Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Agent Zero vs goose
goose scores 73.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Agent Zero's 54.2 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 205 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A technical owner who wants an agent with its own Linux machine, reachable from Telegram, WhatsApp or email, with scheduled tasks and editable memory.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No approval step before shell commands, file changes or outgoing messages. Tool Access defaults to allow
goose BB
Best for People and pipelines that want one agent across many model providers or local models, with recipes for repeatable jobs and a desktop app for non-engineers.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 77 against 57
- Schema & documentation, 81 against 64
- Agent ergonomics, 82 against 62
- Security & auth, 77 against 54
- Maintenance & community, 86 against 75
- Transparency & trust, 63 against 55
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
Autonomous mode, which approves every tool call, is the default
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Agent Zero | goose | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 57 | 77 | goose +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 64 | 81 | goose +17 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 62 | 82 | goose +20 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 54 | 77 | goose +23 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 75 | 86 | goose +11 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 55 | 63 | goose +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -6 | -2 | |
| Total | C 54.2/100 | BB 73.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Agent Zero | goose |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Agent Zero, s.r.o. | Agentic AI Foundation (originally Block) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 19k stars | 55k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Agent Zero
Self-hosted under the MIT licence, with nine releases in the 90 days to 12 October 2026 and breaking changes listed in the release notes. The agent runs shell commands in its container with no approval step, the web interface has no login by default, and five CVEs from the past year have no published GitHub advisory.
goose
Telemetry off until the user opts in, with the collected fields listed. Autonomous mode, which approves every tool call, is the default.
Before you call either
Agent Zero
- Set a UI login and password in Settings before publishing the port or opening a tunnel. The default has none
- Fill
allowed_users,allowed_numbersorsender_whitelistbefore enabling a channel. An empty list accepts every sender - Enable the Infection Check plugin when the agent reads mail, web pages or MCP results. It ships disabled
- Run v2.12 or later. It fixes a Telegram webhook authentication bypass and a WhatsApp media path traversal
- Call
POST /api_messagewith theX-API-KEYheader. The token changes when the UI login or password changes
goose
- Set
GOOSE_MODE=smart_approveorapprovebefore a run. The default approves everything - Pass
--max-turnswith a real limit. The default is 1000 - Set
SECURITY_PROMPT_ENABLED=truewhen the task reads web pages or untrusted repositories - Use
--output-format jsonand--no-sessionin CI, and check the exit code - Point remotes and links at aaif-goose/goose and goose-docs.ai. The block/goose paths redirect
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Agent Zero or goose?
goose scores 73.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Agent Zero's 54.2 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Are Agent Zero and goose open source?
Yes. Agent Zero is open source (MIT). goose is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Agent Zero or goose
- Agent Zero vs Aider
- Agent Zero vs Amp
- Agent Zero vs Antigravity CLI
- Agent Zero vs Claude Code
- Agent Zero vs Cline
- Agent Zero vs Cursor CLI
- Agent Zero vs Devin
- Agent Zero vs Droid CLI
- Agent Zero vs Pi
- Agent Zero vs Gemini CLI
- Agent Zero vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Agent Zero vs Kilo Code CLI
- Agent Zero vs Kiro CLI
- Agent Zero vs OpenAI Codex
- Agent Zero vs OpenCode
- Agent Zero vs OpenHands
- Agent Zero vs Prime Agent
- Agent Zero vs Qwen Code
- Aider vs goose
- Amp vs goose
- Antigravity CLI vs goose
- Claude Code vs goose
- Cline vs goose
- Cursor CLI vs goose
- Devin vs goose
- Droid CLI vs goose
- Pi vs goose
- Gemini CLI vs goose
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs goose
- goose vs Kilo Code CLI
- goose vs Kiro CLI
- goose vs OpenAI Codex
- goose vs OpenCode
- goose vs OpenHands
- goose vs Prime Agent
- goose vs Qwen Code
- goose vs Paperclip
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/agent-zero-vs-goose.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/agent-zero.json·/api/v1/tools/goose.json - From a terminal
anchor compare agent-zero goose(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "agent-zero", "b": "goose"}at/mcp, no key