Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Emdash vs OpenMausBot
OpenMausBot scores 65.4 (B) on agent readiness against Emdash's 53.9 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Emdash leads on payments & pricing. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 1500 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Emdash D
Best for Developers who want parallel agents in worktrees, fed from their issue tracker, locally or over SSH.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 50
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
Telemetry on unless turned off in Settings or with TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false
Best for A person or an outside agent who wants several CLI agents (Claude Code, Codex, Grok, ACP CLIs) organised as named bots with their own computers, routines and approvals, driven by MCP or a CLI.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 60 against 55
- Schema & documentation, 90 against 55
- Agent ergonomics, 77 against 55
- Security & auth, 59 against 38
- Transparency & trust, 59 against 54
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
New bots start at Full access, which approves provider permission requests without a card
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Schema & documentation OpenMausBot +35
Emdash 55
Harness reading. Docs site and a workspace server package (55).
OpenMausBot 90
The MCP server's 20 tools each have a JSON Schema input with additionalProperties: false and required fields marked. No OpenAPI for the local HTTP API (25). Markdown docs in the repository, and the docs app's source serves llms.txt, llms-full.txt and Markdown routes. docs.openmausbot.com disallows every crawler, so the live llms.txt was not read (10). Descriptions state purpose and limits, such as that update_bot_profile cannot alter permissions, that send_bot_message may make the bot use external tools and that edit_bot_message is refused while a thread works, and the server instructions say to read before mutating. Few say when not to use a tool (15). Integer limits with minimum and maximum, an enum on scope, a pattern on send_id and oneOf shapes for responders (13). JSON configuration examples for each install path, the wait statuses and job states, CLI exit codes and a { ok, error, hint, exitCode } failure shape (12). MCP server version 1.1.0, release notes per version and a changelog page in the docs (15).
Agent ergonomics OpenMausBot +22
Emdash 55
Harness reading. Issue intake from Linear, GitHub, Jira and others, diff review, pull requests and CI checks in one place, local or over SSH (55).
OpenMausBot 77
20 tools, inside the 11 to 30 band, with annotations that separate reads from writes but no toolsets or read-only mode to load. Transcript reads are bounded and never return screenshot pixels (17). limit up to 200 messages, search capped at 100 hits, task_id and scope filters, and since_ms and after_version to keep watching a job (17). wait_for_conversation reports settled, needs-user, failed, stalled or timed-out with a redacted transcript tail, and the CLI's exit codes separate a pending approval from a timeout. We did not read every MCP error path (15). send_id makes a repeated send return the first receipt, wait is held by the server rather than polled, and every tool carries readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint and openWorldHint (20). Few required parameters and defaults for task, limit and timeout. The server answers only while the app or openmausbot serve runs, mutating tools need a paired token in packaged builds, and there is no client SDK beyond the CLI (8).
Security & auth OpenMausBot +21
Emdash 38
Harness reading. Telemetry is described as optional and disabled in Settings or with TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false, which reads as on by default (15 of 30). Worktree per task and remote machines over SSH (10 of 20). No prompt-injection guidance (5). No audit log (5). No security policy file found (3). 15 + 10 + 5 + 5 + 3 = 38.
OpenMausBot 59
Harness reading of the framework checklist, as for the other harnesses. 30 for what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. The harness binds to loopback and keys stay in ~/.openmausbot, but PostHog usage analytics are on until switched off, with a daily snapshot of what is set up, and the CLI guide says API keys are saved in plaintext with mode 0600 (18). Approval cards for provider permission requests, a narrow Always allow, isolated Local VMs and cloud computers, own-computer control off by default, and an MCP server that cannot approve, delete or touch credentials. New bots start at Full access, bot changes to skills, profiles and team setup apply without approval, and new bots keep every connected-app tool until grants are assigned (10). The docs say web page instructions never authorise credential use and that one-time codes go only to the site that sent them, and imported bots arrive with no grants, but bots read one-time codes from connected email without asking again (9). Per-thread NDJSON event logs, an Inspector, a decision log for connected-app grants and Undo lines for bot changes (12). SECURITY.md with an email, GitHub private vulnerability reporting enabled and scope notes that name one open risk. No published advisories, security.txt or bug bounty. npm releases use trusted publishing with provenance, and the Windows installer is unsigned (10).
