Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Crush vs Mistral Vibe CLI
Mistral Vibe CLI scores 62.9 (B) on agent readiness against Crush's 56.5 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Crush leads on maintenance & community. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Crush C
Best for Developers who want a Go terminal agent with a wide provider list, local models and Claude Code-compatible hooks.
Ahead on
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 75
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Mistral Vibe CLI loses 8 points for them
Watch for
crush run approves every permission request automatically, which the README doesn't mention
Best for Developers and CI jobs that want an open-source harness tuned for Mistral models, with hard per-run budgets and an export file, or a local model with no account.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 69 against 54
- Schema & documentation, 76 against 65
- Agent ergonomics, 84 against 52
- Security & auth, 58 against 44
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 55
- Transparency & trust, 79 against 56
Also in its favour
- Open source
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
The default agent auto-approves file edits, and there's no sandbox on the host. Isolation needs the experimental --agent-socket server or a container
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Crush | Mistral Vibe CLI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 54 | 69 | Mistral Vibe CLI +15 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 65 | 76 | Mistral Vibe CLI +11 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 52 | 84 | Mistral Vibe CLI +32 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 44 | 58 | Mistral Vibe CLI +14 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 55 | 60 | Mistral Vibe CLI +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 75 | Crush +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 56 | 79 | Mistral Vibe CLI +23 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -8 | |
| Total | C 56.5/100 | B 62.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Crush | Mistral Vibe CLI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Charm | Mistral AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | FSL-1.1-MIT (source-available, each release converts to MIT two years after it is made available) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-09 | 2026-10-09 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-09-25 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-09-03 |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 29k stars, 5.6k npm/wk | 5.1k stars, 332k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Crush
Works with almost any provider or a local model and needs no Charm account. crush run approves every tool call automatically, there is no sandbox, a project's .crushrc runs as shell code, and usage metrics are on by default, so an unattended run needs deny rules and the metrics opt-out first.
Mistral Vibe CLI
Apache-2.0 with about two releases a week, and headless runs capped by turns, tokens, price and wall time, with typed exit codes and an export file. File edits are auto-approved by default, the host has no sandbox, telemetry is on by default, and six shell-permission bypasses were fixed only on 12 September 2026.
Before you call either
Crush
- Add
permissions denyrules or a PreToolUse hook beforecrush run. It approves every permission request in its session - Read
.crushrc,crushrcandcrush.jsonin a cloned repository before running Crush there. They execute as shell code at startup - Set
CRUSH_DISABLE_METRICS=1orDO_NOT_TRACK=1to stop usage metrics to data.charm.land - Wrap
crush runin your own timeout. It has no turn, time or cost limit flag - Configure a provider by environment variable or
crushrcfirst. With none,crush runexits with an error asking for interactive setup
Mistral Vibe CLI
- Pass
--agenton every-prun (planis read-only). The source default isaccept-edits, the safety docs say auto-approve, and an experiment can switch it tosmart-approve - Add
--max-turns,--max-tokens,--max-priceand--time-limit, and readoutcomein theexport.jsonthat--output-dirwrites. Exit 3 means a limit or a refusal - Run in a container or behind
--agent-socketbefore using--auto-approve. Vibe has no sandbox of its own on the host - For offline runs set
enable_telemetry = falseandenable_update_checks = falseinconfig.toml. The docs'enable_auto_updateisn't the key the code reads - Use 2.25.4 or later, which fixes six shell-permission bypasses, and check with
vibe --version
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Crush or Mistral Vibe CLI?
Mistral Vibe CLI scores 62.9 (B) on agent readiness against Crush's 56.5 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Crush leads on maintenance & community.
Are Crush and Mistral Vibe CLI open source?
No open-source release is listed for Crush. Mistral Vibe CLI is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Crush or Mistral Vibe CLI
- Agent Zero vs Crush
- Agent Zero vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Aider vs Crush
- Aider vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Amp vs Crush
- Amp vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Crush
- Antigravity CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Crush
- Auggie CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Claude Code vs Crush
- Claude Code vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Cline vs Crush
- Cline vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Crush vs Cursor CLI
- Crush vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Crush vs Devin
- Crush vs Droid CLI
- Crush vs Pi
- Crush vs Gemini CLI
- Crush vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Crush vs goose
- Crush vs Harness²
- Crush vs HarnessRouter
- Crush vs Jules
- Crush vs Junie CLI
- Crush vs Kilo Code CLI
- Crush vs Kimi Code CLI
- Crush vs Kiro CLI
- Crush vs mini-swe-agent
- Crush vs Muse Code
- Crush vs OpenAI Codex
- Crush vs OpenCode
- Crush vs OpenHands
- Crush vs Prime Agent
- Crush vs Qoder CLI
- Crush vs Qwen Code
- Crush vs Mirror CLI
- Crush vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Crush vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Cursor CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Devin vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Droid CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Pi vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Gemini CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- goose vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Harness² vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Jules vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Junie CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Kilo Code CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Kiro CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Muse Code
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs OpenCode
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs OpenHands
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Prime Agent
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Qwen Code
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Mirror CLI
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs Crush
- CLI Manager vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Crush vs Harness
- Crush vs Paperclip
- Crush vs Parallax
- Harness vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Paperclip
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/crush-vs-mistral-vibe-cli.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/crush.json·/api/v1/tools/mistral-vibe-cli.json - From a terminal
anchor compare crush mistral-vibe-cli(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "crush", "b": "mistral-vibe-cli"}at/mcp, no key