Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Droid CLI vs Emdash
Droid CLI scores 57.2 (C) on agent readiness against Emdash's 53.9 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Emdash leads on payments & pricing. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 1500 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams that want a terminal coding agent with tiered autonomy, command rules and an optional sandbox, and that will pay for a Factory plan.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 79 against 55
- Agent ergonomics, 72 against 55
- Security & auth, 63 against 38
- Maintenance & community, 79 against 70
- Transparency & trust, 65 against 54
Watch for
No free tier or trial was found. Plans start at $20 a month and included usage is stated only as rolling rate limits without numbers
Emdash D
Best for Developers who want parallel agents in worktrees, fed from their issue tracker, locally or over SSH.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 10
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
- No incidents deducted, where Droid CLI loses 3 points for them
Watch for
Telemetry on unless turned off in Settings or with TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Payments & pricing Emdash +50
Droid CLI 10
Harness reading of the published rubric. This is paid, closed software tied to a subscription, so the self-hosted rule does not apply. No payment protocol (0). Plan prices are public, $20, $100 and $200 a month for individuals and $60 a team plus $40 a seat for Teams, but included usage is given only as rolling rate limits and multiples of Pro (10). No free tier or trial was found on the pricing pages. Using your own model key is free up to an allowance, but only on a paid plan (0). A person signs in through a browser to subscribe and to create the API key. The Service Accounts API can issue keys only inside an existing organisation (0).
Emdash 60
Free self-hosted software with nothing to buy, so 0 for a protocol and 20 each for public pricing, a free tier and onboarding with no sign-up, 60.
Security & auth Droid CLI +25
Droid CLI 63
Harness reading of the framework checklist, as for the other harnesses. 30 for what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. The agent loop runs locally and the docs say no copy of the repository is uploaded or indexed. Prompts and context go to the model endpoints. Usage metrics go to Factory's collector by default, with no opt-out in the pages read outside an airgapped deployment, and message content is never sent to it. The security page says code is not used as training data. Zero data retention is listed as a Business plan item. Headless runs use a long-lived fk- key (17). droid exec is read-only by default, autonomy has four levels, permission rules allow, ask or block commands, and an OS sandbox confines commands with Seatbelt or bubblewrap and a network proxy. The sandbox is off by default and --skip-permissions-unsafe skips every prompt (16). The sandbox page names prompt injection and states what the sandbox does not stop, MCP approvals are bound to the server's command or URL, and Droid Shield scans commits for secrets. The Agent Safety page was not read (9). An organisation audit log, OpenTelemetry export and session tags exist, with audit logging listed from the Business plan up (10). A disclosure address (security@factory.com), SOC 2 and ISO 42001 named on the security page, per the 9 October check, and Security sections in the changelog. No security.txt (404 on 4 November), no bug bounty and no published advisories were found, OSV holds nothing for droid, and the trust centre was not readable (11).
Emdash 38
Harness reading. Telemetry is described as optional and disabled in Settings or with TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false, which reads as on by default (15 of 30). Worktree per task and remote machines over SSH (10 of 20). No prompt-injection guidance (5). No audit log (5). No security policy file found (3). 15 + 10 + 5 + 5 + 3 = 38.
Schema & documentation Droid CLI +24
Droid CLI 79
Framework reading. The docs index links an OpenAPI file for the Factory public API, which we did not open, and the headless mode has a documented JSON-RPC surface with named methods. droid exec --list-tools --output-format json and droid rules check --json give machine-readable output. We found no published schema for the settings file (15). docs.factory.com/llms.txt lists a Markdown copy of every page (10). The overview says when to use the CLI, and the autonomy table says what each level allows, blocks and suits (16). Autonomy levels, output formats, sandbox modes and MCP server fields are enumerated with types and defaults (12). Examples on every page read, exit codes 0, 1 and 2, and a JSON result with is_error and subtype, with no error catalogue (11). A changelog by CLI version with dates and an RSS feed, 236 entries back to 30 September 2025 (15).
Emdash 55
Harness reading. Docs site and a workspace server package (55).
