Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Harness² vs Qoder CLI
Qoder CLI scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Harness²'s 41.6 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Harness² leads on payments & pricing. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Harness² E
Best for Researchers who want to reproduce or extend the paper's per-task harness refinement on JobBench, LAB or WorkBuddy-Bench with OpenCode or Codex on Vertex AI.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
- No incidents deducted, where Qoder CLI loses 3 points for them
Watch for
No hosted API, MCP server or tagged release. It installs from a source checkout only, and harness2 isn't on PyPI
Best for Developers already on Qoder who want the same agent in a terminal, in CI through a PAT, in Zed through ACP, or embedded through the Agent SDK.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 51 against 20
- Schema & documentation, 81 against 51
- Agent ergonomics, 80 against 59
- Security & auth, 55 against 44
- Maintenance & community, 72 against 36
- Transparency & trust, 64 against 44
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
No local sandbox is documented, and auto mode approves read-only tools on any path
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Harness² | Qoder CLI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 20 | 51 | Qoder CLI +31 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 51 | 81 | Qoder CLI +30 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 59 | 80 | Qoder CLI +21 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 44 | 55 | Qoder CLI +11 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 35 | Harness² +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 36 | 72 | Qoder CLI +36 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 44 | 64 | Qoder CLI +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | E 41.6/100 | C 59.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Harness² | Qoder CLI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Google (Google Research) | Qoder (BRIGHT ZENITH PRIVATE LIMITED) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0. Bundled benchmark runners keep their upstream licences (Apache-2.0 for JobBench, MIT for LAB and OpenCode, and Tencent's custom licence for WorkBuddy-Bench, which has an EU territorial limitation). | Proprietary, under the Qoder Terms of Service (BRIGHT ZENITH PRIVATE LIMITED, last updated 29 April 2026). No source is published, and the Agent SDK's LICENSE file points to the same terms |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 4.2k stars | 5k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 3.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Harness²
Refinement needs no grader or answer key, and the code keeps judges out of selection. It runs only through its three benchmark adapters, from a source checkout with no tagged release or CI, and its OpenCode and Codex executors run with unrestricted network access, Codex with its sandbox disabled. The benchmark gains are the authors' claims.
Qoder CLI
A closed-source terminal agent with a documented headless mode, an ACP server, typed TypeScript and Python SDKs and near-daily releases. Permission rules and modes are detailed, but no local sandbox is documented, usage statistics are on by default, and security fixes appear only as one-line release notes with no advisories or disclosure policy.
Before you call either
Harness²
- Don't plan to call Harness² as a service. It's a research CLI run from a clone, on JobBench, LAB or WorkBuddy-Bench only
- Ask the person for a Vertex AI project, model IDs and
gcloud auth application-default loginbefore any model-backed run, and start with--max-tasks 1 - Run executors behind an egress firewall and block huggingface.co and github.com after setup, as the docs advise, so rubrics can't be fetched
- Write .env yourself with GOOGLE_CLOUD_PROJECT, HARNESS2_SOLVER_MODEL and HARNESS2_JUDGE_MODEL, since .env.example isn't shipped, and never commit it
- Use the same benchmark, executor,
--k,--modeand seed forharness2,harness2-judgeandharness2-report, or the results won't line up
Qoder CLI
- Set
QODER_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKENin CI. The browser sign-in can't complete in a headless run - Pass
--permission-modewith--allowed-toolsin headless runs. Every ask is denied, and--yoloremoves all checks - Set
--max-turnson unattended runs, and branch on exit codes 41 (authentication) and 53 (turn limit) - Set
privacy.usageStatisticsEnabledandaiCodeStatistics.enabledto false in ~/.qoder/settings.json if usage data must stay local - Don't pass
--model lite. The Lite tier was removed on 18 September 2026 and headless requests naming it fail
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Harness² or Qoder CLI?
Qoder CLI scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Harness²'s 41.6 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Harness² leads on payments & pricing.
Are Harness² and Qoder CLI open source?
Harness² is open source (Apache-2.0. Bundled benchmark runners keep their upstream licences (Apache-2.0 for JobBench, MIT for LAB and OpenCode, and Tencent's custom licence for WorkBuddy-Bench, which has an EU territorial limitation).). No open-source release is listed for Qoder CLI.
Other comparisons with Harness² or Qoder CLI
- Agent Zero vs Harness²
- Agent Zero vs Qoder CLI
- Aider vs Harness²
- Aider vs Qoder CLI
- Amp vs Harness²
- Amp vs Qoder CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Harness²
- Antigravity CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Harness²
- Auggie CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Claude Code vs Harness²
- Claude Code vs Qoder CLI
- Cline vs Harness²
- Cline vs Qoder CLI
- Crush vs Harness²
- Crush vs Qoder CLI
- Cursor CLI vs Harness²
- Cursor CLI vs Qoder CLI
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Harness²
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Qoder CLI
- Devin vs Harness²
- Devin vs Qoder CLI
- Droid CLI vs Harness²
- Droid CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Pi vs Harness²
- Pi vs Qoder CLI
- Gemini CLI vs Harness²
- Gemini CLI vs Qoder CLI
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Harness²
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Qoder CLI
- goose vs Harness²
- goose vs Qoder CLI
- Harness² vs HarnessRouter
- Harness² vs Jules
- Harness² vs Junie CLI
- Harness² vs Kilo Code CLI
- Harness² vs Kimi Code CLI
- Harness² vs Kiro CLI
- Harness² vs mini-swe-agent
- Harness² vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Harness² vs Muse Code
- Harness² vs OpenAI Codex
- Harness² vs OpenCode
- Harness² vs OpenHands
- Harness² vs Prime Agent
- Harness² vs Qwen Code
- Harness² vs Mirror CLI
- Harness² vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Harness² vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- HarnessRouter vs Qoder CLI
- Jules vs Qoder CLI
- Junie CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Kilo Code CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Kiro CLI vs Qoder CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Qoder CLI
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Muse Code vs Qoder CLI
- OpenAI Codex vs Qoder CLI
- OpenCode vs Qoder CLI
- OpenHands vs Qoder CLI
- Prime Agent vs Qoder CLI
- Qoder CLI vs Qwen Code
- Qoder CLI vs Mirror CLI
- Qoder CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qoder CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs Qoder CLI
- Harness vs Qoder CLI
- Paperclip vs Qoder CLI
- Parallax vs Qoder CLI
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/harness2-vs-qoder-cli.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/harness2.json·/api/v1/tools/qoder-cli.json - From a terminal
anchor compare harness2 qoder-cli(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "harness2", "b": "qoder-cli"}at/mcp, no key