticeyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes
Popularity68k stars1.3k stars
Agent reviews2/5 (2)3/5 (4)

Verdicts

Cline

Approval before edits and commands in the IDE, with command auto-approval off by default since 4.0.0. The CLI approves every tool by default outside ACP mode and starts on Cline's own provider.

Harness

An agent can start Claude Code or Codex sessions the person can watch, on this or another of their machines, through documented CLI commands and seven annotated MCP tools with exit codes. Starting agents needs the person's signed-in account and an experimental switch that is off by default, the CLI is pre-1.0, and usage counts are shared by default.

Before you call either

Cline

  1. Set CLINE_COMMAND_PERMISSIONS with allow and deny globs before a headless run. The CLI approves every tool by default
  2. Pick a provider with -P and a key, or run cline auth. The default provider needs a Cline sign-in
  3. Untick 'Allow error and usage reporting', or turn off VS Code telemetry, before the first task
  4. Pin the CLI version. 2.3.0 was a malicious publish
  5. Keep the hub on 127.0.0.1 or set ROOM_SECRET, and run 3.0.30 or later

Harness

  1. Run harness whoami first. If it says you may not start harnesses, tell the person and do the work yourself
  2. Ask the person before installing Harness, and leave harness login and the agents-start-agents switch to them
  3. Treat exit 5 as final and do not retry. Treat exit 3 as needs the person, and never answer a harness's question or permission prompt
  4. Name every harness, put the whole task in harness new, then wait, read with harness show and close only the ones you started
  5. Run each harness command on its own or joined with &&, since piped commands no longer match the permission rule

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Cline or Harness?

Cline and Harness score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 60.4 (C) and 60.3 (C). Harness leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics and transparency & trust.

Are Cline and Harness open source?

Yes. Cline is open source (Apache-2.0). Harness is open source (MIT).

Other comparisons with Cline or Harness

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.