Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Antigravity CLI vs Conductor
Antigravity CLI scores 54.7 (C) on agent readiness against Conductor's 41.3 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 1500 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Developers on Google AI plans or Gemini Enterprise who want a terminal agent with a sandbox on by default and access to several model families, depending on plan.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 43 against 25
- Schema & documentation, 78 against 60
- Agent ergonomics, 78 against 55
- Security & auth, 53 against 45
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 0
- Maintenance & community, 68 against 58
Watch for
Closed source. The repository holds the README, changelog and examples, with no source and no licence file
Best for Existing Conductor users planning their move before Cloud closes on 20 November 2026 and the local app winds down in early 2027.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Antigravity CLI loses 3 points for them
Watch for
No new downloads or sign-ups since 4 November 2026
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Payments & pricing Antigravity CLI +30
Antigravity CLI 30
Harness reading of the published rubric. No payment protocol in the docs, the pricing page or the plans page (0). Plan prices are public without a login, with a $0 individual plan and Gemini Enterprise Standard or Plus from $30 a seat a month, and Google AI Pro at $20 and Ultra at $100 or $200 a month per Google's 19 May 2026 post. Overages draw on AI credits at Gemini Enterprise consumption rates, which were not read, so this is plan-level pricing (10). The pricing page lists the $0 plan as needing no subscription, and none of the pages read asks for a payment method, but the account flow was not tested (20). Sign-in is a browser flow with a Google account, or a Gemini API key set by hand, and the CLI won't start unauthenticated (0). 0+10+20+0 = 30.
Conductor 0
No new sign-ups since 4 November, free users can't upgrade, and no price is shown. No protocol, no published price, no open free tier, no onboarding (0).
Agent ergonomics Antigravity CLI +23
Antigravity CLI 78
Framework reading, adapted to a harness driven by a pipeline. MCP tools can be allowed or refused by server and tool, and a 20,000-token budget for user rules stops large rule sets from crowding out skills and MCP tools (16). No turn or spend cap appears in the flag reference, and --print-timeout sets a wall-clock limit only, with no limit by default (10). The JSON envelope carries a status field and token usage, and since 1.4.11 a finished_reason field says why a turn ended early (16). Exit codes are documented, but a tool soft-denied in headless mode still exits 0 (14). --continue and --conversation resume earlier runs (14). A Python SDK on PyPI, which is a separate package, and no second SDK language for the CLI (8). 16+10+16+14+14+8 = 78.
Conductor 55
Harness reading. Each task gets a workspace, branch, terminal and diff, with pull requests and merges from the app, and an API for integrations; not re-read in detail (55).
Reliability Antigravity CLI +18
Antigravity CLI 43
Local-package reading. An official installer for macOS, Linux and Windows, with an Android build for Termux, that checks a SHA-512 checksum from Google's release manifest before it installs (install.sh re-read on 4 November) (20). No public CI or test suite, since the repository holds no source and no workflows, only issue templates (0). Open issues and pull requests could not be read, so the crash and regression line is unchecked (0). Behaviour changes ship in patch releases as Changed or Improved bullets with no breaking-change heading, such as 1.4.6 (23 October) closing ~/.docker and ~/.kube to sandboxed commands, and 1.2.10's exit-code change (8). Version 1.x, so stable under the rule (15). 20+0+0+8+15 = 43.
Conductor 25
Read as local software that is winding down. Installed from Conductor's own download, which stopped taking new users on 4 November 2026 (10). Closed source, so no public CI or issue tracker (0, 0). A dated changelog, newest 0.93.0 on 4 November (15). Version 0.93 (0). 10 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 25.
Schema & documentation Antigravity CLI +18
Antigravity CLI 78
Framework reading. No published JSON Schema for settings.json, mcp_config.json or hooks.json was found, although the docs type each key (10). llms.txt at antigravity.google/llms.txt, and every docs page has a Markdown copy (10). Pages say when to use each permission preset and execution mode, what each allows and when the sandbox applies (15). Presets, modes, output formats, status values and effort levels are enumerated (13). The headless page documents the output envelope, the status values and exit codes, with a jq example (15). A dated changelog on the docs site and versioned release notes and tags in the repository (15). 10+10+15+13+15+15 = 78.
Conductor 60
Harness reading. Docs for workspaces, review and merge, a Conductor API reference page linked from the docs (not read), and security and permissions pages (60).
