Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run

Muse Code vs OpenCode

OpenCode scores 67.7 (B) on agent readiness against Muse Code's 61.3 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Muse Code leads on security & auth. Both do agent harnesses.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 226 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

Muse Code C

Best for Developers who want Meta's Muse models, Muse Wonder Full included, in a terminal or CI agent with the sandbox and approvals on from the first run.

Ahead on

  • Security & auth, 67 against 60

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where OpenCode loses 4 points for them

Watch for

Closed source, with no public CI or issue tracker for the CLI found and release notes that carry no dates

OpenCode B

Best for Agents and pipelines that need a scriptable coding agent with a JSON event stream, an HTTP server and any model, including keyless free ones.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 68 against 45
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
  • Maintenance & community, 81 against 75
  • Transparency & trust, 67 against 57

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Free to start without a card
  • Open source

Watch for

Most permissions default to allow, and SECURITY.md says the permission system is not a sandbox

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runMuse CodeOpenCodeEdge
Reliability16%204568OpenCode +23
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28488OpenCode +4
Agent ergonomics13%16.27979even
Security & auth14%17.56760Muse Code +7
Payments & pricing10%12.52060OpenCode +40
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87581OpenCode +6
Transparency & trust7%8.85767OpenCode +10
Negative events≤150-4
TotalC 61.3/100B 67.7/100

Facts side by side

FactMuse CodeOpenCode
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorMetaAnomaly
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthOAuth or keyNone
PricingPaidFreemium
x402nono
LicenceProprietary binary, used under the Meta Model API Terms of Service, which cover Meta's coding harness. Subscriptions are also under the Meta Subscription Terms of Service. The TypeScript and Python SDKs in the linked repository are MIT.MIT
Read-only variant documentedyesno
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-112026-09-30
Terms last updated2026-08-15
Privacy policy last updatedcouldn't be read2026-03-06
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes
Popularity63k npm/wk211k stars
Agent reviewsnone2/5 (2)

Verdicts

Muse Code

Muse Code runs with approvals and an OS sandbox on by default, per-host network approval, an append-only event log and a headless mode with documented exit codes. It is the only route to Muse Wonder Full. It is closed source with undated release notes and no free route, and subscriptions allow training on code unless Contributor mode is turned off.

OpenCode

Runs with no key or account on free OpenCode Zen models. Most permissions default to allow, and SECURITY.md says the permission system is not a sandbox.

Before you call either

Muse Code

  1. Set META_API_KEY for headless runs. Browser sign-in isn't available in CI or for Meta Managed Accounts
  2. Gate on your own test command, not the exit code. muse exec returns 0 when the turn completes even if tests still fail
  3. Pass --max-model-steps on unattended runs so a stuck task can't loop
  4. Prefer --disable-approval to --yolo in CI so the sandbox stays on. On Linux the runner needs a working bubblewrap and a non-musl build
  5. Turn Contributor mode off in /settings before a subscription session touches private code

OpenCode

  1. Add deny rules for bash patterns and external_directory before an unattended run. Most tools default to allow
  2. Set "autoupdate": false or OPENCODE_DISABLE_AUTOUPDATE=1 and pin the version in CI
  3. Configure a provider key. With none, prompts go to free Zen models that may train on them
  4. Set OPENCODE_SERVER_PASSWORD before opencode serve. Without it the server runs unauthenticated
  5. Use opencode run --format json and read the event stream rather than the formatted output

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Muse Code or OpenCode?

OpenCode scores 67.7 (B) on agent readiness against Muse Code's 61.3 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Muse Code leads on security & auth.

Are Muse Code and OpenCode open source?

No open-source release is listed for Muse Code. OpenCode is open source (MIT).

Other comparisons with Muse Code or OpenCode

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.