Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
goose vs Rovo Dev CLI
goose scores 73.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Rovo Dev CLI's 43.9 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
goose BB
Best for People and pipelines that want one agent across many model providers or local models, with recipes for repeatable jobs and a desktop app for non-engineers.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 77 against 35
- Schema & documentation, 81 against 45
- Agent ergonomics, 82 against 53
- Security & auth, 77 against 48
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 15
- Maintenance & community, 86 against 61
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- No key needed to call it
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.5 against 2.0 out of 5
Watch for
Autonomous mode, which approves every tool call, is the default
Best for Teams already on Jira, Confluence and Bitbucket who want the agent to read and update work items and pages from the terminal or a pipeline.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Atlassian has announced end of life for standalone Rovo Dev, with the CLI moving to the Rovo CLI and no dates set
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | goose | Rovo Dev CLI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 77 | 35 | goose +42 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 81 | 45 | goose +36 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 82 | 53 | goose +29 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 77 | 48 | goose +29 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 15 | goose +45 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 86 | 61 | goose +25 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 63 | 61 | goose +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | BB 73.9/100 | E 43.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | goose | Rovo Dev CLI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Agentic AI Foundation (originally Block) | Atlassian |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary, under the Atlassian Customer Agreement (effective 1 October 2026) and the Atlassian AI Terms (effective 17 August 2026). No source is published |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-16 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 55k stars | none |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
goose
Telemetry off until the user opts in, with the collected fields listed. Autonomous mode, which approves every tool call, is the default.
Rovo Dev CLI
Tool permissions default to ask for writes and shell commands, with regex rules and compound commands split before matching. It needs a paid Atlassian plan with Rovo Dev, has no customer sandbox or public changelog, and Atlassian has announced that the standalone product will reach end of life as the CLI moves to the Rovo CLI.
Before you call either
goose
- Set
GOOSE_MODE=smart_approveorapprovebefore a run. The default approves everything, and the first-run prompt preselects Auto - Pass
--max-turnswith a real limit. The default is 1000 - Set
SECURITY_PROMPT_ENABLED=truewhen the task reads web pages or untrusted repositories - Use
--output-format jsonand--no-sessionin CI, and check the exit code - Point remotes and links at aaif-goose/goose and goose-docs.ai. The block/goose paths redirect
Rovo Dev CLI
- Pass the instruction as an argument to
acli rovodev runfor a single non-interactive run. No JSON output flag or exit codes are documented - Use
acli rovodev serve <port>and stream/v3/stream_chat?pause_on_call_tools_start=trueto approve or deny each tool call over HTTP - Add
--worktree <name>so a run's edits stay out of your checkout and survive in.rovodev/worktrees/<name> - Set
"enable_instructions": falseon MCP servers you don't trust, since server instructions go into the system prompt by default - Check
/usagebefore long runs. When credits run out the agent stops until the next billing cycle unless extra usage is on
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, goose or Rovo Dev CLI?
goose scores 73.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Rovo Dev CLI's 43.9 (E), and leads in every scored category.
Are goose and Rovo Dev CLI open source?
goose is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Rovo Dev CLI.
Other comparisons with goose or Rovo Dev CLI
- Agent Zero vs goose
- Agent Zero vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Aider vs goose
- Aider vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Amp vs goose
- Amp vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs goose
- Antigravity CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Auggie CLI vs goose
- Auggie CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Claude Code vs goose
- Claude Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Cline vs goose
- Cline vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Crush vs goose
- Crush vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Cursor CLI vs goose
- Cursor CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs goose
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Devin vs goose
- Devin vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Droid CLI vs goose
- Droid CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Pi vs goose
- Pi vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Gemini CLI vs goose
- Gemini CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs goose
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- goose vs Harness²
- goose vs HarnessRouter
- goose vs Jules
- goose vs Junie CLI
- goose vs Kilo Code CLI
- goose vs Kimi Code CLI
- goose vs Kiro CLI
- goose vs mini-swe-agent
- goose vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- goose vs Muse Code
- goose vs OpenAI Codex
- goose vs OpenCode
- goose vs OpenHands
- goose vs Prime Agent
- goose vs Qoder CLI
- goose vs Qwen Code
- goose vs Mirror CLI
- goose vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Harness² vs Rovo Dev CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Jules vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Junie CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kilo Code CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kiro CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Muse Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenAI Codex vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenCode vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenHands vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Prime Agent vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qoder CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qwen Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Mirror CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Rovo Dev CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs goose
- CLI Manager vs Rovo Dev CLI
- goose vs Harness
- goose vs Paperclip
- goose vs Parallax
- Harness vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Paperclip vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Parallax vs Rovo Dev CLI
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/goose-vs-rovo-dev-cli.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/goose.json·/api/v1/tools/rovo-dev-cli.json - From a terminal
anchor compare goose rovo-dev-cli(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "goose", "b": "rovo-dev-cli"}at/mcp, no key