Head to head · Agent harness · October 2026 research run
Pi vs goose
goose scores 73.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Pi's 68.4 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent harness.
Which one, for what
Pi B
Good for Developers and pipelines that want a small, scriptable coding agent they can extend in TypeScript and drive over JSONL or RPC, inside their own container.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No permission system or sandbox. Tool calls run with the user's rights and without an approval prompt
goose BB
Good for People and pipelines that want one agent across many model providers or local models, with recipes for repeatable jobs and a desktop app for non-engineers.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 82 against 76
- Security & auth, 77 against 61
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
Watch for
Autonomous mode, which approves every tool call, is the default
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Pi | goose | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 75 | 77 | goose +2 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 81 | Pi +3 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 82 | goose +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 61 | 77 | goose +16 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 87 | 86 | Pi +1 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 64 | 63 | Pi +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -4 | -2 | |
| Total | 68.4 · B | 73.9 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Pi | goose |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Earendil | Agentic AI Foundation (originally Block) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-07 | 2026-09-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 113k stars, 5.2M npm/wk | 55k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Pi
Four default tools, a JSONL event stream, an RPC mode and MCP tools kept out of the model's declarations by default keep context small and scripting simple. Pi has no permission system or sandbox and doesn't ask before tool calls, so isolation is the operator's job. Version 1.0.0 is dated 1 October 2026.
goose
Telemetry off until the user opts in, with the collected fields listed. Autonomous mode, which approves every tool call, is the default.
Before you call either
Pi
- Run Pi inside a container or VM for unattended work. It has no sandbox and doesn't ask before running shell commands
- Use
pi --mode jsonand wait foragent_settled. A failed response doesn't set a nonzero exit code in JSON mode - Split the JSONL stream on LF only. Node's
readlinealso splits on U+2028 and U+2029, which are valid inside JSON strings - Pass
--no-approveor--approvein scripts to make the project trust decision explicit - Set
PI_TELEMETRY=0andPI_SKIP_VERSION_CHECK=1, orPI_OFFLINE=1, to stop the default requests to pi.dev
goose
- Set
GOOSE_MODE=smart_approveorapprovebefore a run. The default approves everything - Pass
--max-turnswith a real limit. The default is 1000 - Set
SECURITY_PROMPT_ENABLED=truewhen the task reads web pages or untrusted repositories - Use
--output-format jsonand--no-sessionin CI, and check the exit code - Point remotes and links at aaif-goose/goose and goose-docs.ai. The block/goose paths redirect
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Pi or goose?
goose scores 73.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Pi's 68.4 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories.
Are Pi and goose open source?
Yes. Pi is open source (MIT). goose is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Pi or goose
- Aider vs Pi
- Aider vs goose
- Claude Code vs Pi
- Claude Code vs goose
- Cline vs Pi
- Cline vs goose
- Cursor CLI vs Pi
- Cursor CLI vs goose
- Pi vs Gemini CLI
- Pi vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Pi vs OpenAI Codex
- Pi vs OpenCode
- Pi vs OpenHands
- Pi vs Prime Agent
- Gemini CLI vs goose
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs goose
- goose vs OpenAI Codex
- goose vs OpenCode
- goose vs OpenHands
- goose vs Prime Agent
- goose vs Paperclip
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/earendil-pi-vs-goose.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/earendil-pi.json·/api/v1/tools/goose.json - From a terminal
anchor compare earendil-pi goose(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "earendil-pi", "b": "goose"}at/mcp, no key