Payments & pricing Emdash +10
Emdash 60
Free self-hosted software with nothing to buy, so 0 for a protocol and 20 each for public pricing, a free tier and onboarding with no sign-up, 60.
OpenMausBot 50
No payment protocol (0). MausBot Cloud, the hosted option, is priced by plan on a public page ($15, $49 and $99 a month, Team $169 and Business $599, or Business self-hosted $299 a month billed yearly, re-read on 2 November), with extra computer-hours at $0.05 each, so plan pricing (10). The app is free with no card or account (20). npx openmausbot installs and starts it with no signup (20).
Reliability OpenMausBot +5
Emdash 55
Local software. Homebrew cask and installers for macOS, Windows and Linux (20). A code-consistency check and release workflows; no test workflow found (10). GitHub issues and pull requests weren't read (GitHub's pages refuse these sessions), so that line is scored absent (0). Stable tags to v1.2.11, release notes on GitHub (10). Version 1.2.11 (15). 20 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 15 = 55.
OpenMausBot 60
Read as local software. Official npm package openmausbot (Node.js 24 or newer) and signed, notarised macOS builds, a Windows installer and Ubuntu 24.04 packages, with supported platforms and a capability table in the README (20). 2,075 test files and a CI workflow on main. Of the last 23 finished CI runs on main on 30 October 2026, 10 passed, 3 failed and 10 were cancelled by newer pushes in a serialised queue (20). 365 open issues against about 3,940 issues and pull requests filed since 11 August, so most are closed, but the 25 newest open issues include several bug reports from 29 and 30 October with no reply yet (15). Release notes for every version in New, Easier and Fixed sections, but new capabilities ship in 0.1.x patch versions and no release marks breaking changes (5). Version 0.1.134, and the README calls the project early (0).
Transparency & trust OpenMausBot +5
Emdash 54
Apache 2.0 (30). A telemetry page on the docs site (not read) (18 of 30). No deprecation policy (5). Disclosed with an opt-out (15 of 20). 30 + 18 + 5 + 15 = 68.
OpenMausBot 59
Apache 2.0 outside enterprise/, which is source-available and needs a licence key in production. Deleting the folder leaves the open-source edition, and a CI job builds it (27). The privacy policy of 18 October 2026 (re-read on 2 November, unchanged) names Supamaus Software Private Limited and separates the local apps from the optional hosted service, but it says the apps contain no third-party analytics SDKs while the app loads posthog-js by default, and hosted account data is kept while needed with no period stated (12). No deprecation policy. Dated release notes, and older installers kept in a legacy releases repository (4). docs/analytics.md lists every event and property and how to switch it off, but analytics are on by default and the privacy policy does not mention them for the apps (14).
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Emdash | OpenMausBot | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 55 | 60 | OpenMausBot +5 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 55 | 90 | OpenMausBot +35 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 55 | 77 | OpenMausBot +22 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 38 | 59 | OpenMausBot +21 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 50 | Emdash +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 70 | 74 | OpenMausBot +4 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 54 | 59 | OpenMausBot +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | D 53.9/100 | B 65.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Emdash | OpenMausBot |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | General Action, Inc. | Supamaus Software Private Limited |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | stdio | |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | 20 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-06 | 2026-11-01 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-10-10 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-10-18 |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 8.2k stars, 3.5k npm/wk |
Verdicts
Emdash
A mature open-source app for parallel coding agents in Git worktrees, with issue intake from a dozen trackers and remote machines over SSH. Telemetry is on unless you turn it off, and no test workflow was found in the repository.
OpenMausBot
A bounded 20-tool MCP server with typed schemas, annotations and idempotent sends, and a headless CLI with JSON output and exit codes, let another agent hand work to a bot team and wait on it. New bots start at Full access, so provider permission requests pass without a card, and usage analytics stay on until switched off.
Before you call either
Emdash
- Launch with TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false if you don't want telemetry
- Use the SSH mode to keep agents on a remote machine
OpenMausBot
- Ask the owner for a pairing code from Settings > Phone, exchange it at
POST /api/auth/pair, and setOPENMAUSBOT_TOKENwith an explicitOMB_PORT - Pass a
send_idwith everysend_bot_messageandsend_channel_message, so a retry returns the first receipt - Use
wait_for_conversationinstead of polling, and onneeds-userstop and tell the owner a card is waiting - Check a bot's access level with the owner before sending work. New bots run at Full access unless defaults were changed
- Ask the owner to switch off Settings > General > Usage analytics if nothing beyond model calls should leave the machine
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Emdash or OpenMausBot?
