Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
AXLR vs HarnessRouter
AXLR scores 70.6 (BB) on agent readiness against HarnessRouter's 53.3 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. HarnessRouter leads on transparency & trust. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 1000 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
AXLR BB
Best for A program or bot that needs one governed execution at a time, with a policy, a budget, a sandbox profile and correlation ids it sets itself and a result object it reads back, on a machine it controls, with the model on OpenRouter, a local server or a native Anthropic or OpenAI key.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 35
- Agent ergonomics, 83 against 73
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 25
- Maintenance & community, 79 against 72
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Free to start without a card
- No incidents deducted, where HarnessRouter loses 5 points for them
Watch for
The setup assistant turns autonomy on and leaves the exec sandbox off, so after setup the model's commands run with the person's rights, bar the destructive list
Best for A product team that wants to run Codex, Claude Code, Hermes or 23 other harnesses server-side behind one task, session and file contract, and switch between them by changing an ID.
Ahead on
- Transparency & trust, 73 against 55
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No status page found (status.harnessrouter.ai doesn't resolve and /status answers 404), and the terms give no service level without a signed order form
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reliability AXLR +35
AXLR 70
Read as a local package, as claude-code, goose, opencode and openhands were. Release archives for Linux, macOS and Windows on amd64 and arm64 with a .sha256 beside each, a GHCR image, an OCI Helm chart and source builds with Go 1.26, all stated in the docs; no Homebrew, npm or apt route (20). CI on main runs vet, race tests and a coverage gate above 80 per cent for both modules, with the sandbox tests required under bubblewrap, and the last ten runs on main to 1 November 2026 all passed; the release workflow tests on six native runners (25). 10 open issues, all opened by the founder on 19 and 21 October 2026 as trackers for service work (work modes, plugins, the sandbox setting, cost limits), none from an outside user and none a crash report, 0 open pull requests and about 100 merged; with 0 stars there is nobody else to report, so the handling of outside reports is untested (20). Tags are semver 0.x and the docs date each behaviour change inline ("until 14 October 2026…"), but the 21 releases have empty notes, there is no CHANGELOG.md, and the product contract records one retirement (the seven 1.0 skill definitions on 5 October 2026) without a notice period (5). Pre-1.0, which the README calls an evolving project (0). 20+25+20+5+0 = 70.
HarnessRouter 35
Hosted reading, for HarnessRouter Cloud at api.harnessrouter.ai. No status page (status.harnessrouter.ai doesn't resolve and harnessrouter.ai/status answers 404), so 0 for the page and 5 for an unreadable incident record. No request rate limit with numbers was found. The pricing page states one task at a time on Free, unlimited concurrency on plans with brief queueing and a 30-minute or 1-hour task limit on Free, so 5 of 15. 429 is in the error table as rate_limited with Retry-After (UHP Errors §3), quota_exhausted is marked not worth retrying, and every task call takes an Idempotency-Key with a rule to recover the session rather than resend after a dropped stream (15). Terms §5.4 give no service level outside a signed order form (0). The task API isn't labelled beta, while tracing and agent memory are, and the protocol is a draft standard (10). 35 in all.
Payments & pricing AXLR +35
AXLR 60
No payment protocol (0). Free and Apache-2.0 with nothing to buy, so 20, 20 and 20 on the last three lines by the self-hosted rule, since the docs say what you pay your model provider, the free route needs no card, and it runs local models with no signup at all, the JSON worker without any model. 0+20+20+20 = 60.
HarnessRouter 25
Published rubric, for the hosted service. No machine payment protocol (0). Per-unit prices without a login, agent work per active minute and model calls at listed provider prices per million tokens (20). The Free plan needs no card, but it only configures agents, and running a task draws on card-funded credit, so 5 of 20. A person signs up in a browser and creates the key in the console (0). 25 in all. Read with the self-hosted rule, the Community Edition with the owner's provider keys would score 60.
