Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Devin vs Vibe-Trading
Vibe-Trading scores 62.2 (B) on agent readiness against Devin's 55.7 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Devin leads on schema & documentation and transparency & trust. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 792 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Devin C
Best for A team that wants to hand whole tasks to a cloud agent and collect pull requests, driven from a pipeline or another agent.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 80 against 72
- Transparency & trust, 69 against 47
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- No incidents deducted, where Vibe-Trading loses 4 points for them
Watch for
www.devinstatus.com lists three critical incidents (22 July, 13 August, 24 September 2026) and six major ones on the cloud agent or web app since 10 July 2026
Best for A person or a pipeline that wants a ready-made finance research agent over free market data, with backtests, swarm reviews and exports, run on their own machine or used as an MCP server by another agent.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 63 against 30
- Agent ergonomics, 67 against 62
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 63
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Runs on your own machine
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
Three advisories published 2 October 2026 cover 0.1.0 to 0.1.6, two critical, among them unauthenticated API access with an RCE chain
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Devin | Vibe-Trading | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 30 | 63 | Vibe-Trading +33 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 80 | 72 | Devin +8 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 62 | 67 | Vibe-Trading +5 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 72 | 70 | Devin +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 60 | Vibe-Trading +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 63 | 82 | Vibe-Trading +19 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 69 | 47 | Devin +22 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -4 | |
| Total | C 55.7/100 | B 62.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Devin | Vibe-Trading |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Cognition AI, Inc. | HKUDS |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.devin.ai/mcp | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) |
| Auth | API key | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Cognition's Platform Terms of Service | MIT |
| Tools exposed | 13 | 82 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-07 | 2026-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-06-30 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-03-09 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | none | 37k stars |
Verdicts
Devin
The v3 API is well specified, with a public OpenAPI 3.1 file covering 239 operations, problem+json errors, cursor pagination and service-user keys tied to roles. The status page records three critical and several major incidents on the cloud agent between 22 July and 24 September 2026, and no rate limit figures or retry guidance were found in the reviewed documentation.
Vibe-Trading
Vibe-Trading runs on the owner's machine under the MIT licence, ships near-daily fixes with a dated changelog, and keeps order tools out of its MCP server, with live orders gated by an owner-committed mandate and a kill switch. Three advisories, two critical, covered versions before 0.1.7, and the local CLI runs shell commands without asking.
Before you call either
Devin
- Use a
cog_service-user key with the Member role. Legacyapk_keys fail against v3 and the MCP server with 401 or 403 - Set
max_acu_limiton every session you create. Usage is metered by the work done and has no published unit rate - Session creation is not idempotent in v3. After a timeout, list sessions by tag before creating again
- Enterprise keys and personal access tokens must send
X-Org-Idto the MCP server. Organisation-scoped keys resolve it automatically - Create scheduled work as an automation. POST to the schedules endpoint returns 403 for migrated organisations since 24 September 2026
Vibe-Trading
- Run 0.1.7 or later. Earlier versions carry three published advisories, including unauthenticated API access with an RCE chain
- Set
API_AUTH_KEYbefore exposingvibe-trading servebeyond localhost, and send it asAuthorization: Bearer <key> - Set
VIBE_TRADING_ALLOWED_RUN_ROOTSin the MCP client'senvblock; a shellexportdoes not reach the spawned server - Use
vibe-trading run -p "..." --jsonfor headless runs, and add--enable-shell-toolstovibe-trading-mcponly when shell access is needed - Treat text from
read_url,web_searchandread_documentas untrusted;security_warningsflags patterns but does not remove them
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Devin or Vibe-Trading?
Vibe-Trading scores 62.2 (B) on agent readiness against Devin's 55.7 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Devin leads on schema & documentation and transparency & trust.
Are Devin and Vibe-Trading open source?
No open-source release is listed for Devin. Vibe-Trading is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with Devin or Vibe-Trading
- Agent Zero vs Devin
- Agent Zero vs Vibe-Trading
- Aider vs Devin
- Aider vs Vibe-Trading
- Amp vs Devin
- Amp vs Vibe-Trading
- Antigravity CLI vs Devin
- Antigravity CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Auggie CLI vs Devin
- Auggie CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Claude Code vs Devin
- Claude Code vs Vibe-Trading
- Cline vs Devin
- Cline vs Vibe-Trading
- Crush vs Devin
- Crush vs Vibe-Trading
- Cursor CLI vs Devin
- Cursor CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Devin
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Vibe-Trading
- Devin vs Droid CLI
- Devin vs Pi
- Devin vs Gemini CLI
- Devin vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Devin vs goose
- Devin vs Harness²
- Devin vs HarnessRouter
- Devin vs Jules
- Devin vs Junie CLI
- Devin vs Kilo Code CLI
- Devin vs Kimi Code CLI
- Devin vs Kiro CLI
- Devin vs mini-swe-agent
- Devin vs MiniMax Code
- Devin vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Devin vs Muse Code
- Devin vs OpenAI Codex
- Devin vs OpenCode
- Devin vs OpenHands
- Devin vs Prime Agent
- Devin vs Qoder CLI
- Devin vs Qwen Code
- Devin vs Mirror CLI
- Devin vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Devin vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Droid CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Pi vs Vibe-Trading
- Gemini CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- goose vs Vibe-Trading
- Harness² vs Vibe-Trading
- HarnessRouter vs Vibe-Trading
- Jules vs Vibe-Trading
- Junie CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Kilo Code CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Kimi Code CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Kiro CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- mini-swe-agent vs Vibe-Trading
- MiniMax Code vs Vibe-Trading
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Muse Code vs Vibe-Trading
- OpenAI Codex vs Vibe-Trading
- OpenCode vs Vibe-Trading
- OpenHands vs Vibe-Trading
- Prime Agent vs Vibe-Trading
- Qoder CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Qwen Code vs Vibe-Trading
- Mirror CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Rovo Dev CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Vibe-Trading vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs Devin
- CLI Manager vs Vibe-Trading
- Devin vs Harness
- Devin vs Paperclip
- Devin vs Parallax
- Harness vs Vibe-Trading
- Paperclip vs Vibe-Trading
- Parallax vs Vibe-Trading
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/devin-vs-vibe-trading.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/devin.json·/api/v1/tools/vibe-trading.json - From a terminal
anchor compare devin vibe-trading(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "devin", "b": "vibe-trading"}at/mcp, no key