Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Crush vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) scores 59.8 (C) on agent readiness against Crush's 56.5 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Crush leads on payments & pricing. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Crush C
Best for Developers who want a Go terminal agent with a wide provider list, local models and Claude Code-compatible hooks.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 55 against 20
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
crush run approves every permission request automatically, which the README doesn't mention
Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) C
Best for Teams that want one agent across an interactive terminal session and API-started cloud runs, including Claude Code and Codex runs on Warp's infrastructure or their own workers.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 89 against 65
- Agent ergonomics, 66 against 52
- Security & auth, 52 against 44
- Transparency & trust, 72 against 56
Also in its favour
- Open source
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
The warp CLI has no print or headless mode. Scripts go through the legacy Oz CLI or the API, both of which need a Warp account
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Crush | Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 54 | 52 | Crush +2 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 65 | 89 | Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) +24 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 52 | 66 | Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) +14 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 44 | 52 | Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 55 | 20 | Crush +35 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 84 | Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 56 | 72 | Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) +16 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -1 | |
| Total | C 56.5/100 | C 59.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Crush | Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Charm | Warp |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | FSL-1.1-MIT (source-available, each release converts to MIT two years after it is made available) | Mixed. The client, including the warp and oz binaries, is AGPL-3.0 with the warpui_core and warpui crates under MIT. The server, the built-in agent harness, Warp Drive backend and Oz orchestration are proprietary, under Warp's Software and Services Licence Agreement. The SDKs are Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-09 | 2026-10-15 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 29k stars, 5.6k npm/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Crush
Works with almost any provider or a local model and needs no Charm account. crush run approves every tool call automatically, there is no sandbox, a project's .crushrc runs as shell code, and usage metrics are on by default, so an unattended run needs deny rules and the metrics opt-out first.
Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
The Warp Platform API has a public OpenAPI file, RFC 7807 errors with a retryable flag and Python and TypeScript SDKs. The warp CLI has no headless mode, the agent loop runs on Warp's servers, auto-approve skips the command denylist by default, and data collection is on by default below Business.
Before you call either
Crush
- Add
permissions denyrules or a PreToolUse hook beforecrush run. It approves every permission request in its session - Read
.crushrc,crushrcandcrush.jsonin a cloned repository before running Crush there. They execute as shell code at startup - Set
CRUSH_DISABLE_METRICS=1orDO_NOT_TRACK=1to stop usage metrics to data.charm.land - Wrap
crush runin your own timeout. It has no turn, time or cost limit flag - Configure a provider by environment variable or
crushrcfirst. With none,crush runexits with an error asking for interactive setup
Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- For unattended work, call
POST https://app.warp.dev/api/v1/agent/runswithAuthorization: Bearer $WARP_API_KEY. ThewarpCLI is interactive only - Use an agent key, scoped to one cloud agent and given an expiry, for CI rather than a personal key. Keys are created in the Oz web app or the Warp app
- Set
auto_approve_bypasses_command_denylist = falseunder[agents.warp_agent.other]before startingwarp --auto-approve - Read
codeandretryablein error bodies. A 429resource_unavailablemeans capacity is full and the platform retries the task itself - Pin a version with
WARP_TUI_VERSIONat install, or setgeneral.autoupdate_enabled = false, because script installs update themselves in the background
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Crush or Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)?
Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) scores 59.8 (C) on agent readiness against Crush's 56.5 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Crush leads on payments & pricing.
Are Crush and Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) open source?
No open-source release is listed for Crush. Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) is open source (Mixed. The client, including the `warp` and `oz` binaries, is AGPL-3.0 with the `warpui_core` and `warpui` crates under MIT. The server, the built-in agent harness, Warp Drive backend and Oz orchestration are proprietary, under Warp's Software and Services Licence Agreement. The SDKs are Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Crush or Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Agent Zero vs Crush
- Agent Zero vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Aider vs Crush
- Aider vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Amp vs Crush
- Amp vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Antigravity CLI vs Crush
- Antigravity CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Auggie CLI vs Crush
- Auggie CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Claude Code vs Crush
- Claude Code vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Cline vs Crush
- Cline vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Crush vs Cursor CLI
- Crush vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Crush vs Devin
- Crush vs Droid CLI
- Crush vs Pi
- Crush vs Gemini CLI
- Crush vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Crush vs goose
- Crush vs Harness²
- Crush vs HarnessRouter
- Crush vs Jules
- Crush vs Junie CLI
- Crush vs Kilo Code CLI
- Crush vs Kimi Code CLI
- Crush vs Kiro CLI
- Crush vs mini-swe-agent
- Crush vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Crush vs Muse Code
- Crush vs OpenAI Codex
- Crush vs OpenCode
- Crush vs OpenHands
- Crush vs Prime Agent
- Crush vs Qoder CLI
- Crush vs Qwen Code
- Crush vs Mirror CLI
- Crush vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Cursor CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Devin vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Droid CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Pi vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Gemini CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- goose vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Harness² vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- HarnessRouter vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Jules vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Junie CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Kilo Code CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Kimi Code CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Kiro CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- mini-swe-agent vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Muse Code vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- OpenAI Codex vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- OpenCode vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- OpenHands vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Prime Agent vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Qoder CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Qwen Code vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Mirror CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Rovo Dev CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs Crush
- CLI Manager vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Crush vs Harness
- Crush vs Paperclip
- Crush vs Parallax
- Harness vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Paperclip vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Parallax vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/crush-vs-warp.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/crush.json·/api/v1/tools/warp.json - From a terminal
anchor compare crush warp(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "crush", "b": "warp"}at/mcp, no key