Head to head · Multi-agent orchestration · October 2026 research run
Clawboo vs HarnessRouter
Clawboo scores 61.4 (C) on agent readiness against HarnessRouter's 53.3 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. HarnessRouter leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do multi-agent orchestration.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 955 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Clawboo C
Best for One person on one computer who wants several coding and general agents on one board, with shared memory and a lead agent that routes work.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 52 against 35
- Security & auth, 70 against 58
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 25
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
Claude Code runs in bypassPermissions, Codex with danger-full-access and Hermes with --yolo, with no setting to change it and no sandbox
Best for A product team that wants to run Codex, Claude Code, Hermes or 23 other harnesses server-side behind one task, session and file contract, and switch between them by changing an ID.
Ahead on
- Maintenance & community, 72 against 51
- Transparency & trust, 73 against 58
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No status page found (status.harnessrouter.ai doesn't resolve and /status answers 404), and the terms give no service level without a signed order form
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Payments & pricing Clawboo +35
Clawboo 60
No payment protocol (0). Read with the self-hosted rule. Free under MIT with nothing to buy (20). No card and no Clawboo account (20). One npx command installs and starts it with no sign-up (20). Model costs belong to the providers the owner connects.
HarnessRouter 25
Published rubric, for the hosted service. No machine payment protocol (0). Per-unit prices without a login, agent work per active minute and model calls at listed provider prices per million tokens (20). The Free plan needs no card, but it only configures agents, and running a task draws on card-funded credit, so 5 of 20. A person signs up in a browser and creates the key in the console (0). 25 in all. Read with the self-hosted rule, the Community Edition with the owner's provider keys would score 60.
Maintenance & community HarnessRouter +21
Clawboo 51
0.5.0 was published to npm on 21 October 2026 (30). Two releases in the 90 days to 1 November 2026, 0.4.0 on 28 September and 0.5.0, below the three the line asks for (0). github.com was unreachable, so replies to issues, pull requests and Discussions are unchecked. The CI file cites issue #140 as fixed (3). One public npm package, current, with no entry in the official MCP registry for its four servers (10). CI, CodeQL, weekly Dependabot and SLSA provenance on 0.4.0 and 0.5.0, with @composio/client pinned to an alpha (8).
HarnessRouter 72
Open-source reading of the repository behind the hosted service. Last tag v0.34.2 on 16 October 2026 (30). 202 tags between 15 August and 16 October (20). GitHub's issue pages and API refused this session, so open issues and reply times are unchecked. Pull requests from at least ten outside authors were merged in the 30 days to 17 October, by the git history (15 of 25). No official SDK and no MCP server to register (0). A tests workflow runs every suite on each pull request and push to main, with a release workflow and a Docker image, but whether the default branch passes is unchecked (7 of 10). 72 in all.
Reliability Clawboo +17
Clawboo 52
Read as local software. The official npm package clawboo states Node.js 22.12 or newer, and the README says macOS, Linux and Windows are supported (20). ci.yml runs lint, typecheck, Vitest and a real-concurrency suite on Linux and platform suites on Windows and macOS, and publish.yml reruns build, lint, typecheck, tests and a clean-install boot before it publishes. 0.5.0 carries provenance from that workflow on main, so its checks passed at that commit, but run results on main couldn't be read (15). github.com was unreachable, so open crash and regression issues are unchecked. A known-issues page lists 25 entries with a status each, three of them fixed on main (5). Changesets write a changelog entry per release, and removals and the 0.2.0 database reset are called out, though breaking changes arrive in minor versions before 1.0 (12). Version 0.5.0, and SECURITY.md says pre-1.0 (0).
HarnessRouter 35
Hosted reading, for HarnessRouter Cloud at api.harnessrouter.ai. No status page (status.harnessrouter.ai doesn't resolve and harnessrouter.ai/status answers 404), so 0 for the page and 5 for an unreadable incident record. No request rate limit with numbers was found. The pricing page states one task at a time on Free, unlimited concurrency on plans with brief queueing and a 30-minute or 1-hour task limit on Free, so 5 of 15. 429 is in the error table as rate_limited with Retry-After (UHP Errors §3), quota_exhausted is marked not worth retrying, and every task call takes an Idempotency-Key with a rule to recover the session rather than resend after a dropped stream (15). Terms §5.4 give no service level outside a signed order form (0). The task API isn't labelled beta, while tracing and agent memory are, and the protocol is a draft standard (10). 35 in all.
