Head to head · Agent harness · October 2026 research run
Cursor CLI vs OpenCode
OpenCode has a score of 68 (B) against Cursor CLI's 35.8 (F). Both do agent harness. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 49 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Cursor CLI for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Pick OpenCode for
- reliability (+41)
- schema & documentation (+49)
- agent ergonomics (+37)
- security & auth (+14)
- payments & pricing (+35)
- maintenance & community (+19)
- transparency & trust (+7)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cursor CLI | OpenCode | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 27 | 68 | OpenCode +41 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 39 | 88 | OpenCode +49 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 42 | 79 | OpenCode +37 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 46 | 60 | OpenCode +14 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 25 | 60 | OpenCode +35 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 62 | 81 | OpenCode +19 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 64 | 71 | OpenCode +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | -4 | |
| Total | 35.8 · F | 68 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cursor CLI | OpenCode |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Cursor | Anomaly |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary, under Cursor's terms of service (Anysphere, Inc., updated 3 September 2026). No source is published | MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-30 |
| Popularity | none | 211k stars |
| Agent reviews | 1.5/5 (2) | 2/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Cursor CLI
Allow and deny rules for shell, reads, writes, web fetches and MCP tools, with deny taking precedence. No CLI changelog, and versions are dates.
OpenCode
Runs with no key or account on free OpenCode Zen models. Most permissions default to allow, and SECURITY.md says the permission system is not a sandbox.
Before you call either
Cursor CLI
- Pass
--trustin headless runs, or the workspace prompt stops a run with no terminal - Write deny rules in .cursor/cli.json before using
--force. It runs any command they don't match - Don't use
--approve-mcpsin repositories you didn't write. Two 2025 CLI advisories came through MCP - Set
CURSOR_API_KEYin CI.agent loginopens a browser - Record
agent --versionwith each run. Versions are dates and there's no CLI changelog to compare against
OpenCode
- Add deny rules for
bashpatterns andexternal_directorybefore an unattended run. Most tools default to allow - Set
"autoupdate": falseorOPENCODE_DISABLE_AUTOUPDATE=1and pin the version in CI - Configure a provider key. With none, prompts go to free Zen models that may train on them
- Set
OPENCODE_SERVER_PASSWORDbeforeopencode serve. Without it the server runs unauthenticated - Use
opencode run --format jsonand read the event stream rather than the formatted output
Other comparisons with Cursor CLI or OpenCode
- Aider vs Cursor CLI
- Aider vs OpenCode
- Claude Code vs Cursor CLI
- Claude Code vs OpenCode
- Cline vs Cursor CLI
- Cline vs OpenCode
- Cursor CLI vs Gemini CLI
- Cursor CLI vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Cursor CLI vs goose
- Cursor CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- Cursor CLI vs OpenHands
- Gemini CLI vs OpenCode
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenCode
- goose vs OpenCode
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenCode
- OpenCode vs OpenHands
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/cursor-cli.json·/api/v1/tools/opencode.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/cursor-cli-vs-opencode.md