Maintenance & community Antigravity CLI +10
Antigravity CLI 68
1.4.12 on 30 October 2026, marked Latest in the docs changelog, 5 days before this check (30). 56 tagged releases from 1.1.11 (6 August) to 1.4.12, each with a changelog entry; 1.5.0 is tagged and in the repository changelog on 4 November but not yet in the docs changelog, so it isn't counted (20). Responsiveness rests on a public changelog, a community forum linked from the terms and the GitHub repository, but no replies could be read (8). The google-antigravity Python SDK is a separate package and no SDK for the CLI itself was found; PyPI couldn't be read on 4 November, so the line rests on the 10 October reading (10). No public CI or dependency list for the CLI, since the source is not published (0). 30+20+8+10+0 = 68.
Conductor 58
0.93.0 on 4 November 2026 (30). Several dated releases in 90 days, per the changelog index (20). Discord, a subreddit and email for support (8). Closed app, no package or CI to read (0). 30 + 20 + 8 + 0 + 0 = 58. The local app gets new models and critical fixes only until early 2027.
Security & auth Antigravity CLI +8
Antigravity CLI 53
Framework reading (credentials and telemetry defaults, approvals and sandboxing, guardrails, audit, security programme), five lines. Credentials are a Google account sign-in kept in the operating system keyring, or a Gemini API key in settings.json. The README says using the CLI allows Google to collect Interactions until the user opts out (10). Since 1.3.5 on macOS and Linux and 1.4.4 on Windows 11 24H2 the default for personal accounts is Auto mode, which runs commands in the terminal sandbox, hides ~/.ssh, .env and, since 1.4.6, ~/.docker and ~/.kube, blocks network access outside approved domains, and has a separate agent review commands that leave the sandbox. Auto approves file edits and safe commands without asking, Turbo turns the sandbox off, and business accounts start in Default (18). Hooks run before and after tool calls and can block one, and since 1.4.11 a PreInvocation hook can stop a turn. No documented defence against prompt injection in fetched content was found (7). The CLI log records model resolution, and approvals show in the conversation, but no exportable audit log was found (10). google.com has a valid security.txt with reports to g.co/vulnz (per the 10 October check), antigravity.google serves none, no CLI advisory appears in the changelog, and NVD returns no CVE for Antigravity on 4 November. The repository's advisory page couldn't be read (8). 10+18+7+10+8 = 53.
Conductor 45
Closed app. Telemetry and data handling weren't read beyond the transition notice (10 of 30). A security and permissions page (10 of 20). No prompt-injection guidance found (5). No audit log found (5). SOC 2 Type II report at trust.conductor.build (15 of 20). 10 + 10 + 5 + 5 + 15 = 45.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Antigravity CLI | Conductor | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 43 | 25 | Antigravity CLI +18 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 78 | 60 | Antigravity CLI +18 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 78 | 55 | Antigravity CLI +23 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 53 | 45 | Antigravity CLI +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 0 | Antigravity CLI +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 68 | 58 | Antigravity CLI +10 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 55 | 53 | Antigravity CLI +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | C 54.7/100 | E 41.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Antigravity CLI | Conductor |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Conductor (joining Meta) | |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary. The repository holds the README, changelog and examples, with no source and no licence file. Use is under the Google Antigravity Additional Terms of Service, the Google Terms of Service and the Privacy Policy | Proprietary. A closed-source Mac app and hosted Conductor Cloud under Conductor's terms |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-11-04 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | not read yet |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | not read yet |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | not read yet |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not read yet |
How the scores have moved
Conductor
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Antigravity CLI
Google's terminal agent, a closed-source binary whose default Auto mode runs commands in a terminal sandbox on macOS, Linux and Windows 11, with documented headless JSON output. Interactions are collected for Google product improvement unless users opt out, a headless run exits 0 when a tool is denied, and 1.4.7 fixed a cross-user token flaw without an advisory.
Conductor
Conductor ran parallel coding agents on the Mac, and Meta is acquiring it. It has taken no new users since 4 November 2026, Cloud turns read-only on 13 November and shuts down on 20 November, and the local app winds down in early 2027, when all user data is deleted.
