Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Kimi Code CLI vs Sculptor
Kimi Code CLI scores 58.1 (C) on agent readiness against Sculptor's 53.1 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Sculptor leads on security & auth. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 1500 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Developers on Kimi models who want a terminal agent with ACP and a local REST API, or an open-source harness that also runs Claude, GPT or Gemini models.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 68 against 43
- Schema & documentation, 85 against 45
- Agent ergonomics, 71 against 50
- Transparency & trust, 62 against 57
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
Print mode approves every tool call under Never Ask, where the dangerous-command guard is off
Sculptor D
Best for Developers who want parallel coding agents in isolated workspaces and are fine with a research preview.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 57 against 45
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- No incidents deducted, where Kimi Code CLI loses 8 points for them
Watch for
Labelled an experimental research preview that may change drastically
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Schema & documentation Kimi Code CLI +40
Kimi Code CLI 85
Framework reading. The kimi web server serves /openapi.json and /asyncapi.json, generated from its runtime validation schemas, but only from a running server behind auth, and the API is marked experimental. The ACP server's methods and capabilities are tabled (20). llms.txt indexes every page and each page is served as Markdown (10). The permission-mode, goal-mode and MCP pages say when to use each mode and what to avoid (16). The config reference gives type and default for each key, with enums for permission modes, output formats and rule decisions (13). Many examples, the server's error-code bands and ACP error codes are documented, but print-mode exit codes are documented only for goal runs (11). A dated changelog in the docs plus the technical changelog in the repository (15). Unchanged on 2 November; llms.txt now indexes 60 pages in two languages.
Sculptor 45
Harness reading. A README, specs and agent docs in the repository; no API reference (45).
Reliability Kimi Code CLI +25
Kimi Code CLI 68
Local-package reading. An install script that verifies a checksum, npm @moonshot-ai/kimi-code with Node 22.19.0 or newer stated, and Homebrew core at 2.4.1, for macOS, Linux and Windows (20). A public CI workflow runs the build, a smoke test, sharded tests on Linux, tests on Windows, lint and typecheck. GitHub's pages answer 403 in this session, so whether it passes on main wasn't checked (15). The 18 October issue and pull-request counts came from shields.io badges, a third-party copy of GitHub data this run bars, so they are struck. The clone shows 95 commits from 13 authors since 18 October and a changelog that credits merged pull requests up to #4553 in 2.4.1, but which open issues are crashes or regressions, and how fast they're answered, couldn't be read (8). Changesets changelog with Major, Minor and Patch headings and no breaking-change label since 0.28.0. 2.2.0 made executor = "kaos" configs fail validation, 2.3.0 stopped bare-name plugin skill calls and 2.3.2, a patch, removed swarms from kimi -p and ACP (10). 2.4.1, past 1.0 (15). 20 + 15 + 8 + 10 + 15 = 68.
Sculptor 43
Local software. Desktop downloads for Mac (Apple Silicon), Linux and Linux ARM64 (20). checks.yml and a PR gate run on the repository; pass state not read (15). GitHub issues and pull requests weren't read (GitHub's pages refuse these sessions), so that line is scored absent (0). sculptor-v tags up to v0.49.0, no changelog file (8). 0.x and labelled a research preview (0). 20 + 15 + 0 + 8 + 0 = 43.
Agent ergonomics Kimi Code CLI +21
Kimi Code CLI 71
Framework reading, adapted to a harness driven by a pipeline. Global tools.enabled and tools.disabled lists, per-agent tool lists, deferred MCP tool loading and a read-only Plan mode (20). stream-json output and a step limit per turn by environment variable, but steps are unlimited by default and there's no wall-time or cost limit for the main turn (13). The server API returns coded envelopes and ACP returns standard JSON-RPC errors, but print mode documents no exit codes outside goal runs (12). Retries only on transient failures and never on an exhausted quota, with --continue, --session, fork, undo and ACP session/load (16). kimi -p needs one argument, with ACP and the REST API as programmatic surfaces but no SDK package in any language (10).
Sculptor 50
Harness reading. Workspaces as isolated copies, review and merge back, and built-in skills (50).
