Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Pi vs Orca
Pi scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against Orca's 57.4 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 1500 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Pi B
Best for Developers and pipelines that want a small, scriptable coding agent they can extend in TypeScript and drive over JSONL or RPC, inside their own container.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 75 against 58
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 65
- Agent ergonomics, 76 against 70
- Security & auth, 61 against 43
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 40
- Maintenance & community, 87 against 75
- Transparency & trust, 67 against 54
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
No permission system or sandbox. Tool calls run with the user's rights and without an approval prompt
Orca C
Best for Developers who want an orchestrator agent to split work across parallel coding agents, on desktop or mobile.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Pi loses 10 points for them
Watch for
Anonymous usage data collected by default, with an opt-out
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Payments & pricing Pi +20
Pi 60
No payment protocol in the repository or docs (0). Read with the self-hosted rule. Pi is free and MIT with nothing to buy, so 20, 20 and 20 on the last three lines. Model costs go to whichever provider the owner configures. Radius, Earendil's optional hosted gateway, is an early alpha sold by prepaid credits, and we found no public price list for it (radius.earendil.com/pricing returns 404 on 23 October 2026).
Orca 40
Scored on the cloud option. No protocol (0). The cloud price wasn't found on the pages read (0). The desktop app is free and MIT with no card (20). The local app needs no sign-up that we found (20). 0 + 0 + 20 + 20 = 40.
Schema & documentation Pi +19
Pi 84
Harness reading, as for the other harnesses. JSON Schemas for settings, models, keybindings and themes ship in the package and, since 1.2.0 on 12 October 2026, at pi.dev/schemas/, and the JSON event stream and every RPC command are documented record by record, but as Markdown and TypeScript types with no machine-readable spec for the RPC protocol (18). pi.dev/llms.txt returns 404. Each docs page answers Accept: text/markdown with Markdown, and the docs ship inside the npm package (8). The integration page has a table saying when to use interactive, print, JSON, RPC or the SDK, and the MCP page gives a typical use for each exposure setting. 1.4.0 adds a Models Configuration reference generated from the models.json schema (17). Enumerated modes, thinking levels and exposure values, typed settings with defaults (13). A Python RPC client, a typed TypeScript client and about 75 example extensions, with command errors and parse errors shown as records (13). A dated changelog in the repository and at pi.dev/changelog with an RSS feed (15).
Orca 65
Harness reading. A docs site with CLI orchestration and native chat pages (65).
Security & auth Pi +18
Pi 61
Harness reading of the framework checklist, used for the harnesses in this category. 30 for what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. An anonymous install and update ping to pi.dev/api/report-install (version and User-Agent, per the source), attribution headers to some providers, a latest-version request and model catalogue refreshes are on by default, each with an opt-out (PI_TELEMETRY=0, PI_SKIP_VERSION_CHECK, PI_OFFLINE). Since 1.4.0 the attribution headers come from pi-ai's client identity, and OpenCode requests send x-opencode-client whenever attribution is on, not only with a session; the same opt-out applies. Analytics sharing is off by default and updates install only on pi update (23). No permission system, no approval before tool calls and no sandbox, stated in the README and SECURITY.md. Project trust gates a repository's .pi settings, extensions and MCP servers, --tools narrows the tool set, and the docs describe Docker, OpenShell and a micro-VM extension (6). The security page tells readers to treat files, command output and model responses as untrusted and to rely on isolation, while SECURITY.md puts prompt injection out of scope and context files such as AGENTS.md load whatever the trust decision (7). Sessions are JSONL files on disk with HTML export, MCP server logs go to ~/.pi/agent/mcp.log, and the JSON stream records each tool call (11). SECURITY.md gives security@earendil.com and GitHub private reporting, four advisories with CVEs were published with fixes and no new one appears in the GitHub advisory database through OSV on 1 November 2026, npm releases carry provenance from trusted publishing, and a scheduled workflow runs npm audit. Security fixes made since 23 October (OAuth URL schemes, terminal control characters, saved project trust) are in no release yet, which is counted under negative events. No security.txt and no bounty found (14).
Orca 43
Harness reading. Anonymous usage data with an opt-out, per the README's link to its telemetry docs (15 of 30). Worktrees per agent and a sandboxed Linux build (12 of 20). No prompt-injection guidance (5). No audit log (5). A dependency-security workflow (6 of 20). 15 + 12 + 5 + 5 + 6 = 43.
