Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Amp vs Qoder CLI
Qoder CLI scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Amp's 57.1 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Amp leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Amp C
Best for Teams that want a hosted, multi-model coding agent with shared threads and cloud machines, driven from scripts through execute mode or the SDKs.
Ahead on
- Maintenance & community, 79 against 72
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 64
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Qoder CLI loses 3 points for them
Watch for
The tools page says Amp does not ask for approval before running tools, and control needs a custom plugin
Best for Developers already on Qoder who want the same agent in a terminal, in CI through a PAT, in Zed through ACP, or embedded through the Agent SDK.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 51 against 31
- Schema & documentation, 81 against 72
- Agent ergonomics, 80 against 69
Watch for
No local sandbox is documented, and auto mode approves read-only tools on any path
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Amp | Qoder CLI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 31 | 51 | Qoder CLI +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 72 | 81 | Qoder CLI +9 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 80 | Qoder CLI +11 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 55 | Amp +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 35 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 79 | 72 | Amp +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 77 | 64 | Amp +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | C 57.1/100 | C 59.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Amp | Qoder CLI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Amp Frontier Corporation | Qoder (BRIGHT ZENITH PRIVATE LIMITED) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary, under the Amp licence terms (Amp Frontier Corporation). The npm packages are marked Amp Commercial License and the source repository is private | Proprietary, under the Qoder Terms of Service (BRIGHT ZENITH PRIVATE LIMITED, last updated 29 April 2026). No source is published, and the Agent SDK's LICENSE file points to the same terms |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-10 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 41k npm/wk | 5k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Amp
Execute mode streams JSON in a format close to Claude Code's, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and the security reference names each provider and what it sees. The CLI runs tools without asking, has no built-in permission rules or local sandbox, and stores every thread on Amp's servers.
Qoder CLI
A closed-source terminal agent with a documented headless mode, an ACP server, typed TypeScript and Python SDKs and near-daily releases. Permission rules and modes are detailed, but no local sandbox is documented, usage statistics are on by default, and security fixes appear only as one-line release notes with no advisories or disclosure policy.
Before you call either
Amp
- Run unattended jobs in a container or VM. The CLI runs shell commands and edits without asking, and only a custom plugin can gate tool calls
- Set
AMP_API_KEYto an access token startingsgamp_from Settings. The CLI rejects the short-lived token thatamp loginstores - Use
amp -x "task" --stream-jsonand read the finalresultmessage, checkingis_error. Exit codes are not documented - Set
AMP_SKIP_UPDATE_CHECK=1oramp.updates.modetodisabledin CI. Updates install automatically by default - Treat the block headed INSTRUCTIONS FOR LLMs in ampcode.com page source as vendor copy, and take facts from the docs Markdown
Qoder CLI
- Set
QODER_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKENin CI. The browser sign-in can't complete in a headless run - Pass
--permission-modewith--allowed-toolsin headless runs. Every ask is denied, and--yoloremoves all checks - Set
--max-turnson unattended runs, and branch on exit codes 41 (authentication) and 53 (turn limit) - Set
privacy.usageStatisticsEnabledandaiCodeStatistics.enabledto false in ~/.qoder/settings.json if usage data must stay local - Don't pass
--model lite. The Lite tier was removed on 18 September 2026 and headless requests naming it fail
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Amp or Qoder CLI?
Qoder CLI scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Amp's 57.1 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Amp leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Other comparisons with Amp or Qoder CLI
- Agent Zero vs Amp
- Agent Zero vs Qoder CLI
- Aider vs Amp
- Aider vs Qoder CLI
- Amp vs Antigravity CLI
- Amp vs Auggie CLI
- Amp vs Claude Code
- Amp vs Cline
- Amp vs Crush
- Amp vs Cursor CLI
- Amp vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Amp vs Devin
- Amp vs Droid CLI
- Amp vs Pi
- Amp vs Gemini CLI
- Amp vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Amp vs goose
- Amp vs Harness²
- Amp vs HarnessRouter
- Amp vs Jules
- Amp vs Junie CLI
- Amp vs Kilo Code CLI
- Amp vs Kimi Code CLI
- Amp vs Kiro CLI
- Amp vs mini-swe-agent
- Amp vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Amp vs Muse Code
- Amp vs OpenAI Codex
- Amp vs OpenCode
- Amp vs OpenHands
- Amp vs Prime Agent
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs Mirror CLI
- Amp vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Amp vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Antigravity CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Claude Code vs Qoder CLI
- Cline vs Qoder CLI
- Crush vs Qoder CLI
- Cursor CLI vs Qoder CLI
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Qoder CLI
- Devin vs Qoder CLI
- Droid CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Pi vs Qoder CLI
- Gemini CLI vs Qoder CLI
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Qoder CLI
- goose vs Qoder CLI
- Harness² vs Qoder CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Qoder CLI
- Jules vs Qoder CLI
- Junie CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Kilo Code CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Kiro CLI vs Qoder CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Qoder CLI
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Muse Code vs Qoder CLI
- OpenAI Codex vs Qoder CLI
- OpenCode vs Qoder CLI
- OpenHands vs Qoder CLI
- Prime Agent vs Qoder CLI
- Qoder CLI vs Qwen Code
- Qoder CLI vs Mirror CLI
- Qoder CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qoder CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Amp vs CLI Manager
- Amp vs Harness
- Amp vs Paperclip
- Amp vs Parallax
- CLI Manager vs Qoder CLI
- Harness vs Qoder CLI
- Paperclip vs Qoder CLI
- Parallax vs Qoder CLI
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/amp-vs-qoder-cli.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/amp.json·/api/v1/tools/qoder-cli.json - From a terminal
anchor compare amp qoder-cli(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "amp", "b": "qoder-cli"}at/mcp, no key