Transparency & trust HarnessRouter +18
AXLR 55
Apache-2.0 with a NOTICE (30). No privacy policy or terms on underpassai.com or axlr.underpassai.com; the docs' 'Where data goes' and 'Diagnostics and privacy' sections say that model requests go to OpenRouter, the local server or the native API, that Jev sends text to TypeSafe only when on, that sessions live under $XDG_STATE_HOME/axlr, that payload capture is off by default and redacted when on, and that traces are deleted after 30 days; nothing covers the engine downloads' or the catalog registry's handling of a client's requests (15). No deprecation policy; pre-1.0 changes are dated inline in the docs and the product contract records the 5 October 2026 retirement of the first skill catalogue after the fact (6). No telemetry to disclose, and the docs say in two places what leaves the machine and how to stop payload capture, though no single page says there is no telemetry (17). 30+15+6+17 = 68.
HarnessRouter 73
Editorial half. The server, specification, schema and conformance suite are Apache-2.0. The Cloud's own billing and deployment wasn't confirmed to match the open code, and the Agent Skill has a custom licence for some guides (25 of 30). The privacy policy, DPA, subprocessor list and a retention page agree. Customer content isn't used for training without an opt-in, and periods are stated (tasks deleted at once, agents and files after 30 days, backups within 14 days, credentials within 90, free-plan task records 7 days). The privacy policy gives no periods of its own (24 of 30). UHP's versioning page says how a field is deprecated and that the previous version SHOULD be supported for six months. No dated product deprecation notices found (14 of 20). Subprocessors listed with purpose and location (Azure, Stripe, Vercel, Supabase, all United States), but the routing and inference gateway provider is named only on request (15 of 20). 78 in all.
Agent ergonomics AXLR +10
AXLR 83
Harness reading of the framework line, scored on what a program driving it has to supply. Six local tools plus the host's bookkeeping tools; work modes and an execution policy hide the tools a run may not use, axlr_catalog searches the catalog instead of loading it, forged tools keep the request prefix for the prompt cache, and a context cap of 75,000 prompt tokens opens a successor session (20). local_read, local_search and local_list page with offset, next_offset and max_bytes; StreamEvents takes after, max_events (1 to 256) and wait_ms; a budget per execution in seconds, requests, tool calls and dollars; 32 tool calls a turn and max_session_usd (20). The --exec run ends in one result line with a status, the pending call, every call's outcome and the usage, and exits 0, 3 or 1; service errors carry codes an agent can act on; a budget stop says which limit (budget: requests 20 reached) and leaves the session resumable (16). Idempotency-Key on every turn, approval and direct call with cross-transport replay, expected_revision on decisions, expected_sha256 on worker writes, and an interrupted effectful call left uncertain for an operator rather than retried (19). One command runs a task, but the first launch needs an OpenRouter key or a local server, the service needs a CA, a principals file and remote KMP and MADE before a first session, and the only SDK is the Go library (8). 20+20+16+19+8 = 83.
HarnessRouter 73
API reading. Sessions, turns and files are separate reads, and list endpoints take limit and cursor, but there's no field selection on a response (15 of 25). Cursor paging on session and memory lists with a bounded limit, and few filters found (14 of 20). One error envelope with type, code, param and detail, a closed code set, a retry rule per code and a 422 that lists every failed field without echoing the body (18 of 20). Idempotency-Key on task creation, reuse only for the same request, recover from the session after a drop, and an explicit cancel because closing the stream doesn't stop work (18 of 20). Only input is required to run a task, and budgets default to 400 steps, 7,200 seconds and $10. No official SDK, only the OpenAI Responses shape, clients generated from the OpenAPI file and an Agent Skill (8 of 15). 73 in all.