Before you call either
Antigravity CLI
- Read the
statusandfinished_reasonfields from--output-format jsonand read stderr too. A tool refused for lack of approval still exits 0 - Pre-approve each shell command and tool a headless run needs with
action(target)rules underpermissions.allowin ~/.gemini/antigravity-cli/settings.json, because headless runs cannot ask - Export
GEMINI_API_KEYafter setting modelProvider to gemini. The CLI won't start when the key is missing, and setting the variable alone has no effect - Turn off Enable Telemetry in /config before running on private repositories if Interactions should not be used for product improvement
- Grant sandbox access to ~/.docker or ~/.kube explicitly since 1.4.6 if a task needs Docker or Kubernetes credentials
Conductor
- Export your data from Settings, Account, Export data before 20 November 2026
- Move Cloud workspaces to your Mac with Transfer to local before 13 November
- Plan a move off the local app before early 2027; see the agent-harnesses category for alternatives
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Antigravity CLI or Conductor?
Antigravity CLI scores 54.7 (C) on agent readiness against Conductor's 41.3 (E), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Antigravity CLI or Conductor
- Agent Zero vs Antigravity CLI
- Agent Zero vs Conductor
- Aider vs Antigravity CLI
- Aider vs Conductor
- Amp vs Antigravity CLI
- Amp vs Conductor
- Antigravity CLI vs Auggie CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs AXLR
- Antigravity CLI vs Claude Code
- Antigravity CLI vs Cline
- Antigravity CLI vs Crush
- Antigravity CLI vs Cursor CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Antigravity CLI vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Antigravity CLI vs Devin
- Antigravity CLI vs Droid CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Pi
- Antigravity CLI vs Emdash
- Antigravity CLI vs Gemini CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs goose
- Antigravity CLI vs Harness²
- Antigravity CLI vs HarnessRouter
- Antigravity CLI vs Jules
- Antigravity CLI vs Junie CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Kilo Code CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Kiro CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Letta
- Antigravity CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Antigravity CLI vs MiniMax Code
- Antigravity CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Muse Code
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenAI Agents API
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenCode
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenHands
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Antigravity CLI vs Orca
- Antigravity CLI vs Paseo
- Antigravity CLI vs Prime Agent
- Antigravity CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Qwen Code
- Antigravity CLI vs Mirror CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Sculptor
- Antigravity CLI vs T3 Code
- Antigravity CLI vs Traycer
- Antigravity CLI vs Unstoppable
- Antigravity CLI vs Verdent
- Antigravity CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Antigravity CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Auggie CLI vs Conductor
- AXLR vs Conductor
- Claude Code vs Conductor
- Cline vs Conductor
- Conductor vs Crush
- Conductor vs Cursor CLI
- Conductor vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Conductor vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Conductor vs Devin
- Conductor vs Droid CLI
- Conductor vs Pi
- Conductor vs Emdash
- Conductor vs Gemini CLI
- Conductor vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Conductor vs goose
- Conductor vs Harness²
- Conductor vs HarnessRouter
- Conductor vs Jules
- Conductor vs Junie CLI
- Conductor vs Kilo Code CLI
- Conductor vs Kimi Code CLI
- Conductor vs Kiro CLI
- Conductor vs Letta
- Conductor vs mini-swe-agent
- Conductor vs MiniMax Code
- Conductor vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Conductor vs Muse Code
- Conductor vs OpenAI Agents API
- Conductor vs OpenAI Codex
- Conductor vs OpenCode
- Conductor vs OpenHands
- Conductor vs OpenMausBot
- Conductor vs Orca
- Conductor vs Paseo
- Conductor vs Prime Agent
- Conductor vs Qoder CLI
- Conductor vs Qwen Code
- Conductor vs Mirror CLI
- Conductor vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Conductor vs Sculptor
- Conductor vs T3 Code
- Conductor vs Traycer
- Conductor vs Unstoppable
- Conductor vs Verdent
- Conductor vs Vibe-Trading
- Conductor vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Antigravity CLI vs Clawboo
- Antigravity CLI vs CLI Manager
- Antigravity CLI vs Harness
- Antigravity CLI vs Paperclip
- Antigravity CLI vs Parallax
- Clawboo vs Conductor
- CLI Manager vs Conductor
- Conductor vs Harness
- Conductor vs Paperclip
- Conductor vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-conductor.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/antigravity-cli.json·/api/v1/tools/conductor.json - From a terminal
anchor compare antigravity-cli conductor(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "antigravity-cli", "b": "conductor"}at/mcp, no key