# Crush vs OpenMausBot (slim)

> OpenMausBot scores 65.4 (B) to Crush's 56.7 (C) for agent harnesses. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-openmausbot.md (~3,750 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-openmausbot.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-openmausbot
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-30
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

OpenMausBot scores 65.4 (B) on agent readiness against Crush's 56.7 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Crush leads on payments & pricing and maintenance & community. Both do agent harnesses.

- Crush: C 56.7, rank #744 of 1239 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/crush.min.md
- OpenMausBot: B 65.4, rank #368 of 1239 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/openmausbot.min.md
- Crush, good for Developers who want a Go terminal agent with a wide provider list, local models and Claude Code-compatible hooks. Ahead on Payments & pricing, 55 against 50; Maintenance & community, 82 against 74.
- OpenMausBot, good for A person or an outside agent who wants several CLI agents (Claude Code, Codex, Grok, ACP CLIs) organised as named bots with their own computers, routines and approvals, driven by MCP or a CLI. Ahead on Reliability, 60 against 54; Schema & documentation, 90 against 65; Agent ergonomics, 77 against 52; Security & auth, 59 against 44. Also Runs on your own machine; Open source.

| Category | Crush | OpenMausBot |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 54 | 60 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 65 | 90 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 52 | 77 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 44 | 59 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 55 | 50 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 82 | 74 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 59 | 59 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Crush | OpenMausBot |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Charm | Supamaus Software Private Limited |
| Transports |  | stdio |
| Licence | FSL-1.1-MIT (source-available, each release converts to MIT two years after it is made available) | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | 20 |
| Last release | 2026-10-09 | 2026-10-30 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-10-10 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-10-18 |
| Customer content may train models |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 29k stars, 5.6k npm/wk | 8.2k stars, 3.5k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | none |