Reliability Pi +17
Pi 75
Read as a local package. @earendil-works/pi-coding-agent 1.4.0 on npm (still the latest on 1 November 2026) with Node.js 22.19 or newer stated, install scripts for macOS, Linux and Windows, Nix and standalone binaries (20). A public CI workflow builds, checks and tests on every push to main and runs an MCP client conformance job. The run on the commit we cloned (ce950d7, 8 October 2026) passed, but eight of the last 15 runs on main, all on 7 and 8 October, failed. Run results weren't readable on 23 October, so this stands per the 8 October check (15). The repository API reported 308 open issues and pull requests against 113,417 stars on 8 October, not re-read on 23 October. Issues from new contributors are closed automatically and reviewed daily by maintainers, per CONTRIBUTING.md, so the open count understates what is reported, and we couldn't sample reply times (16). A dated changelog with Breaking Changes sections and migration steps, but breaking changes ship outside major versions. The Azure provider rename shipped in patch release 1.0.3 on 5 October 2026, minor release 1.2.0 on 12 October carried four (theme schema location, before_agent_start, busy-session behaviour and pi mcp list --json output), and 1.3.0 required /v1 on kimi-coding base URL overrides under Changed. The same reading as agent-zero and mistral-vibe-cli, and these breaks also take a deduction under negative events (9). 1.4.0 on 21 October 2026, with 1.0.0 dated 1 October 2026 (15).
Orca 58
Local software. Desktop and mobile builds and a Homebrew cask (20). Unit, end-to-end and platform test workflows; pass state not read (15). GitHub issues and pull requests weren't read (GitHub's pages refuse these sessions), so that line is scored absent (0). Tags to v1.4.251, no changelog file (8). Version 1.4 (15). 20 + 15 + 0 + 8 + 15 = 58.
Transparency & trust Pi +13
Pi 67
MIT (30). No privacy policy for pi.dev or the CLI was found (pi.dev/privacy, earendil.com/privacy and radius.earendil.com/privacy return 404 on 23 October 2026, and pi.dev/privacy and pi.dev/terms again on 1 November). The docs say where sessions and credentials are stored and what /share and /bug upload. The Radius alpha terms of 1 September 2026 name Earendil Works Co. and refer to a Privacy Notice we couldn't locate (10). Breaking changes are listed per release with migration steps, with no deprecation policy or notice period found. Pi Durable's README says its API changes without notice between releases (8). Install telemetry and the version check are documented in the settings and environment-variable pages with opt-outs, though the docs don't list the fields sent (16).
Orca 54
MIT (30). Privacy and telemetry docs on the site (not read) (18 of 30). No deprecation policy (5). Disclosed with an opt-out (15 of 20). 30 + 18 + 5 + 15 = 68.
Maintenance & community Pi +12
Pi 87
v1.4.0 on 21 October 2026, still the latest on npm on 1 November (30). The changelog dates 23 releases in the 90 days from 3 August, 0.84.0 on 6 August to 1.4.0 on 21 October 2026 (20). Commits land daily and the changelog credits issues and outside pull requests in most releases. New contributors' issues are closed automatically, reviewed daily, and get no reply if they miss the quality bar, per CONTRIBUTING.md. Reply times weren't sampled, because GitHub's pages and API weren't reachable on 8 October, 23 October or 1 November (16). npm, the pi.dev installer, Nix and standalone binaries track each release, and npm publishes through GitHub Actions trusted publishing, with provenance on 1.4.0 (14). Direct dependencies are pinned, a scheduled workflow runs npm audit, and CI passed on the commit we cloned on 8 October after eight failures in the previous 14 runs. CI results weren't readable on 23 October or 1 November (7).
Orca 75
Tags to v1.4.251 and commits on 6 November 2026 (30). Many releases in 90 days (20). GitHub issues and pull requests weren't read (GitHub's pages refuse these sessions), so that line is scored absent (0). Current builds (15). Extensive CI (10). 30 + 20 + 0 + 15 + 10 = 75.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Pi | Orca | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 75 | 58 | Pi +17 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 65 | Pi +19 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 70 | Pi +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 61 | 43 | Pi +18 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 40 | Pi +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 87 | 75 | Pi +12 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 54 | Pi +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -10 | 0 | |
| Total | B 62.6/100 | C 57.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Pi | Orca |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Earendil | Lovecast Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-21 | 2026-11-06 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Popularity | 113k stars, 5.2M npm/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
Orca
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Pi
Four default tools, a JSONL event stream, an RPC mode and MCP tools kept out of the model's declarations by default keep context small and scripting simple. Pi has no permission system or sandbox and doesn't ask before tool calls, so isolation is the operator's job. Version 1.4.0 is dated 21 October 2026.