Security & auth Sculptor +12
Kimi Code CLI 45
Harness reading of the framework checklist. 30 for credentials and what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. OAuth tokens sit in 0600 files and shell keys aren't read unless named. Telemetry is on by default and, in the 2.2.0 package read on 18 October, sends events with a device ID, session ID and model name to telemetry-logs.kimi.com. Auto-update is on by default (14). Interactive sessions ask before edits and commands, and a dangerous-command guard covers rm -rf and similar, but kimi -p runs under Never Ask, where everything is approved and the guard is off, with only static deny rules left. No sandbox found, and hooks fail open (7). The MCP page warns about untrusted servers and project .kimi-code/mcp.json entries, and since 2.1.0 project config waits for workspace trust, but no prompt-injection guidance was found for fetched web pages (6). Sessions on disk, kimi export, the kimi vis session visualiser, a diagnostic log and hooks for auditing (11). SECURITY.md names private GitHub advisories and an email, supports only the latest version and gives no response time. No security.txt was found on kimi.com, kimi.ai or moonshot.ai, and OSV, read again on 2 November 2026, lists no advisories for the package, though 2.1.0 shipped security fixes (7).
Sculptor 57
Harness reading. Product analytics, error reporting and session recording default to off in the user config, and the app asks for a telemetry level and privacy consent at first run; PostHog runs on the front end only for now (25 of 30). Each workspace is an isolated copy of the code (14 of 20). No prompt-injection guidance (5). No audit log (5). SECURITY.md (8). 25 + 14 + 5 + 5 + 8 = 57.
Transparency & trust Kimi Code CLI +5
Kimi Code CLI 62
MIT (30). The docs have no privacy page for the CLI. The Kimi terms (effective 13 August 2026, NOVASCENT PRIVATE LIMITED, Singapore) let Moonshot use content to train its services unless the user opts out by email, prospectively only, and the Kimi privacy policy says content is used for training. The Kimi Platform privacy policy keeps inputs while the account is active. Neither says which applies to CLI sessions (12). The kimi server tree prints a deprecation notice until the next major version, a table names each deprecated config key and the version that replaced it, and the Python Kimi CLI was archived with a migration guide, though its notice gives no date for when old installations stop working (13). Telemetry is documented as on, with a config key and an environment variable to turn it off, but what it collects isn't listed, and print mode ignored the opt-out until 0.41.0 (9).
Sculptor 57
MIT (30). Consent-based telemetry documented in the repository (18 of 30). The README warns of drastic changes during the research preview, with no deprecation policy (5). Opt-in telemetry (20). 30 + 18 + 5 + 20 = 73.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Kimi Code CLI | Sculptor | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 68 | 43 | Kimi Code CLI +25 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 85 | 45 | Kimi Code CLI +40 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 71 | 50 | Kimi Code CLI +21 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 45 | 57 | Sculptor +12 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 72 | 75 | Sculptor +3 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 62 | 57 | Kimi Code CLI +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -8 | 0 | |
| Total | C 58.1/100 | D 53.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Kimi Code CLI | Sculptor |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Moonshot AI | Imbue, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-11-06 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-08-13 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-08-13 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | not read yet |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not read yet |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not read yet |
| Popularity | 37k npm/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
Verdicts
Kimi Code CLI
MIT-licensed, with 30 releases from 4 August to 30 October 2026, kimi -p with stream-json output, an ACP server and a local REST API. Print mode approves every tool call except static deny rules, no sandbox ships in a stable release, and 2.x minor releases changed behaviour without notice.
Sculptor
Imbue's open-source app for parallel coding agents in isolated workspaces, with telemetry off until you choose otherwise. It's an experimental research preview that warns of bugs and drastic changes, Mac and Linux only, with no changelog.
Before you call either
Kimi Code CLI
kimi -papproves every tool call. Add[[permission.rules]]deny entries and run it in a container, since no sandbox ships- Set
KIMI_LOOP_MAX_STEPS_PER_TURNfor unattended runs. Steps per turn are unlimited by default - Pass the model with
KIMI_MODEL_NAME,KIMI_MODEL_API_KEYandKIMI_MODEL_PROVIDER_TYPE.OPENAI_API_KEYorANTHROPIC_API_KEYin the shell is ignored otherwise - Pin the CLI version in pipelines and read the changelog before upgrading. Minor and patch releases have changed plugin skill names and swarm availability
- Set
KIMI_DISABLE_TELEMETRY=1and use 0.41.0 or later, since earlier print-mode runs ignored it
Sculptor
- Download from the README's links, connect a repository and create a workspace before prompting
- Review the diff before merging a workspace back to main
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Kimi Code CLI or Sculptor?