Maintenance & community AXLR +7
AXLR 79
v0.15.0 on 2026-10-25, with commits on main to 2026-11-01 (30). 21 releases between 4 and 25 October 2026 (20). One maintainer (368 of 399 commits, the rest by two agent accounts), 10 open issues that are his own trackers with no comments, about 100 merged pull requests and no outside report to measure a reply against (15). Not in the MCP registry; the Go module and a proto to generate clients from are the only client code, beside the GHCR image and Helm chart (5). Go 1.26 toolchain pinned, release actions pinned by commit SHA, a go-licenses check that the third-party bundle matches the dependency graph, and CI passing on main (9). 30+20+15+5+9 = 79.
HarnessRouter 72
Open-source reading of the repository behind the hosted service. Last tag v0.34.2 on 16 October 2026 (30). 202 tags between 15 August and 16 October (20). GitHub's issue pages and API refused this session, so open issues and reply times are unchecked. Pull requests from at least ten outside authors were merged in the 30 days to 17 October, by the git history (15 of 25). No official SDK and no MCP server to register (0). A tests workflow runs every suite on each pull request and push to main, with a release workflow and a Docker image, but whether the default branch passes is unchecked (7 of 10). 72 in all.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | AXLR | HarnessRouter | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 35 | AXLR +35 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 80 | 83 | HarnessRouter +3 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 83 | 73 | AXLR +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 62 | 58 | AXLR +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 25 | AXLR +35 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 79 | 72 | AXLR +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 55 | 73 | HarnessRouter +18 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -5 | |
| Total | BB 70.6/100 | D 53.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | AXLR | HarnessRouter |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Underpass AI | HarnessRouter (Lumentree Corporation) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.harnessrouter.ai |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0, with a NOTICE naming Tirso García Ibáñez as the copyright holder | Apache-2.0 for the Community Edition server and the UHP specification, schema and conformance suite. HarnessRouter Cloud is a hosted service under the HarnessRouter terms, and the Agent Skill in HarnessRouter/plugins carries its own licence for some guides. |
| Tools exposed | none | 0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-25 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-07-30 |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | yes, with an opt-out |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | yes |
| Popularity | 0 stars | 3.1k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
AXLR
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
AXLR
A pre-1.0 Go harness with an unusually complete service contract, mutual TLS with principal roles, required idempotency keys, a policy, budget and sandbox per execution, and a result object a program can read. The console's defaults after setup are autonomy on and no sandbox, the project has one maintainer and no outside users yet, and releases carry no notes.
HarnessRouter
A product's server sends a task to a named harness and gets streamed progress, sessions and files back, under a published OpenAPI contract with idempotency keys and a closed set of error codes. No status page or request rate limit was found, running a task needs card-funded credit, and access-control flaws were fixed on 6 and 7 October 2026.
Before you call either
AXLR
- Before the first prompt, set
approvals.autonomousto false or run with--approve none, and turnexec_sandbox.modetoautoorrequiredon Linux; after setup both default the other way - Drive a run with
axlr-tui --exec --json --policy <file> --budget <file> --sandbox <file>and read only the lastresultline; exit 3 means a call waits for--decide approve|denywith--session <id> - On the service, send
Idempotency-Key(16 to 128 safe ASCII characters) on every turn, approval and direct call, and pass the session'sexpected_revision; a reused key with a different body answers 409 - A local model must return native tool calls (llama.cpp with
--jinja, vLLM with--enable-auto-tool-choice); setcontext_tokenson the entry andOLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTHfor Ollama - Leave
TYPESAFE_API_KEYunset unless you want the setup assistant to switch Jev on, which sends requests and final answers to TypeSafe
HarnessRouter
- Name the harness yourself. The task call is POST /{harness_id}/v1/responses, and HarnessRouter doesn't choose a harness for you
- Send a fresh Idempotency-Key with each new task, reuse it only for a retry of the same request, and recover from the session if a stream drops
- Call cancel to stop work. Closing the SSE connection leaves the agent running and billing
- Keep the Workspace API key on the server. The docs forbid calling the API from a browser with it
- Check each tool's enforcement in GET /v1/bases. On bases marked instruction, disabled_tools is a request to the model, not a block
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, AXLR or HarnessRouter?
