Head to head · Multi-agent orchestration · October 2026 research run
Antigravity CLI vs Harness
Harness scores 60.3 (C) on agent readiness against Antigravity CLI's 57.4 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Antigravity CLI leads on reliability and maintenance & community. Both do multi-agent orchestration.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 331 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Developers on Google AI plans or Gemini Enterprise who want a terminal agent with a sandbox on by default and access to several model families, depending on plan.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 43 against 35
- Maintenance & community, 68 against 60
Watch for
Closed source. The repository holds the README, changelog and examples, with no source and no licence file
Harness C
Best for A developer who runs Claude Code and Codex on several machines and wants their agents to hand work to each other where the person can watch.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 85 against 78
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 30
- Transparency & trust, 68 against 51
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
Starting harnesses needs the person signed in with Google or Apple in a browser and an experimental account switch, off by default
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Antigravity CLI | Harness | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 43 | 35 | Antigravity CLI +8 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 78 | 85 | Harness +7 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 78 | 82 | Harness +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 53 | 57 | Harness +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 40 | Harness +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 68 | 60 | Antigravity CLI +8 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 51 | 68 | Harness +17 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 57.4/100 | C 60.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Antigravity CLI | Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Autonomous, Inc. | |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | stdio | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary. The repository holds the README, changelog and examples, with no source and no licence file. Use is under the Google Antigravity Additional Terms of Service, the Google Terms of Service and the Privacy Policy | MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | 7 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-17 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | none | 1.3k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Antigravity CLI
Google's terminal agent, shipped as a closed-source binary with a terminal sandbox on by default on macOS and Linux and documented headless JSON output. Interactions are used to improve Google products unless users opt out, and a headless run exits 0 when a tool is denied.
Harness
An agent can start Claude Code or Codex sessions the person can watch, on this or another of their machines, through documented CLI commands and seven annotated MCP tools with exit codes. Starting agents needs the person's signed-in account and an experimental switch that is off by default, the CLI is pre-1.0, and usage counts are shared by default.
Before you call either
Antigravity CLI
- Read the
statusfield from--output-format jsonand read stderr too. A tool refused for lack of approval still exits 0 - Pre-approve each shell command and tool a headless run needs with
action(target)rules underpermissions.allowin ~/.gemini/antigravity-cli/settings.json, because headless runs cannot ask - Export
GEMINI_API_KEYafter setting modelProvider to gemini. The CLI won't start when the key is missing, and setting the variable alone has no effect - Turn off Enable Telemetry in the Account settings before running on private repositories if Interactions should not be used for product improvement
- Set
--print-timeoutexplicitly. The docs give a five-minute default, whileagy --helpshows 0s
Harness
- Run
harness whoamifirst. If it says you may not start harnesses, tell the person and do the work yourself - Ask the person before installing Harness, and leave
harness loginand the agents-start-agents switch to them - Treat exit 5 as final and do not retry. Treat exit 3 as needs the person, and never answer a harness's question or permission prompt
- Name every harness, put the whole task in
harness new, then wait, read withharness showand close only the ones you started - Run each
harnesscommand on its own or joined with&&, since piped commands no longer match the permission rule
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Antigravity CLI or Harness?
Harness scores 60.3 (C) on agent readiness against Antigravity CLI's 57.4 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Antigravity CLI leads on reliability and maintenance & community.
Are Antigravity CLI and Harness open source?
No open-source release is listed for Antigravity CLI. Harness is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with Antigravity CLI or Harness
- Agent Zero vs Antigravity CLI
- Aider vs Antigravity CLI
- Amp vs Antigravity CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Claude Code
- Antigravity CLI vs Cline
- Antigravity CLI vs Cursor CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Devin
- Antigravity CLI vs Droid CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Pi
- Antigravity CLI vs Gemini CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs goose
- Antigravity CLI vs HarnessRouter
- Antigravity CLI vs Kilo Code CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Kiro CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Muse Code
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenCode
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenHands
- Antigravity CLI vs Prime Agent
- Antigravity CLI vs Qwen Code
- Antigravity CLI vs Mirror CLI
- Amp vs Harness
- Antigravity CLI vs CLI Manager
- Antigravity CLI vs Paperclip
- Antigravity CLI vs Parallax
- Claude Code vs Harness
- CLI Manager vs Harness
- Cline vs Harness
- Devin vs Harness
- Droid CLI vs Harness
- Gemini CLI vs Harness
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Harness
- goose vs Harness
- Harness vs HarnessRouter
- Harness vs Kilo Code CLI
- Harness vs Kiro CLI
- Harness vs Muse Code
- Harness vs OpenCode
- Harness vs OpenHands
- Harness vs Paperclip
- Harness vs Parallax
- Harness vs Prime Agent
- Harness vs Qwen Code
- Harness vs Mirror CLI
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-harness-autonomous.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/antigravity-cli.json·/api/v1/tools/harness-autonomous.json - From a terminal
anchor compare antigravity-cli harness-autonomous(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "antigravity-cli", "b": "harness-autonomous"}at/mcp, no key