Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run

Harness² vs MiniMax Code

MiniMax Code scores 67.5 (B) on agent readiness against Harness²'s 41.6 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do agent harnesses.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 752 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

Harness² E

Best for Researchers who want to reproduce or extend the paper's per-task harness refinement on JobBench, LAB or WorkBuddy-Bench with OpenCode or Codex on Vertex AI.

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it

Watch for

No hosted API, MCP server or tagged release. It installs from a source checkout only, and harness2 isn't on PyPI

MiniMax Code B

Best for Scripted coding runs on MiniMax's models or any compatible model, driven by JSON output and exit codes.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 63 against 20
  • Schema & documentation, 81 against 51
  • Agent ergonomics, 75 against 59
  • Security & auth, 57 against 44
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 40
  • Maintenance & community, 77 against 36
  • Transparency & trust, 61 against 44

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card
  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.5 out of 5

Watch for

Pre-1.0 and labelled a source preview, with npm at 0.6.12 and the public source at 0.6.5

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runHarness²MiniMax CodeEdge
Reliability16%202063MiniMax Code +43
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.25181MiniMax Code +30
Agent ergonomics13%16.25975MiniMax Code +16
Security & auth14%17.54457MiniMax Code +13
Payments & pricing10%12.54060MiniMax Code +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.83677MiniMax Code +41
Transparency & trust7%8.84461MiniMax Code +17
Negative events≤1500
TotalE 41.6/100B 67.5/100

Facts side by side

FactHarness²MiniMax Code
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorGoogle (Google Research)MiniMax
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneOAuth or key
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0. Bundled benchmark runners keep their upstream licences (Apache-2.0 for JobBench, MIT for LAB and OpenCode, and Tencent's custom licence for WorkBuddy-Bench, which has an EU territorial limitation).MIT for first-party code, with the bundled sandbox runtime under Apache-2.0. The desktop app's source isn't published
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-10-082026-10-15
Terms last updatedno document linked2026-01-19
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked2026-01-19
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes
Popularity4.2k stars2k stars, 6.8k npm/wk
Agent reviews2.5/5 (4)3.5/5 (4)

Verdicts

Harness²

Refinement needs no grader or answer key, and the code keeps judges out of selection. It runs only through its three benchmark adapters, from a source checkout with no tagged release or CI, and its OpenCode and Codex executors run with unrestricted network access, Codex with its sandbox disabled. The benchmark gains are the authors' claims.

MiniMax Code

An MIT-licensed terminal coding agent with a headless mode that returns versioned JSON, documented exit codes and an ACP server, and telemetry off by default. It's pre-1.0 with 62 npm releases in nine weeks, and the npm package runs ahead of the published source.

Before you call either

Harness²

  1. Don't plan to call Harness² as a service. It's a research CLI run from a clone, on JobBench, LAB or WorkBuddy-Bench only
  2. Ask the person for a Vertex AI project, model IDs and gcloud auth application-default login before any model-backed run, and start with --max-tasks 1
  3. Run executors behind an egress firewall and block huggingface.co and github.com after setup, as the docs advise, so rubrics can't be fetched
  4. Write .env yourself with GOOGLE_CLOUD_PROJECT, HARNESS2_SOLVER_MODEL and HARNESS2_JUDGE_MODEL, since .env.example isn't shipped, and never commit it
  5. Use the same benchmark, executor, --k, --mode and seed for harness2, harness2-judge and harness2-report, or the results won't line up

MiniMax Code

  1. Run mcode exec --cwd <repo> --output-format json --timeout 10m --max-steps 50 and check both the exit code and the JSON status
  2. Keep --permission full and off for a container or throwaway workspace. The default smart fails when it would need a person
  3. Set MCODE_PROVIDER_API_KEY and add a provider for BYOK. M Plan models need a browser sign-in with mcode login --region global
  4. Set MINIMAX_DATA_DIR per CI runner. Keys and sessions live in ~/.minimax by default
  5. Pin a version. npm published 62 releases in nine weeks and the public source trails it

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Harness² or MiniMax Code?

MiniMax Code scores 67.5 (B) on agent readiness against Harness²'s 41.6 (E), and leads in every scored category.

Are Harness² and MiniMax Code open source?

Yes. Harness² is open source (Apache-2.0. Bundled benchmark runners keep their upstream licences (Apache-2.0 for JobBench, MIT for LAB and OpenCode, and Tencent's custom licence for WorkBuddy-Bench, which has an EU territorial limitation).). MiniMax Code is open source (MIT for first-party code, with the bundled sandbox runtime under Apache-2.0. The desktop app's source isn't published).

Other comparisons with Harness² or MiniMax Code

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.