Head to head · Agent harness · October 2026 research run
OpenCode vs OpenHands
OpenHands has a score of 70.9 (BB) against OpenCode's 68 (B). Both do agent harness. The largest gap is reliability, 15 points.
Which one, for what
Pick OpenCode for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Pick OpenHands for
- reliability (+15)
- security & auth (+6)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | OpenCode | OpenHands | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 68 | 83 | OpenHands +15 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 88 | 87 | OpenCode +1 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 79 | 78 | OpenCode +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 60 | 66 | OpenHands +6 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 81 | 85 | OpenHands +4 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 71 | 69 | OpenCode +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -4 | -5 | |
| Total | 68 · B | 70.9 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | OpenCode | OpenHands |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Anomaly | All Hands AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT (Agent Canvas, SDK, tools and Agent Server). OpenHands Cloud is a hosted service |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-30 |
| Popularity | 211k stars | 90k stars |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
OpenCode
Runs with no key or account on free OpenCode Zen models. Most permissions default to allow, and SECURITY.md says the permission system is not a sandbox.
OpenHands
A Docker container per conversation with OH_CONVERSATION_RUNTIME=docker, each with its own Agent Server. Confirmation mode is off by default in Agent Canvas, and the npm install gives the agent the host's whole filesystem.
Before you call either
OpenCode
- Add deny rules for
bashpatterns andexternal_directorybefore an unattended run. Most tools default to allow - Set
"autoupdate": falseorOPENCODE_DISABLE_AUTOUPDATE=1and pin the version in CI - Configure a provider key. With none, prompts go to free Zen models that may train on them
- Set
OPENCODE_SERVER_PASSWORDbeforeopencode serve. Without it the server runs unauthenticated - Use
opencode run --format jsonand read the event stream rather than the formatted output
OpenHands
- Set
AGENT_CANVAS_DISABLE_TELEMETRY=1andDO_NOT_TRACK=1before the first start - Start Canvas with
OH_CONVERSATION_RUNTIME=dockeror use the Docker image. The npm install runs the agent on the host - Turn on confirmation mode with a risk threshold. Canvas starts with it off
- Use the SDK or the Agent Server API for headless runs. The
openhands --headlessCLI is no longer maintained - Set
filter_tools_regexon the agent to keep unneeded MCP tool definitions out of the context
Other comparisons with OpenCode or OpenHands
- Aider vs OpenCode
- Aider vs OpenHands
- Claude Code vs OpenCode
- Claude Code vs OpenHands
- Cline vs OpenCode
- Cline vs OpenHands
- Cursor CLI vs OpenCode
- Cursor CLI vs OpenHands
- Gemini CLI vs OpenCode
- Gemini CLI vs OpenHands
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenCode
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenHands
- goose vs OpenCode
- goose vs OpenHands
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenCode
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenHands
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/opencode.json·/api/v1/tools/openhands.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/opencode-vs-openhands.md

