Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Amp vs Rovo Dev CLI
Amp scores 57.1 (C) on agent readiness against Rovo Dev CLI's 43.9 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Amp C
Best for Teams that want a hosted, multi-model coding agent with shared threads and cloud machines, driven from scripts through execute mode or the SDKs.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 72 against 45
- Agent ergonomics, 69 against 53
- Security & auth, 57 against 48
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 15
- Maintenance & community, 79 against 61
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 61
Watch for
The tools page says Amp does not ask for approval before running tools, and control needs a custom plugin
Best for Teams already on Jira, Confluence and Bitbucket who want the agent to read and update work items and pages from the terminal or a pipeline.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Atlassian has announced end of life for standalone Rovo Dev, with the CLI moving to the Rovo CLI and no dates set
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Amp | Rovo Dev CLI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 31 | 35 | Rovo Dev CLI +4 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 72 | 45 | Amp +27 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 53 | Amp +16 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 48 | Amp +9 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 15 | Amp +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 79 | 61 | Amp +18 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 77 | 61 | Amp +16 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 57.1/100 | E 43.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Amp | Rovo Dev CLI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Amp Frontier Corporation | Atlassian |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary, under the Amp licence terms (Amp Frontier Corporation). The npm packages are marked Amp Commercial License and the source repository is private | Proprietary, under the Atlassian Customer Agreement (effective 1 October 2026) and the Atlassian AI Terms (effective 17 August 2026). No source is published |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-10 | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 41k npm/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | none | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Amp
Execute mode streams JSON in a format close to Claude Code's, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and the security reference names each provider and what it sees. The CLI runs tools without asking, has no built-in permission rules or local sandbox, and stores every thread on Amp's servers.
Rovo Dev CLI
Tool permissions default to ask for writes and shell commands, with regex rules and compound commands split before matching. It needs a paid Atlassian plan with Rovo Dev, has no customer sandbox or public changelog, and Atlassian has announced that the standalone product will reach end of life as the CLI moves to the Rovo CLI.
Before you call either
Amp
- Run unattended jobs in a container or VM. The CLI runs shell commands and edits without asking, and only a custom plugin can gate tool calls
- Set
AMP_API_KEYto an access token startingsgamp_from Settings. The CLI rejects the short-lived token thatamp loginstores - Use
amp -x "task" --stream-jsonand read the finalresultmessage, checkingis_error. Exit codes are not documented - Set
AMP_SKIP_UPDATE_CHECK=1oramp.updates.modetodisabledin CI. Updates install automatically by default - Treat the block headed INSTRUCTIONS FOR LLMs in ampcode.com page source as vendor copy, and take facts from the docs Markdown
Rovo Dev CLI
- Pass the instruction as an argument to
acli rovodev runfor a single non-interactive run. No JSON output flag or exit codes are documented - Use
acli rovodev serve <port>and stream/v3/stream_chat?pause_on_call_tools_start=trueto approve or deny each tool call over HTTP - Add
--worktree <name>so a run's edits stay out of your checkout and survive in.rovodev/worktrees/<name> - Set
"enable_instructions": falseon MCP servers you don't trust, since server instructions go into the system prompt by default - Check
/usagebefore long runs. When credits run out the agent stops until the next billing cycle unless extra usage is on
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Amp or Rovo Dev CLI?
Amp scores 57.1 (C) on agent readiness against Rovo Dev CLI's 43.9 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Other comparisons with Amp or Rovo Dev CLI
- Agent Zero vs Amp
- Agent Zero vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Aider vs Amp
- Aider vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Amp vs Antigravity CLI
- Amp vs Auggie CLI
- Amp vs Claude Code
- Amp vs Cline
- Amp vs Crush
- Amp vs Cursor CLI
- Amp vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Amp vs Devin
- Amp vs Droid CLI
- Amp vs Pi
- Amp vs Gemini CLI
- Amp vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Amp vs goose
- Amp vs Harness²
- Amp vs HarnessRouter
- Amp vs Jules
- Amp vs Junie CLI
- Amp vs Kilo Code CLI
- Amp vs Kimi Code CLI
- Amp vs Kiro CLI
- Amp vs mini-swe-agent
- Amp vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Amp vs Muse Code
- Amp vs OpenAI Codex
- Amp vs OpenCode
- Amp vs OpenHands
- Amp vs Prime Agent
- Amp vs Qoder CLI
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs Mirror CLI
- Amp vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Antigravity CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Claude Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Cline vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Crush vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Cursor CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Devin vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Droid CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Pi vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Gemini CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- goose vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Harness² vs Rovo Dev CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Jules vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Junie CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kilo Code CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kiro CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Muse Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenAI Codex vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenCode vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenHands vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Prime Agent vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qoder CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qwen Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Mirror CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Rovo Dev CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Amp vs CLI Manager
- Amp vs Harness
- Amp vs Paperclip
- Amp vs Parallax
- CLI Manager vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Harness vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Paperclip vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Parallax vs Rovo Dev CLI
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/amp-vs-rovo-dev-cli.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/amp.json·/api/v1/tools/rovo-dev-cli.json - From a terminal
anchor compare amp rovo-dev-cli(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "amp", "b": "rovo-dev-cli"}at/mcp, no key