Kimi Code CLI scores 58.1 (C) on agent readiness against Sculptor's 53.1 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Sculptor leads on security & auth.
Are Kimi Code CLI and Sculptor open source?
Yes. Kimi Code CLI is open source (MIT). Sculptor is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with Kimi Code CLI or Sculptor
- Agent Zero vs Kimi Code CLI
- Agent Zero vs Sculptor
- Aider vs Kimi Code CLI
- Aider vs Sculptor
- Amp vs Kimi Code CLI
- Amp vs Sculptor
- Antigravity CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Sculptor
- Auggie CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Sculptor
- AXLR vs Kimi Code CLI
- AXLR vs Sculptor
- Claude Code vs Kimi Code CLI
- Claude Code vs Sculptor
- Cline vs Kimi Code CLI
- Cline vs Sculptor
- Conductor vs Kimi Code CLI
- Conductor vs Sculptor
- Crush vs Kimi Code CLI
- Crush vs Sculptor
- Cursor CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Cursor CLI vs Sculptor
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Kimi Code CLI
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Sculptor
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Kimi Code CLI
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Sculptor
- Devin vs Kimi Code CLI
- Devin vs Sculptor
- Droid CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Droid CLI vs Sculptor
- Pi vs Kimi Code CLI
- Pi vs Sculptor
- Emdash vs Kimi Code CLI
- Emdash vs Sculptor
- Gemini CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Gemini CLI vs Sculptor
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Sculptor
- goose vs Kimi Code CLI
- goose vs Sculptor
- Harness² vs Kimi Code CLI
- Harness² vs Sculptor
- HarnessRouter vs Kimi Code CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Sculptor
- Jules vs Kimi Code CLI
- Jules vs Sculptor
- Junie CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Junie CLI vs Sculptor
- Kilo Code CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Kilo Code CLI vs Sculptor
- Kimi Code CLI vs Kiro CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Letta
- Kimi Code CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kimi Code CLI vs MiniMax Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Muse Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenAI Agents API
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenCode
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenHands
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kimi Code CLI vs Orca
- Kimi Code CLI vs Paseo
- Kimi Code CLI vs Prime Agent
- Kimi Code CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs Mirror CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs T3 Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs Traycer
- Kimi Code CLI vs Unstoppable
- Kimi Code CLI vs Verdent
- Kimi Code CLI vs Vibe-Trading
- Kimi Code CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Kiro CLI vs Sculptor
- Letta vs Sculptor
- mini-swe-agent vs Sculptor
- MiniMax Code vs Sculptor
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Sculptor
- Muse Code vs Sculptor
- OpenAI Agents API vs Sculptor
- OpenAI Codex vs Sculptor
- OpenCode vs Sculptor
- OpenHands vs Sculptor
- Orca vs Sculptor
- Paseo vs Sculptor
- Prime Agent vs Sculptor
- Qoder CLI vs Sculptor
- Qwen Code vs Sculptor
- Mirror CLI vs Sculptor
- Rovo Dev CLI vs Sculptor
- Sculptor vs T3 Code
- Sculptor vs Traycer
- Sculptor vs Unstoppable
- Sculptor vs Verdent
- Sculptor vs Vibe-Trading
- Sculptor vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Clawboo vs Kimi Code CLI
- Clawboo vs Sculptor
- CLI Manager vs Kimi Code CLI
- CLI Manager vs Sculptor
- Harness vs Kimi Code CLI
- Harness vs Sculptor
- Kimi Code CLI vs Paperclip
- Kimi Code CLI vs Parallax
- OpenMausBot vs Sculptor
- Paperclip vs Sculptor
- Parallax vs Sculptor
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/kimi-code-cli-vs-sculptor.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/kimi-code-cli.json·/api/v1/tools/sculptor.json - From a terminal
anchor compare kimi-code-cli sculptor(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "kimi-code-cli", "b": "sculptor"}at/mcp, no key