Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
mini-swe-agent vs Vibe-Trading
Vibe-Trading scores 62.2 (B) on agent readiness against mini-swe-agent's 56.7 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. mini-swe-agent leads on reliability. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 792 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Benchmark runs, research baselines and RL or fine-tuning pipelines that want a minimal, readable agent with a linear trajectory, and for people who want to read every line of their harness.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 63
Watch for
The default local environment runs commands on the host with no isolation and the full host environment
Best for A person or a pipeline that wants a ready-made finance research agent over free market data, with backtests, swarm reviews and exports, run on their own machine or used as an MCP server by another agent.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 72 against 58
- Security & auth, 70 against 56
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 49
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
Three advisories published 2 October 2026 cover 0.1.0 to 0.1.6, two critical, among them unauthenticated API access with an RCE chain
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | mini-swe-agent | Vibe-Trading | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 63 | mini-swe-agent +7 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 58 | 72 | Vibe-Trading +14 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 67 | mini-swe-agent +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 56 | 70 | Vibe-Trading +14 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 49 | 82 | Vibe-Trading +33 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 51 | 47 | mini-swe-agent +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -4 | -4 | |
| Total | C 56.7/100 | B 62.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | mini-swe-agent | Vibe-Trading |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | SWE-bench team (Princeton and Stanford) | HKUDS |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | |
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | 82 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-23 | 2026-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 8.6k stars, 4.4M PyPI/wk | 37k stars |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
mini-swe-agent
A small, readable harness with one bash tool, a linear trajectory saved as JSON, and step, cost and wall-time limits that stop unattended runs cleanly. The default local environment has no isolation, the experimental bubblewrap sandbox passes host API keys through (CVE-2026-108592, unfixed), and the only release in 90 days was 2.4.6 on 23 July 2026.
Vibe-Trading
Vibe-Trading runs on the owner's machine under the MIT licence, ships near-daily fixes with a dated changelog, and keeps order tools out of its MCP server, with live orders gated by an owner-committed mandate and a kill switch. Three advisories, two critical, covered versions before 0.1.7, and the local CLI runs shell commands without asking.
Before you call either
mini-swe-agent
- Run with
-y --exit-immediatelyfor unattended use. Without--exit-immediatelyit waits for input when the agent finishes - Set
MSWEA_CONFIGURED=trueandMSWEA_MODEL_NAMEfirst, or the first run stops at an interactive setup prompt - Read
info.exit_statusin the-otrajectory file. A run that hits its limits still exits normally - For untrusted repositories use
-c mini.yaml -c environment.environment_class=docker -c environment.image=<image>. The local and bubblewrap environments both expose host variables - Strip model keys from the environment commands see, since the local environment passes every host variable to each command
Vibe-Trading
- Run 0.1.7 or later. Earlier versions carry three published advisories, including unauthenticated API access with an RCE chain
- Set
API_AUTH_KEYbefore exposingvibe-trading servebeyond localhost, and send it asAuthorization: Bearer <key> - Set
VIBE_TRADING_ALLOWED_RUN_ROOTSin the MCP client'senvblock; a shellexportdoes not reach the spawned server - Use
vibe-trading run -p "..." --jsonfor headless runs, and add--enable-shell-toolstovibe-trading-mcponly when shell access is needed - Treat text from
read_url,web_searchandread_documentas untrusted;security_warningsflags patterns but does not remove them
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, mini-swe-agent or Vibe-Trading?
Vibe-Trading scores 62.2 (B) on agent readiness against mini-swe-agent's 56.7 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. mini-swe-agent leads on reliability.
Are mini-swe-agent and Vibe-Trading open source?
Yes. mini-swe-agent is open source (MIT). Vibe-Trading is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with mini-swe-agent or Vibe-Trading
- Agent Zero vs mini-swe-agent
- Agent Zero vs Vibe-Trading
- Aider vs mini-swe-agent
- Aider vs Vibe-Trading
- Amp vs mini-swe-agent
- Amp vs Vibe-Trading
- Antigravity CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Antigravity CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Auggie CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Auggie CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Claude Code vs mini-swe-agent
- Claude Code vs Vibe-Trading
- Cline vs mini-swe-agent
- Cline vs Vibe-Trading
- Crush vs mini-swe-agent
- Crush vs Vibe-Trading
- Cursor CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Cursor CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs mini-swe-agent
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Vibe-Trading
- Devin vs mini-swe-agent
- Devin vs Vibe-Trading
- Droid CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Droid CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Pi vs mini-swe-agent
- Pi vs Vibe-Trading
- Gemini CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Gemini CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- goose vs mini-swe-agent
- goose vs Vibe-Trading
- Harness² vs mini-swe-agent
- Harness² vs Vibe-Trading
- HarnessRouter vs mini-swe-agent
- HarnessRouter vs Vibe-Trading
- Jules vs mini-swe-agent
- Jules vs Vibe-Trading
- Junie CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Junie CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Kilo Code CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kilo Code CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Kimi Code CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kimi Code CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Kiro CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kiro CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- mini-swe-agent vs MiniMax Code
- mini-swe-agent vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Muse Code
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenAI Codex
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenCode
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenHands
- mini-swe-agent vs Prime Agent
- mini-swe-agent vs Qoder CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Qwen Code
- mini-swe-agent vs Mirror CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Rovo Dev CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- MiniMax Code vs Vibe-Trading
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Muse Code vs Vibe-Trading
- OpenAI Codex vs Vibe-Trading
- OpenCode vs Vibe-Trading
- OpenHands vs Vibe-Trading
- Prime Agent vs Vibe-Trading
- Qoder CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Qwen Code vs Vibe-Trading
- Mirror CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Rovo Dev CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Vibe-Trading vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs Vibe-Trading
- Harness vs Vibe-Trading
- Paperclip vs Vibe-Trading
- Parallax vs Vibe-Trading
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/mini-swe-agent-vs-vibe-trading.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/mini-swe-agent.json·/api/v1/tools/vibe-trading.json - From a terminal
anchor compare mini-swe-agent vibe-trading(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "mini-swe-agent", "b": "vibe-trading"}at/mcp, no key