Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Conductor vs Emdash
Emdash scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Conductor's 41.3 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Conductor leads on schema & documentation and security & auth. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 1500 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Existing Conductor users planning their move before Cloud closes on 20 November 2026 and the local app winds down in early 2027.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 60 against 55
- Security & auth, 45 against 38
Watch for
No new downloads or sign-ups since 4 November 2026
Emdash D
Best for Developers who want parallel agents in worktrees, fed from their issue tracker, locally or over SSH.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 55 against 25
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 0
- Maintenance & community, 70 against 58
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
Watch for
Telemetry on unless turned off in Settings or with TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Payments & pricing Emdash +60
Conductor 0
No new sign-ups since 4 November, free users can't upgrade, and no price is shown. No protocol, no published price, no open free tier, no onboarding (0).
Emdash 60
Free self-hosted software with nothing to buy, so 0 for a protocol and 20 each for public pricing, a free tier and onboarding with no sign-up, 60.
Reliability Emdash +30
Conductor 25
Read as local software that is winding down. Installed from Conductor's own download, which stopped taking new users on 4 November 2026 (10). Closed source, so no public CI or issue tracker (0, 0). A dated changelog, newest 0.93.0 on 4 November (15). Version 0.93 (0). 10 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 25.
Emdash 55
Local software. Homebrew cask and installers for macOS, Windows and Linux (20). A code-consistency check and release workflows; no test workflow found (10). GitHub issues and pull requests weren't read (GitHub's pages refuse these sessions), so that line is scored absent (0). Stable tags to v1.2.11, release notes on GitHub (10). Version 1.2.11 (15). 20 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 15 = 55.
Maintenance & community Emdash +12
Conductor 58
0.93.0 on 4 November 2026 (30). Several dated releases in 90 days, per the changelog index (20). Discord, a subreddit and email for support (8). Closed app, no package or CI to read (0). 30 + 20 + 8 + 0 + 0 = 58. The local app gets new models and critical fixes only until early 2027.
Emdash 70
v1.2.11 on 6 November 2026 (30). v1.2.9, v1.2.10 and v1.2.11 within two weeks (20). GitHub issues and pull requests weren't read (GitHub's pages refuse these sessions), so that line is scored absent (0). Current installers and Homebrew cask (15). Release workflows, no test CI (5). 30 + 20 + 0 + 15 + 5 = 70.
Security & auth Conductor +7
Conductor 45
Closed app. Telemetry and data handling weren't read beyond the transition notice (10 of 30). A security and permissions page (10 of 20). No prompt-injection guidance found (5). No audit log found (5). SOC 2 Type II report at trust.conductor.build (15 of 20). 10 + 10 + 5 + 5 + 15 = 45.
Emdash 38
Harness reading. Telemetry is described as optional and disabled in Settings or with TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false, which reads as on by default (15 of 30). Worktree per task and remote machines over SSH (10 of 20). No prompt-injection guidance (5). No audit log (5). No security policy file found (3). 15 + 10 + 5 + 5 + 3 = 38.
Schema & documentation Conductor +5
Conductor 60
Harness reading. Docs for workspaces, review and merge, a Conductor API reference page linked from the docs (not read), and security and permissions pages (60).
Emdash 55
Harness reading. Docs site and a workspace server package (55).
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Conductor | Emdash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 25 | 55 | Emdash +30 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 60 | 55 | Conductor +5 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 55 | 55 | even |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 45 | 38 | Conductor +7 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 0 | 60 | Emdash +60 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 58 | 70 | Emdash +12 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 53 | 54 | Emdash +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | E 41.3/100 | D 53.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Conductor | Emdash |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Conductor (joining Meta) | General Action, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary. A closed-source Mac app and hosted Conductor Cloud under Conductor's terms | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-06 |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | not read yet | no document linked |
Verdicts
Conductor
Conductor ran parallel coding agents on the Mac, and Meta is acquiring it. It has taken no new users since 4 November 2026, Cloud turns read-only on 13 November and shuts down on 20 November, and the local app winds down in early 2027, when all user data is deleted.
Emdash
A mature open-source app for parallel coding agents in Git worktrees, with issue intake from a dozen trackers and remote machines over SSH. Telemetry is on unless you turn it off, and no test workflow was found in the repository.
