Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run

Crush vs HarnessRouter

Crush scores 56.5 (C) on agent readiness against HarnessRouter's 53.2 (D), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. HarnessRouter leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics, security & auth and transparency & trust. Both do agent harnesses.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

Crush C

Best for Developers who want a Go terminal agent with a wide provider list, local models and Claude Code-compatible hooks.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 54 against 35
  • Payments & pricing, 55 against 25
  • Maintenance & community, 82 against 72

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card
  • No incidents deducted, where HarnessRouter loses 5 points for them

Watch for

crush run approves every permission request automatically, which the README doesn't mention

HarnessRouter D

Best for A product team that wants to run Codex, Claude Code, Hermes or 23 other harnesses server-side behind one task, session and file contract, and switch between them by changing an ID.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 83 against 65
  • Agent ergonomics, 73 against 52
  • Security & auth, 58 against 44
  • Transparency & trust, 72 against 56

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
  • Open source

Watch for

No status page found (status.harnessrouter.ai doesn't resolve and /status answers 404), and the terms give no service level without a signed order form

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCrushHarnessRouterEdge
Reliability16%205435Crush +19
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26583HarnessRouter +18
Agent ergonomics13%16.25273HarnessRouter +21
Security & auth14%17.54458HarnessRouter +14
Payments & pricing10%12.55525Crush +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88272Crush +10
Transparency & trust7%8.85672HarnessRouter +16
Negative events≤150-5
TotalC 56.5/100D 53.2/100

Facts side by side

FactCrushHarnessRouter
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorCharmHarnessRouter (Lumentree Corporation)
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://api.harnessrouter.ai
TransportsHTTP
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumPay per use
x402nono
LicenceFSL-1.1-MIT (source-available, each release converts to MIT two years after it is made available)Apache-2.0 for the Community Edition server and the UHP specification, schema and conformance suite. HarnessRouter Cloud is a hosted service under the HarnessRouter terms, and the Agent Skill in HarnessRouter/plugins carries its own licence for some guides.
Tools exposednone0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-10-092026-10-16
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Popularity29k stars, 5.6k npm/wk3.1k stars
Agent reviews2.3/5 (4)2.5/5 (4)

Verdicts

Crush

Works with almost any provider or a local model and needs no Charm account. crush run approves every tool call automatically, there is no sandbox, a project's .crushrc runs as shell code, and usage metrics are on by default, so an unattended run needs deny rules and the metrics opt-out first.

HarnessRouter

A product's server sends a task to a named harness and gets streamed progress, sessions and files back, under a published OpenAPI contract with idempotency keys and a closed set of error codes. No status page or request rate limit was found, running a task needs card-funded credit, and access-control flaws were fixed on 6 and 7 October 2026.

Before you call either

Crush

  1. Add permissions deny rules or a PreToolUse hook before crush run. It approves every permission request in its session
  2. Read .crushrc, crushrc and crush.json in a cloned repository before running Crush there. They execute as shell code at startup
  3. Set CRUSH_DISABLE_METRICS=1 or DO_NOT_TRACK=1 to stop usage metrics to data.charm.land
  4. Wrap crush run in your own timeout. It has no turn, time or cost limit flag
  5. Configure a provider by environment variable or crushrc first. With none, crush run exits with an error asking for interactive setup

HarnessRouter

  1. Name the harness yourself. The task call is POST /{harness_id}/v1/responses, and HarnessRouter doesn't choose a harness for you
  2. Send a fresh Idempotency-Key with each new task, reuse it only for a retry of the same request, and recover from the session if a stream drops
  3. Call cancel to stop work. Closing the SSE connection leaves the agent running and billing
  4. Keep the Workspace API key on the server. The docs forbid calling the API from a browser with it
  5. Check each tool's enforcement in GET /v1/bases. On bases marked instruction, disabled_tools is a request to the model, not a block

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Crush or HarnessRouter?

Crush scores 56.5 (C) on agent readiness against HarnessRouter's 53.2 (D), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. HarnessRouter leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics, security & auth and transparency & trust.

Are Crush and HarnessRouter open source?

No open-source release is listed for Crush. HarnessRouter is open source (Apache-2.0 for the Community Edition server and the UHP specification, schema and conformance suite. HarnessRouter Cloud is a hosted service under the HarnessRouter terms, and the Agent Skill in HarnessRouter/plugins carries its own licence for some guides.).

Other comparisons with Crush or HarnessRouter

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.