Orca
An open-source orchestrator for coding agents with worker agents in their own worktrees, chat and terminal views, a browser and a CLI, on desktop and mobile, with heavy test automation. It collects anonymous usage data by default, and the cloud option's pricing wasn't found.
Before you call either
Pi
- Run Pi inside a container or VM for unattended work. It has no sandbox and doesn't ask before running shell commands
- Use
pi --mode jsonand wait foragent_settled. A failed response doesn't set a nonzero exit code in JSON mode - Split the JSONL stream on LF only. Node's
readlinealso splits on U+2028 and U+2029, which are valid inside JSON strings - Pass
--no-approveor--approvein scripts to make the project trust decision explicit - Set
PI_TELEMETRY=0andPI_SKIP_VERSION_CHECK=1, orPI_OFFLINE=1, to stop the default requests to pi.dev
Orca
- See the telemetry docs on onorca.dev to opt out of anonymous usage data
- Use the orchestration CLI to hand a large task to one agent that starts workers
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Pi or Orca?
Pi scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against Orca's 57.4 (C), and leads in every scored category.
Are Pi and Orca open source?
Yes. Pi is open source (MIT). Orca is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with Pi or Orca
- Agent Zero vs Pi
- Agent Zero vs Orca
- Aider vs Pi
- Aider vs Orca
- Amp vs Pi
- Amp vs Orca
- Antigravity CLI vs Pi
- Antigravity CLI vs Orca
- Auggie CLI vs Pi
- Auggie CLI vs Orca
- AXLR vs Pi
- AXLR vs Orca
- Claude Code vs Pi
- Claude Code vs Orca
- Cline vs Pi
- Cline vs Orca
- Conductor vs Pi
- Conductor vs Orca
- Crush vs Pi
- Crush vs Orca
- Cursor CLI vs Pi
- Cursor CLI vs Orca
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Pi
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Orca
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Pi
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Orca
- Devin vs Pi
- Devin vs Orca
- Droid CLI vs Pi
- Droid CLI vs Orca
- Pi vs Emdash
- Pi vs Gemini CLI
- Pi vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Pi vs goose
- Pi vs Harness²
- Pi vs HarnessRouter
- Pi vs Jules
- Pi vs Junie CLI
- Pi vs Kilo Code CLI
- Pi vs Kimi Code CLI
- Pi vs Kiro CLI
- Pi vs Letta
- Pi vs mini-swe-agent
- Pi vs MiniMax Code
- Pi vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Pi vs Muse Code
- Pi vs OpenAI Agents API
- Pi vs OpenAI Codex
- Pi vs OpenCode
- Pi vs OpenHands
- Pi vs OpenMausBot
- Pi vs Paseo
- Pi vs Prime Agent
- Pi vs Qoder CLI
- Pi vs Qwen Code
- Pi vs Mirror CLI
- Pi vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Pi vs Sculptor
- Pi vs T3 Code
- Pi vs Traycer
- Pi vs Unstoppable
- Pi vs Verdent
- Pi vs Vibe-Trading
- Pi vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Emdash vs Orca
- Gemini CLI vs Orca
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Orca
- goose vs Orca
- Harness² vs Orca
- HarnessRouter vs Orca
- Jules vs Orca
- Junie CLI vs Orca
- Kilo Code CLI vs Orca
- Kimi Code CLI vs Orca
- Kiro CLI vs Orca
- Letta vs Orca
- mini-swe-agent vs Orca
- MiniMax Code vs Orca
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Orca
- Muse Code vs Orca
- OpenAI Agents API vs Orca
- OpenAI Codex vs Orca
- OpenCode vs Orca
- OpenHands vs Orca
- Orca vs Paseo
- Orca vs Prime Agent
- Orca vs Qoder CLI
- Orca vs Qwen Code
- Orca vs Mirror CLI
- Orca vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Orca vs Sculptor
- Orca vs T3 Code
- Orca vs Traycer
- Orca vs Unstoppable
- Orca vs Verdent
- Orca vs Vibe-Trading
- Orca vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Clawboo vs Orca
- CLI Manager vs Orca
- Harness vs Orca
- OpenMausBot vs Orca
- Orca vs Paperclip
- Orca vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/earendil-pi-vs-orca.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/earendil-pi.json·/api/v1/tools/orca.json - From a terminal
anchor compare earendil-pi orca(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "earendil-pi", "b": "orca"}at/mcp, no key