Agent ergonomics Droid CLI +17
Droid CLI 72
Harness reading of the framework line. --restrict-tools, --disabled-tools, --additional-tools and --list-tools control built-in tools per run, and disabledTools in mcp.json keeps named MCP tools out of context. We found nothing on deferred tool loading (18). Output is text, json, stream-json or stream-jsonrpc, and the JSON result carries turns and duration. The droid exec help lists no flag for a turn or spend limit (10). Exit codes 0, 1 and 2 are documented, and a run that exceeds its autonomy level stops with a non-zero code and no partial changes, per the docs (15). --session-id continues a session, --fork branches one, and --worktree isolates parallel runs (16). Headless runs are read-only without flags, and TypeScript and Python SDKs wrap the CLI. A run needs a paid Factory account and an API key (13).
Emdash 55
Harness reading. Issue intake from Linear, GitHub, Jira and others, diff review, pull requests and CI checks in one place, local or over SSH (55).
Transparency & trust Droid CLI +11
Droid CLI 65
Closed source under terms from The San Francisco AI Factory, Inc., last updated 14 July 2026. The npm package is marked UNLICENSED and the Python SDK is Apache-2.0 (15). The Data Flows page says where code, prompts and telemetry go in each deployment pattern, and the privacy policy (20 August 2026) lists service providers with the place of processing and keeps personal data up to 10 years after last use. Retention of Factory's operational logs is left to the trust centre, which we could not read, and whether session transcripts are stored in Factory's cloud on individual plans was not established (17). The terms promise commercially reasonable efforts to give 60 days' notice of major changes, the changelog has Deprecations sections, and the old command lists are deprecated but still honoured. A model retirement appeared in the changelog on the day it took effect, 11 August 2026 (12). The telemetry reference documents each metric and what reaches Factory, and telemetry.granularity can strip user identity. Metrics to Factory are on by default, with no opt-out found outside an airgapped deployment (11).
Emdash 54
Apache 2.0 (30). A telemetry page on the docs site (not read) (18 of 30). No deprecation policy (5). Disclosed with an opt-out (15 of 20). 30 + 18 + 5 + 15 = 68.
Maintenance & community Droid CLI +9
Droid CLI 79
The changelog's newest entry is CLI v1.3.0 of 4 November 2026 (30). 67 dated changelog entries between 6 August and 4 November 2026, 20 of them after 9 October (20). The public tracker had 33 open issues that are not pull requests on 9 October 2026, most with no reply, and three closed in the previous week after two or three comments, not re-read on 4 November. Support is also by email and Discord, where reply times are not visible (9). The TypeScript SDK repository moved to 0.10.0 with examples tested in CI on 20 October 2026, and the Python SDK is at 0.5.0 of 24 September 2026 (15). The npm package is published from GitHub Actions through a trusted publisher and the installer checks a checksum, per the 9 October check. There is no public CI for the CLI (5).
Emdash 70
v1.2.11 on 6 November 2026 (30). v1.2.9, v1.2.10 and v1.2.11 within two weeks (20). GitHub issues and pull requests weren't read (GitHub's pages refuse these sessions), so that line is scored absent (0). Current installers and Homebrew cask (15). Release workflows, no test CI (5). 30 + 20 + 0 + 15 + 5 = 70.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Droid CLI | Emdash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 54 | 55 | Emdash +1 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 79 | 55 | Droid CLI +24 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 72 | 55 | Droid CLI +17 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 63 | 38 | Droid CLI +25 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 10 | 60 | Emdash +50 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 79 | 70 | Droid CLI +9 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 65 | 54 | Droid CLI +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | C 57.2/100 | D 53.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Droid CLI | Emdash |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Factory | General Action, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary, under Factory's Terms and Conditions. The droid npm package is marked UNLICENSED and the public repository holds documentation only. The Python SDK is Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-06 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-14 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-08-20 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not read yet |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not read yet |
| Popularity | 49 stars, 7.8k npm/wk | none |
How the scores have moved
Emdash
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Droid CLI
droid exec is read-only unless --auto raises the autonomy level, with command rules, an optional kernel-enforced sandbox, JSON output and documented exit codes. No free tier, status page or security.txt was found, the source is closed, usage metrics go to Factory by default, and security fixes ship in release notes without advisories.
Emdash
A mature open-source app for parallel coding agents in Git worktrees, with issue intake from a dozen trackers and remote machines over SSH. Telemetry is on unless you turn it off, and no test workflow was found in the repository.