Transparency & trust HarnessRouter +15
Clawboo 58
MIT, Copyright 2026 Sanreds, with a third-party notices file (30). The docs list every file Clawboo writes, which copies of keys are encrypted and which are plain text, retention for stored tool results (7 days) and pending approvals (24 hours), and that prompts go only to connected providers. There is no privacy statement, and the website wasn't read (22). The 0.1.x line is deprecated on npm with a note in the changelog, and removals are dated in release notes, with no written deprecation policy or notice period (10). No telemetry, with the server's own outbound requests disclosed, though the npm update check has no setting (18).
HarnessRouter 73
Editorial half. The server, specification, schema and conformance suite are Apache-2.0. The Cloud's own billing and deployment wasn't confirmed to match the open code, and the Agent Skill has a custom licence for some guides (25 of 30). The privacy policy, DPA, subprocessor list and a retention page agree. Customer content isn't used for training without an opt-in, and periods are stated (tasks deleted at once, agents and files after 30 days, backups within 14 days, credentials within 90, free-plan task records 7 days). The privacy policy gives no periods of its own (24 of 30). UHP's versioning page says how a field is deprecated and that the previous version SHOULD be supported for six months. No dated product deprecation notices found (14 of 20). Subprocessors listed with purpose and location (Azure, Stripe, Vercel, Supabase, all United States), but the routing and inference gateway provider is named only on request (15 of 20). 78 in all.
Security & auth Clawboo +12
Clawboo 70
Harness reading of the framework checklist, as for the other harnesses. 30 for what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. The docs say Clawboo sends no telemetry and list the GitHub catalogue fetch, the npm version check, OpenRouter's public model list, Google Fonts and the GitHub star count, of which only the catalogue address can be changed (27). Clawboo Native shell commands are off by default and asked one at a time, and connector grants are per agent with approval on writes. Claude Code, Codex and Hermes run with their prompts and sandboxes off and no setting to change it, they can read Clawboo's database and key vault, and with no access token by default any local program can answer approval cards (8). Images in agent text don't load on their own, peer posts are marked as evidence, and a run that has read private data and untrusted content asks before any outbound connector call (11). An audit log of budget, breaker, approval, verification, tool-call and install events, with secrets masked (13). SECURITY.md with private reporting, CodeQL, Dependabot and npm provenance. No security.txt or bug bounty, OSV lists no advisory for clawboo, and the proxy advisory is on the docs with a workaround while its fix is unreleased (11).
HarnessRouter 58
Hosted reading. Bearer Workspace API keys, revocable at once through the API, held to one workspace or reaching the organisation, with harness-bound calibration credentials. No OAuth, per-endpoint scopes or expiry found (20 of 30). Least privilege 10 of 20. disabled_tools per configured agent, enforced by the runtime only where GET /v1/bases says hard, and per-turn cost and step caps, with no approval step for actions a harness takes. Prompt injection 10 of 15. UHP Security §4 puts injection in scope for the client, tells servers to keep harnesses that read untrusted input separate and forbids claiming an agent is safe on untrusted input, and secret values are redacted from responses, streams and traces. Operator visibility 10 of 15. A cost breakdown per task on every plan, and the step-by-step trace is beta, included in Scale or $50 a month. Security programme 8 of 20. A disclosure policy with safe harbour and no bounty, SECURITY.md with GitHub private reporting and a 10-working-day acknowledgement aim, GHSA identifiers cited in public fix commits, no security.txt and no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 found. 58 in all.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Clawboo | HarnessRouter | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 52 | 35 | Clawboo +17 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 83 | 83 | even |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 75 | 73 | Clawboo +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 70 | 58 | Clawboo +12 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 25 | Clawboo +35 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 51 | 72 | HarnessRouter +21 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 58 | 73 | HarnessRouter +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -4 | -5 | |
| Total | C 61.4/100 | D 53.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Clawboo | HarnessRouter |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Sanreds | HarnessRouter (Lumentree Corporation) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.harnessrouter.ai |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 for the Community Edition server and the UHP specification, schema and conformance suite. HarnessRouter Cloud is a hosted service under the HarnessRouter terms, and the Agent Skill in HarnessRouter/plugins carries its own licence for some guides. |
| Tools exposed | none | 0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-07-30 |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | yes, with an opt-out |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | yes |
| Popularity | 100 npm/wk | 3.1k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
Clawboo
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Clawboo
Tasks, memory, team chat and connectors are shared across five runtimes through four MCP servers, with documentation that states each default and limit. Claude Code, Codex and Hermes run with their sandboxes and approval prompts off and no setting to change it, and a reverse-proxy exposure of the MCP servers is fixed only on the unreleased main branch.
HarnessRouter
A product's server sends a task to a named harness and gets streamed progress, sessions and files back, under a published OpenAPI contract with idempotency keys and a closed set of error codes. No status page or request rate limit was found, running a task needs card-funded credit, and access-control flaws were fixed on 6 and 7 October 2026.