AXLR scores 70.6 (BB) on agent readiness against HarnessRouter's 53.3 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. HarnessRouter leads on transparency & trust.
Are AXLR and HarnessRouter open source?
Yes. AXLR is open source (Apache-2.0, with a NOTICE naming Tirso García Ibáñez as the copyright holder). HarnessRouter is open source (Apache-2.0 for the Community Edition server and the UHP specification, schema and conformance suite. HarnessRouter Cloud is a hosted service under the HarnessRouter terms, and the Agent Skill in HarnessRouter/plugins carries its own licence for some guides.).
Other comparisons with AXLR or HarnessRouter
- Agent Zero vs AXLR
- Agent Zero vs HarnessRouter
- Aider vs AXLR
- Aider vs HarnessRouter
- Amp vs AXLR
- Amp vs HarnessRouter
- Antigravity CLI vs AXLR
- Antigravity CLI vs HarnessRouter
- Auggie CLI vs AXLR
- Auggie CLI vs HarnessRouter
- AXLR vs Claude Code
- AXLR vs Cline
- AXLR vs Crush
- AXLR vs Cursor CLI
- AXLR vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- AXLR vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- AXLR vs Devin
- AXLR vs Droid CLI
- AXLR vs Pi
- AXLR vs Gemini CLI
- AXLR vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- AXLR vs goose
- AXLR vs Harness²
- AXLR vs Jules
- AXLR vs Junie CLI
- AXLR vs Kilo Code CLI
- AXLR vs Kimi Code CLI
- AXLR vs Kiro CLI
- AXLR vs mini-swe-agent
- AXLR vs MiniMax Code
- AXLR vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- AXLR vs Muse Code
- AXLR vs OpenAI Codex
- AXLR vs OpenCode
- AXLR vs OpenHands
- AXLR vs OpenMausBot
- AXLR vs Prime Agent
- AXLR vs Qoder CLI
- AXLR vs Qwen Code
- AXLR vs Mirror CLI
- AXLR vs Rovo Dev CLI
- AXLR vs Unstoppable
- AXLR vs Vibe-Trading
- AXLR vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Claude Code vs HarnessRouter
- Cline vs HarnessRouter
- Crush vs HarnessRouter
- Cursor CLI vs HarnessRouter
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs HarnessRouter
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs HarnessRouter
- Devin vs HarnessRouter
- Droid CLI vs HarnessRouter
- Pi vs HarnessRouter
- Gemini CLI vs HarnessRouter
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs HarnessRouter
- goose vs HarnessRouter
- Harness² vs HarnessRouter
- HarnessRouter vs Jules
- HarnessRouter vs Junie CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Kilo Code CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Kimi Code CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Kiro CLI
- HarnessRouter vs mini-swe-agent
- HarnessRouter vs MiniMax Code
- HarnessRouter vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Muse Code
- HarnessRouter vs OpenAI Codex
- HarnessRouter vs OpenCode
- HarnessRouter vs OpenHands
- HarnessRouter vs OpenMausBot
- HarnessRouter vs Prime Agent
- HarnessRouter vs Qoder CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Qwen Code
- HarnessRouter vs Mirror CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Rovo Dev CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Unstoppable
- HarnessRouter vs Vibe-Trading
- HarnessRouter vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- AXLR vs Clawboo
- AXLR vs CLI Manager
- AXLR vs Harness
- AXLR vs Paperclip
- AXLR vs Parallax
- Clawboo vs HarnessRouter
- CLI Manager vs HarnessRouter
- Harness vs HarnessRouter
- HarnessRouter vs Paperclip
- HarnessRouter vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/axlr-vs-harnessrouter.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/axlr.json·/api/v1/tools/harnessrouter.json - From a terminal
anchor compare axlr harnessrouter(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "axlr", "b": "harnessrouter"}at/mcp, no key