Before you call either
Droid CLI
- Set
FACTORY_API_KEY(startsfk-) from the API keys page in Factory settings for headless runs. Interactive use signs in through a browser - Start with
droid execand no flags for analysis. Add--auto lowfor edits and--auto mediumfor installs, tests and local commits - Use
--output-format jsonand readis_error,num_turnsandsession_id. Treat a non-zero exit code as failure - Set
sandbox.enabledto true before running on untrusted code. Indroid execa sandbox violation is denied without a prompt - Pin the version in CI with
npm install -g droid@<version>, or setFACTORY_DROID_AUTO_UPDATE_ENABLED=falseon standalone installs, which update themselves. Read each release's Security section before upgrading
Emdash
- Launch with TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false if you don't want telemetry
- Use the SSH mode to keep agents on a remote machine
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Droid CLI or Emdash?
Droid CLI scores 57.2 (C) on agent readiness against Emdash's 53.9 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Emdash leads on payments & pricing.
Are Droid CLI and Emdash open source?
No open-source release is listed for Droid CLI. Emdash is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Droid CLI or Emdash
- Agent Zero vs Droid CLI
- Agent Zero vs Emdash
- Aider vs Droid CLI
- Aider vs Emdash
- Amp vs Droid CLI
- Amp vs Emdash
- Antigravity CLI vs Droid CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Emdash
- Auggie CLI vs Droid CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Emdash
- AXLR vs Droid CLI
- AXLR vs Emdash
- Claude Code vs Droid CLI
- Claude Code vs Emdash
- Cline vs Droid CLI
- Cline vs Emdash
- Conductor vs Droid CLI
- Conductor vs Emdash
- Crush vs Droid CLI
- Crush vs Emdash
- Cursor CLI vs Droid CLI
- Cursor CLI vs Emdash
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Droid CLI
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Emdash
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Droid CLI
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Emdash
- Devin vs Droid CLI
- Devin vs Emdash
- Droid CLI vs Pi
- Droid CLI vs Gemini CLI
- Droid CLI vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Droid CLI vs goose
- Droid CLI vs Harness²
- Droid CLI vs HarnessRouter
- Droid CLI vs Jules
- Droid CLI vs Junie CLI
- Droid CLI vs Kilo Code CLI
- Droid CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Droid CLI vs Kiro CLI
- Droid CLI vs Letta
- Droid CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Droid CLI vs MiniMax Code
- Droid CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Droid CLI vs Muse Code
- Droid CLI vs OpenAI Agents API
- Droid CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- Droid CLI vs OpenCode
- Droid CLI vs OpenHands
- Droid CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Droid CLI vs Orca
- Droid CLI vs Paseo
- Droid CLI vs Prime Agent
- Droid CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Droid CLI vs Qwen Code
- Droid CLI vs Mirror CLI
- Droid CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Droid CLI vs Sculptor
- Droid CLI vs T3 Code
- Droid CLI vs Traycer
- Droid CLI vs Unstoppable
- Droid CLI vs Verdent
- Droid CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Droid CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Pi vs Emdash
- Emdash vs Gemini CLI
- Emdash vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Emdash vs goose
- Emdash vs Harness²
- Emdash vs HarnessRouter
- Emdash vs Jules
- Emdash vs Junie CLI
- Emdash vs Kilo Code CLI
- Emdash vs Kimi Code CLI
- Emdash vs Kiro CLI
- Emdash vs Letta
- Emdash vs mini-swe-agent
- Emdash vs MiniMax Code
- Emdash vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Emdash vs Muse Code
- Emdash vs OpenAI Agents API
- Emdash vs OpenAI Codex
- Emdash vs OpenCode
- Emdash vs OpenHands
- Emdash vs OpenMausBot
- Emdash vs Orca
- Emdash vs Paseo
- Emdash vs Prime Agent
- Emdash vs Qoder CLI
- Emdash vs Qwen Code
- Emdash vs Mirror CLI
- Emdash vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Emdash vs Sculptor
- Emdash vs T3 Code
- Emdash vs Traycer
- Emdash vs Unstoppable
- Emdash vs Verdent
- Emdash vs Vibe-Trading
- Emdash vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Clawboo vs Droid CLI
- Clawboo vs Emdash
- CLI Manager vs Droid CLI
- CLI Manager vs Emdash
- Droid CLI vs Harness
- Droid CLI vs Paperclip
- Droid CLI vs Parallax
- Emdash vs Harness
- Emdash vs Paperclip
- Emdash vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/droid-cli-vs-emdash.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/droid-cli.json·/api/v1/tools/emdash.json - From a terminal
anchor compare droid-cli emdash(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "droid-cli", "b": "emdash"}at/mcp, no key