Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Crush vs OpenMausBot
OpenMausBot scores 65.4 (B) on agent readiness against Crush's 56.7 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Crush leads on payments & pricing and maintenance & community. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 875 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Crush C
Best for Developers who want a Go terminal agent with a wide provider list, local models and Claude Code-compatible hooks.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 55 against 50
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 74
Watch for
crush run approves every permission request automatically, which the README doesn't mention
Best for A person or an outside agent who wants several CLI agents (Claude Code, Codex, Grok, ACP CLIs) organised as named bots with their own computers, routines and approvals, driven by MCP or a CLI.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 60 against 54
- Schema & documentation, 90 against 65
- Agent ergonomics, 77 against 52
- Security & auth, 59 against 44
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
Watch for
New bots start at Full access, which approves provider permission requests without a card
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Crush | OpenMausBot | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 54 | 60 | OpenMausBot +6 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 65 | 90 | OpenMausBot +25 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 52 | 77 | OpenMausBot +25 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 44 | 59 | OpenMausBot +15 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 55 | 50 | Crush +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 74 | Crush +8 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 59 | 59 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | C 56.7/100 | B 65.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Crush | OpenMausBot |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Charm | Supamaus Software Private Limited |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | stdio | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | FSL-1.1-MIT (source-available, each release converts to MIT two years after it is made available) | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | 20 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-09 | 2026-10-30 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-10-10 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-10-18 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 29k stars, 5.6k npm/wk | 8.2k stars, 3.5k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Crush
Works with almost any provider or a local model and needs no Charm account. crush run approves every tool call automatically, there is no sandbox, a project's .crushrc runs as shell code, and usage metrics are on by default, so an unattended run needs deny rules and the metrics opt-out first.
OpenMausBot
A bounded 20-tool MCP server with typed schemas, annotations and idempotent sends, and a headless CLI with JSON output and exit codes, let another agent hand work to a bot team and wait on it. New bots start at Full access, so provider permission requests pass without a card, and usage analytics stay on until switched off.
Before you call either
Crush
- Add
permissions denyrules or a PreToolUse hook beforecrush run. It approves every permission request in its session - Read
.crushrc,crushrcandcrush.jsonin a cloned repository before running Crush there. They execute as shell code at startup - Set
CRUSH_DISABLE_METRICS=1orDO_NOT_TRACK=1to stop usage metrics to data.charm.land - Wrap
crush runin your own timeout. It has no turn, time or cost limit flag - Configure a provider by environment variable or
crushrcfirst. With none,crush runexits with an error asking for interactive setup
OpenMausBot
- Ask the owner for a pairing code from Settings > Phone, exchange it at
POST /api/auth/pair, and setOPENMAUSBOT_TOKENwith an explicitOMB_PORT - Pass a
send_idwith everysend_bot_messageandsend_channel_message, so a retry returns the first receipt - Use
wait_for_conversationinstead of polling, and onneeds-userstop and tell the owner a card is waiting - Check a bot's access level with the owner before sending work. New bots run at Full access unless defaults were changed
- Ask the owner to switch off Settings > General > Usage analytics if nothing beyond model calls should leave the machine
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Crush or OpenMausBot?
OpenMausBot scores 65.4 (B) on agent readiness against Crush's 56.7 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Crush leads on payments & pricing and maintenance & community.
Are Crush and OpenMausBot open source?
No open-source release is listed for Crush. OpenMausBot is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Crush or OpenMausBot
- Agent Zero vs Crush
- Agent Zero vs OpenMausBot
- Aider vs Crush
- Aider vs OpenMausBot
- Amp vs Crush
- Amp vs OpenMausBot
- Antigravity CLI vs Crush
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Auggie CLI vs Crush
- Auggie CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Claude Code vs Crush
- Claude Code vs OpenMausBot
- Cline vs Crush
- Cline vs OpenMausBot
- Crush vs Cursor CLI
- Crush vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Crush vs Devin
- Crush vs Droid CLI
- Crush vs Pi
- Crush vs Gemini CLI
- Crush vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Crush vs goose
- Crush vs Harness²
- Crush vs HarnessRouter
- Crush vs Jules
- Crush vs Junie CLI
- Crush vs Kilo Code CLI
- Crush vs Kimi Code CLI
- Crush vs Kiro CLI
- Crush vs mini-swe-agent
- Crush vs MiniMax Code
- Crush vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Crush vs Muse Code
- Crush vs OpenAI Codex
- Crush vs OpenCode
- Crush vs OpenHands
- Crush vs Prime Agent
- Crush vs Qoder CLI
- Crush vs Qwen Code
- Crush vs Mirror CLI
- Crush vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Crush vs Unstoppable
- Crush vs Vibe-Trading
- Crush vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Cursor CLI vs OpenMausBot
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs OpenMausBot
- Devin vs OpenMausBot
- Droid CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Pi vs OpenMausBot
- Gemini CLI vs OpenMausBot
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenMausBot
- goose vs OpenMausBot
- Harness² vs OpenMausBot
- HarnessRouter vs OpenMausBot
- Jules vs OpenMausBot
- Junie CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kilo Code CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kiro CLI vs OpenMausBot
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenMausBot
- MiniMax Code vs OpenMausBot
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Muse Code vs OpenMausBot
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenMausBot
- OpenCode vs OpenMausBot
- OpenHands vs OpenMausBot
- CLI Manager vs Crush
- CLI Manager vs OpenMausBot
- Crush vs Harness
- Crush vs Paperclip
- Crush vs Parallax
- Harness vs OpenMausBot
- OpenMausBot vs Paperclip
- OpenMausBot vs Parallax
- OpenMausBot vs Prime Agent
- OpenMausBot vs Qoder CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Qwen Code
- OpenMausBot vs Mirror CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Unstoppable
- OpenMausBot vs Vibe-Trading
- OpenMausBot vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/crush-vs-openmausbot.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/crush.json·/api/v1/tools/openmausbot.json - From a terminal
anchor compare crush openmausbot(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "crush", "b": "openmausbot"}at/mcp, no key