Before you call either
Clawboo
- Run
npx clawboo@latest, not a barenpx clawboo, which can reuse an older cached build. Node.js 22.12 or newer is required - On 0.5.0 behind nginx, Caddy or a Cloudflare Tunnel, deny
/api/mcp/at the proxy and setSTUDIO_ACCESS_TOKENfromopenssl rand -hex 24 - Give Claude Code, Codex and Hermes teammates only work you would let run unattended, or run Clawboo under a separate user account or VM
- Create a hard-cap budget in Settings > Insights > Governance before long runs. A fresh install has no budget and new budgets only warn
- Install
@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdkglobally beside Clawboo for Claude Code teammates. A one-offnpxrun cannot load it
HarnessRouter
- Name the harness yourself. The task call is POST /{harness_id}/v1/responses, and HarnessRouter doesn't choose a harness for you
- Send a fresh Idempotency-Key with each new task, reuse it only for a retry of the same request, and recover from the session if a stream drops
- Call cancel to stop work. Closing the SSE connection leaves the agent running and billing
- Keep the Workspace API key on the server. The docs forbid calling the API from a browser with it
- Check each tool's enforcement in GET /v1/bases. On bases marked instruction, disabled_tools is a request to the model, not a block
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Clawboo or HarnessRouter?
Clawboo scores 61.4 (C) on agent readiness against HarnessRouter's 53.3 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. HarnessRouter leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Are Clawboo and HarnessRouter open source?
Yes. Clawboo is open source (MIT). HarnessRouter is open source (Apache-2.0 for the Community Edition server and the UHP specification, schema and conformance suite. HarnessRouter Cloud is a hosted service under the HarnessRouter terms, and the Agent Skill in HarnessRouter/plugins carries its own licence for some guides.).
Other comparisons with Clawboo or HarnessRouter
- Agent Zero vs HarnessRouter
- Aider vs HarnessRouter
- Amp vs HarnessRouter
- Antigravity CLI vs HarnessRouter
- Auggie CLI vs HarnessRouter
- Claude Code vs HarnessRouter
- Cline vs HarnessRouter
- Crush vs HarnessRouter
- Cursor CLI vs HarnessRouter
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs HarnessRouter
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs HarnessRouter
- Devin vs HarnessRouter
- Droid CLI vs HarnessRouter
- Pi vs HarnessRouter
- Gemini CLI vs HarnessRouter
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs HarnessRouter
- goose vs HarnessRouter
- Harness² vs HarnessRouter
- HarnessRouter vs Jules
- HarnessRouter vs Junie CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Kilo Code CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Kimi Code CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Kiro CLI
- HarnessRouter vs mini-swe-agent
- HarnessRouter vs MiniMax Code
- HarnessRouter vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Muse Code
- HarnessRouter vs OpenAI Codex
- HarnessRouter vs OpenCode
- HarnessRouter vs OpenHands
- HarnessRouter vs OpenMausBot
- HarnessRouter vs Prime Agent
- HarnessRouter vs Qoder CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Qwen Code
- HarnessRouter vs Mirror CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Rovo Dev CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Unstoppable
- HarnessRouter vs Vibe-Trading
- HarnessRouter vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Amp vs Clawboo
- Antigravity CLI vs Clawboo
- Auggie CLI vs Clawboo
- Claude Code vs Clawboo
- Clawboo vs CLI Manager
- Clawboo vs Cline
- Clawboo vs Crush
- Clawboo vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Clawboo vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Clawboo vs Devin
- Clawboo vs Droid CLI
- Clawboo vs Gemini CLI
- Clawboo vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Clawboo vs goose
- Clawboo vs Harness
- Clawboo vs Jules
- Clawboo vs Junie CLI
- Clawboo vs Kilo Code CLI
- Clawboo vs Kimi Code CLI
- Clawboo vs Kiro CLI
- Clawboo vs MiniMax Code
- Clawboo vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Clawboo vs Muse Code
- Clawboo vs OpenCode
- Clawboo vs OpenHands
- Clawboo vs OpenMausBot
- Clawboo vs Paperclip
- Clawboo vs Parallax
- Clawboo vs Prime Agent
- Clawboo vs Qoder CLI
- Clawboo vs Qwen Code
- Clawboo vs Mirror CLI
- Clawboo vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Clawboo vs Unstoppable
- Clawboo vs Vibe-Trading
- Clawboo vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs HarnessRouter
- Harness vs HarnessRouter
- HarnessRouter vs Paperclip
- HarnessRouter vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/clawboo-vs-harnessrouter.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/clawboo.json·/api/v1/tools/harnessrouter.json - From a terminal
anchor compare clawboo harnessrouter(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "clawboo", "b": "harnessrouter"}at/mcp, no key