OpenMausBot scores 65.4 (B) on agent readiness against Emdash's 53.9 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Emdash leads on payments & pricing.
Are Emdash and OpenMausBot open source?
Yes. Emdash is open source (Apache-2.0). OpenMausBot is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Emdash or OpenMausBot
- Agent Zero vs Emdash
- Agent Zero vs OpenMausBot
- Aider vs Emdash
- Aider vs OpenMausBot
- Amp vs Emdash
- Amp vs OpenMausBot
- Antigravity CLI vs Emdash
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Auggie CLI vs Emdash
- Auggie CLI vs OpenMausBot
- AXLR vs Emdash
- AXLR vs OpenMausBot
- Claude Code vs Emdash
- Claude Code vs OpenMausBot
- Cline vs Emdash
- Cline vs OpenMausBot
- Conductor vs Emdash
- Conductor vs OpenMausBot
- Crush vs Emdash
- Crush vs OpenMausBot
- Cursor CLI vs Emdash
- Cursor CLI vs OpenMausBot
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Emdash
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs OpenMausBot
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Emdash
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs OpenMausBot
- Devin vs Emdash
- Devin vs OpenMausBot
- Droid CLI vs Emdash
- Droid CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Pi vs Emdash
- Pi vs OpenMausBot
- Emdash vs Gemini CLI
- Emdash vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Emdash vs goose
- Emdash vs Harness²
- Emdash vs HarnessRouter
- Emdash vs Jules
- Emdash vs Junie CLI
- Emdash vs Kilo Code CLI
- Emdash vs Kimi Code CLI
- Emdash vs Kiro CLI
- Emdash vs Letta
- Emdash vs mini-swe-agent
- Emdash vs MiniMax Code
- Emdash vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Emdash vs Muse Code
- Emdash vs OpenAI Agents API
- Emdash vs OpenAI Codex
- Emdash vs OpenCode
- Emdash vs OpenHands
- Emdash vs Orca
- Emdash vs Paseo
- Emdash vs Prime Agent
- Emdash vs Qoder CLI
- Emdash vs Qwen Code
- Emdash vs Mirror CLI
- Emdash vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Emdash vs Sculptor
- Emdash vs T3 Code
- Emdash vs Traycer
- Emdash vs Unstoppable
- Emdash vs Verdent
- Emdash vs Vibe-Trading
- Emdash vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Gemini CLI vs OpenMausBot
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenMausBot
- goose vs OpenMausBot
- Harness² vs OpenMausBot
- HarnessRouter vs OpenMausBot
- Jules vs OpenMausBot
- Junie CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kilo Code CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kiro CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Letta vs OpenMausBot
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenMausBot
- MiniMax Code vs OpenMausBot
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Muse Code vs OpenMausBot
- OpenAI Agents API vs OpenMausBot
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenMausBot
- OpenCode vs OpenMausBot
- OpenHands vs OpenMausBot
- Clawboo vs Emdash
- Clawboo vs OpenMausBot
- CLI Manager vs Emdash
- CLI Manager vs OpenMausBot
- Emdash vs Harness
- Emdash vs Paperclip
- Emdash vs Parallax
- Harness vs OpenMausBot
- OpenMausBot vs Orca
- OpenMausBot vs Paperclip
- OpenMausBot vs Parallax
- OpenMausBot vs Paseo
- OpenMausBot vs Prime Agent
- OpenMausBot vs Qoder CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Qwen Code
- OpenMausBot vs Mirror CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Sculptor
- OpenMausBot vs T3 Code
- OpenMausBot vs Traycer
- OpenMausBot vs Unstoppable
- OpenMausBot vs Verdent
- OpenMausBot vs Vibe-Trading
- OpenMausBot vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/emdash-vs-openmausbot.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/emdash.json·/api/v1/tools/openmausbot.json - From a terminal
anchor compare emdash openmausbot(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "emdash", "b": "openmausbot"}at/mcp, no key