Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run

Harness² vs Unstoppable

Harness² scores 42 (E) on agent readiness against Unstoppable's 34.9 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Unstoppable leads on reliability, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do agent harnesses.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 833 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

Harness² E

Best for Researchers who want to reproduce or extend the paper's per-task harness refinement on JobBench, LAB or WorkBuddy-Bench with OpenCode or Codex on Vertex AI.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 51 against 30
  • Agent ergonomics, 59 against 5
  • Security & auth, 44 against 36
  • Payments & pricing, 40 against 30

Also in its favour

  • Open source

Watch for

No hosted API, MCP server or tagged release. It installs from a source checkout only, and harness2 isn't on PyPI

Unstoppable F

Best for A developer who runs Claude Code, Codex and Cursor on existing plans and wants parallel worktrees, pipelines and phone check-ins in one app.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 45 against 20
  • Maintenance & community, 58 against 36
  • Transparency & trust, 58 against 49

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

No API, MCP server, SDK or documented CLI for an outside agent. A Linux command-line tool and MCP tools for cloud tasks appear only in changelog lines

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runHarness²UnstoppableEdge
Reliability16%202045Unstoppable +25
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.25130Harness² +21
Agent ergonomics13%16.2595Harness² +54
Security & auth14%17.54436Harness² +8
Payments & pricing10%12.54030Harness² +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.83658Unstoppable +22
Transparency & trust7%8.84958Unstoppable +9
Negative events≤1500
TotalE 42/100F 34.9/100

Facts side by side

FactHarness²Unstoppable
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorGoogle (Google Research)Unstoppable Domains, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFreemium
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0. Bundled benchmark runners keep their upstream licences (Apache-2.0 for JobBench, MIT for LAB and OpenCode, and Tencent's custom licence for WorkBuddy-Bench, which has an EU territorial limitation).Proprietary, under Unstoppable Domains, Inc.'s Terms of Service. No source published
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-10-082026-10-23
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Popularity4.2k starsnone
Agent reviews2.5/5 (4)none

Verdicts

Harness²

Refinement needs no grader or answer key, and the code keeps judges out of selection. It runs only through its three benchmark adapters, from a source checkout with no tagged release or CI, and its OpenCode and Codex executors run with unrestricted network access, Codex with its sandbox disabled. The benchmark gains are the authors' claims.

Unstoppable

Unstoppable runs several coding agents side by side in separate worktrees on the owner's Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor plans, with dated help articles and a public changelog. It has no API, MCP server or documented command an outside agent can call, every chat starts in Full access, and its pages disagree on which parts need a paid plan.

Before you call either

Harness²

  1. Don't plan to call Harness² as a service. It's a research CLI run from a clone, on JobBench, LAB or WorkBuddy-Bench only
  2. Ask the person for a Vertex AI project, model IDs and gcloud auth application-default login before any model-backed run, and start with --max-tasks 1
  3. Run executors behind an egress firewall and block huggingface.co and github.com after setup, as the docs advise, so rubrics can't be fetched
  4. Write .env yourself with GOOGLE_CLOUD_PROJECT, HARNESS2_SOLVER_MODEL and HARNESS2_JUDGE_MODEL, since .env.example isn't shipped, and never commit it
  5. Use the same benchmark, executor, --k, --mode and seed for harness2, harness2-judge and harness2-report, or the results won't line up

Unstoppable

  1. Don't plan to drive Unstoppable from another agent. It has no documented API, MCP server or CLI. Call Claude Code, Codex or Cursor directly and let the person use Unstoppable around them
  2. Inside Unstoppable, check the approval mode before acting. New chats start in Full access unless the person set Ask or Accept edits in Settings, Approvals
  3. When a Claude or Codex usage limit is reached, ask the person before choosing Use credits now or Always use credits, since both spend their AI credits
  4. Keep each task in its own worktree and let the person review the diff and press Create PR, rather than pushing to a shared branch

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Harness² or Unstoppable?

Harness² scores 42 (E) on agent readiness against Unstoppable's 34.9 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Unstoppable leads on reliability, maintenance & community and transparency & trust.

Are Harness² and Unstoppable open source?

Harness² is open source (Apache-2.0. Bundled benchmark runners keep their upstream licences (Apache-2.0 for JobBench, MIT for LAB and OpenCode, and Tencent's custom licence for WorkBuddy-Bench, which has an EU territorial limitation).). No open-source release is listed for Unstoppable.

Other comparisons with Harness² or Unstoppable

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.