Head to head · Agent harness · October 2026 research run
Pi vs OpenCode
Pi and OpenCode score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 68.4 (B) and 67.7 (B). Both do agent harness.
Which one, for what
Pi B
Good for Developers and pipelines that want a small, scriptable coding agent they can extend in TypeScript and drive over JSONL or RPC, inside their own container.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 75 against 68
- Maintenance & community, 87 against 81
Watch for
No permission system or sandbox. Tool calls run with the user's rights and without an approval prompt
OpenCode B
Good for Agents and pipelines that need a scriptable coding agent with a JSON event stream, an HTTP server and any model, including keyless free ones.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Most permissions default to allow, and SECURITY.md says the permission system is not a sandbox
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Pi | OpenCode | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 75 | 68 | Pi +7 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 88 | OpenCode +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 79 | OpenCode +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 61 | 60 | Pi +1 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 87 | 81 | Pi +6 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 64 | 67 | OpenCode +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -4 | -4 | |
| Total | 68.4 · B | 67.7 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Pi | OpenCode |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Earendil | Anomaly |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-07 | 2026-09-30 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-08-15 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-03-06 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 113k stars, 5.2M npm/wk | 211k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 2/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Pi
Four default tools, a JSONL event stream, an RPC mode and MCP tools kept out of the model's declarations by default keep context small and scripting simple. Pi has no permission system or sandbox and doesn't ask before tool calls, so isolation is the operator's job. Version 1.0.0 is dated 1 October 2026.
OpenCode
Runs with no key or account on free OpenCode Zen models. Most permissions default to allow, and SECURITY.md says the permission system is not a sandbox.
Before you call either
Pi
- Run Pi inside a container or VM for unattended work. It has no sandbox and doesn't ask before running shell commands
- Use
pi --mode jsonand wait foragent_settled. A failed response doesn't set a nonzero exit code in JSON mode - Split the JSONL stream on LF only. Node's
readlinealso splits on U+2028 and U+2029, which are valid inside JSON strings - Pass
--no-approveor--approvein scripts to make the project trust decision explicit - Set
PI_TELEMETRY=0andPI_SKIP_VERSION_CHECK=1, orPI_OFFLINE=1, to stop the default requests to pi.dev
OpenCode
- Add deny rules for
bashpatterns andexternal_directorybefore an unattended run. Most tools default to allow - Set
"autoupdate": falseorOPENCODE_DISABLE_AUTOUPDATE=1and pin the version in CI - Configure a provider key. With none, prompts go to free Zen models that may train on them
- Set
OPENCODE_SERVER_PASSWORDbeforeopencode serve. Without it the server runs unauthenticated - Use
opencode run --format jsonand read the event stream rather than the formatted output
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Pi or OpenCode?
Pi and OpenCode score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 68.4 (B) and 67.7 (B).
Are Pi and OpenCode open source?
Yes. Pi is open source (MIT). OpenCode is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with Pi or OpenCode
- Aider vs Pi
- Aider vs OpenCode
- Claude Code vs Pi
- Claude Code vs OpenCode
- Cline vs Pi
- Cline vs OpenCode
- Cursor CLI vs Pi
- Cursor CLI vs OpenCode
- Pi vs Gemini CLI
- Pi vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Pi vs goose
- Pi vs OpenAI Codex
- Pi vs OpenHands
- Pi vs Prime Agent
- Gemini CLI vs OpenCode
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenCode
- goose vs OpenCode
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenCode
- OpenCode vs OpenHands
- OpenCode vs Prime Agent
- OpenCode vs Paperclip
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/earendil-pi-vs-opencode.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/earendil-pi.json·/api/v1/tools/opencode.json - From a terminal
anchor compare earendil-pi opencode(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "earendil-pi", "b": "opencode"}at/mcp, no key