Before you call either
Conductor
- Export your data from Settings, Account, Export data before 20 November 2026
- Move Cloud workspaces to your Mac with Transfer to local before 13 November
- Plan a move off the local app before early 2027; see the agent-harnesses category for alternatives
Emdash
- Launch with TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false if you don't want telemetry
- Use the SSH mode to keep agents on a remote machine
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Conductor or Emdash?
Emdash scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Conductor's 41.3 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Conductor leads on schema & documentation and security & auth.
Are Conductor and Emdash open source?
No open-source release is listed for Conductor. Emdash is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Conductor or Emdash
- Agent Zero vs Conductor
- Agent Zero vs Emdash
- Aider vs Conductor
- Aider vs Emdash
- Amp vs Conductor
- Amp vs Emdash
- Antigravity CLI vs Conductor
- Antigravity CLI vs Emdash
- Auggie CLI vs Conductor
- Auggie CLI vs Emdash
- AXLR vs Conductor
- AXLR vs Emdash
- Claude Code vs Conductor
- Claude Code vs Emdash
- Cline vs Conductor
- Cline vs Emdash
- Conductor vs Crush
- Conductor vs Cursor CLI
- Conductor vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Conductor vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Conductor vs Devin
- Conductor vs Droid CLI
- Conductor vs Pi
- Conductor vs Gemini CLI
- Conductor vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Conductor vs goose
- Conductor vs Harness²
- Conductor vs HarnessRouter
- Conductor vs Jules
- Conductor vs Junie CLI
- Conductor vs Kilo Code CLI
- Conductor vs Kimi Code CLI
- Conductor vs Kiro CLI
- Conductor vs Letta
- Conductor vs mini-swe-agent
- Conductor vs MiniMax Code
- Conductor vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Conductor vs Muse Code
- Conductor vs OpenAI Agents API
- Conductor vs OpenAI Codex
- Conductor vs OpenCode
- Conductor vs OpenHands
- Conductor vs OpenMausBot
- Conductor vs Orca
- Conductor vs Paseo
- Conductor vs Prime Agent
- Conductor vs Qoder CLI
- Conductor vs Qwen Code
- Conductor vs Mirror CLI
- Conductor vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Conductor vs Sculptor
- Conductor vs T3 Code
- Conductor vs Traycer
- Conductor vs Unstoppable
- Conductor vs Verdent
- Conductor vs Vibe-Trading
- Conductor vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Crush vs Emdash
- Cursor CLI vs Emdash
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Emdash
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Emdash
- Devin vs Emdash
- Droid CLI vs Emdash
- Pi vs Emdash
- Emdash vs Gemini CLI
- Emdash vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Emdash vs goose
- Emdash vs Harness²
- Emdash vs HarnessRouter
- Emdash vs Jules
- Emdash vs Junie CLI
- Emdash vs Kilo Code CLI
- Emdash vs Kimi Code CLI
- Emdash vs Kiro CLI
- Emdash vs Letta
- Emdash vs mini-swe-agent
- Emdash vs MiniMax Code
- Emdash vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Emdash vs Muse Code
- Emdash vs OpenAI Agents API
- Emdash vs OpenAI Codex
- Emdash vs OpenCode
- Emdash vs OpenHands
- Emdash vs OpenMausBot
- Emdash vs Orca
- Emdash vs Paseo
- Emdash vs Prime Agent
- Emdash vs Qoder CLI
- Emdash vs Qwen Code
- Emdash vs Mirror CLI
- Emdash vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Emdash vs Sculptor
- Emdash vs T3 Code
- Emdash vs Traycer
- Emdash vs Unstoppable
- Emdash vs Verdent
- Emdash vs Vibe-Trading
- Emdash vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Clawboo vs Conductor
- Clawboo vs Emdash
- CLI Manager vs Conductor
- CLI Manager vs Emdash
- Conductor vs Harness
- Conductor vs Paperclip
- Conductor vs Parallax
- Emdash vs Harness
- Emdash vs Paperclip
- Emdash vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/conductor-vs-emdash.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/conductor.json·/api/v1/tools/emdash.json - From a terminal
anchor compare conductor emdash(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "conductor", "b": "emdash"}at/mcp, no key