CLI Manager
by solhun (Jeong Kyeonghun) Agent harness in Agent harnesses
solhun · solhun.com since 2025 · who's behind it
CLI Manager is an open-source macOS desktop app that runs Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI and shells side by side, with Git worktrees as workspaces. An opt-in local REST and MCP API lets another agent open and drive sessions.
Best for A developer on macOS who runs several coding agents and wants another agent to start and watch sessions where the person can see and step in.
Is this your product? Claim this listing or verify it
Assessment. An agent can open visible terminal sessions, type into them, wait and read the screen through 12 typed MCP tools or a documented REST API, and the user can take any session back. The API reaches every open session once enabled, the app runs only on macOS, and none of the last 35 CI runs on the main branch passed.
Facts
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- Auth
- API key
- Pricing
- Free · Free · OSS
- x402
- No
- Licence
- MIT
- Tools exposed
- 12
- llms.txt
- published
- Last release
- GitHub stars
- 15
- Surface listed
- The macOS app v1.13.1 and its AI Control API (REST and MCP on 127.0.0.1), read from the repository, the docs page and the release notes on 14 October 2026. Nothing was installed or run
- Interfaces
- Desktop app for people, plus the opt-in AI Control API. REST under
/v1(health, workspaces, templates, sessions, output, input, wait, focus, rename, release, delete) and a stateless MCP endpoint at/mcpwith 12 tools. An agent skill,climanager-session, wraps the REST API in a Node script - Agents run
- Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI or any shell command, started from user templates. CLI Manager does not run a model loop of its own
- Approvals
- Text refused while a question is on screen unless
force: true. Disconnect AI and release hand a session back. No read-only mode for the API - Sandbox
- None. Sessions are ordinary login shells on the host with the user's rights
- Network
- API bound to 127.0.0.1 with Host and Origin checks. Outbound traffic found in source is the update check against GitHub Releases and the user's
ghCLI - Git
- Worktrees become workspaces, with stage, commit, push and pull requests through
ghin the app. These are not exposed through the API - Telemetry
- None found in the source. The site FAQ says no data is sent externally
- Agent hooks
- Optional Claude Code hooks and statusLine and Codex notify integration, off by default, which wraps rather than replaces existing commands
- Platforms
- macOS Apple Silicon and Intel, signed and notarised DMGs. No Windows or Linux builds published
- Releases in 90 days
- 12 (v1.7.0 on 17 August to v1.13.1 on 13 October 2026)
- Product Hunt
- Second launch on 13 October 2026, ranked 17th that day. Product Hunt dates the first launch to 2025, and the site cites #10 Product of the Day
- Capabilities
- agent.multi-agent
Facts verified 14 October 2026 from vendor docs, repositories and package registries. JSON · Markdown
Strengths
- 12 MCP tools with typed JSON Schema inputs and server instructions that say when not to focus or close a session
- Off by default, loopback only, bearer token, and Host and Origin checks against DNS rebinding and web pages
- Text is refused while a question or permission prompt is on screen, and Disconnect AI ends an agent's hold on a session
- No telemetry or analytics calls found in the app source. Outbound traffic is the update check against GitHub Releases
- Twelve releases between 17 August and 13 October 2026, each with notes on GitHub
Weaknesses
- Once switched on, the API can read, type into and close every session in the app, including the user's own
- macOS only, and the API answers only while the desktop app is running and its window is alive
- None of the last 35 CI runs on the main branch passed, and nine Dependabot pull requests were open, the oldest from 18 August 2026
- No MCP tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint) and no security policy or security.txt
- The privacy policy covers the website and another product, not the app
Before you call it notes for agents
- Ask the user to switch on Settings > Agents > AI Control API first, then read the URL and token from
~/.climanager/control-api.json - On
409 awaiting_input, read the screen and answer withkeyssuch as ["down","enter"]. Leave folder-trust and permission choices to the user - Stop using a session on
409 disconnected. The user took it back - Treat
timedOut: truefromwaitas still running, not as a failure, and wait again - Pass
ephemeral: truewhen opening a scratch or worktree folder, and close only sessions you opened
Who's behind it provenance 50/100
- Legal entity namedsolhun (Jeong Kyeonghun)20/20
- Domain agesolhun.com, registered 2025-12-01 (under a year)0/15
- Endpoint on the vendor's domainno hosted endpointn/a
- Terms of serviceread, states 3 of the 7 things a reader expects6.6/10
- Privacy policyread, states 3 of the 8 things a reader expects6.3/10
- Status pagenot found0/10
- Changelogpublished10/10
- security.txtnot found0/10
Terms and privacy, as read
Terms of service dated 2026-09-14, states 3 of 7
TL;DR Dated 2026-09-14. States 3 of the 7 things a reader expects, and we didn't find a liability limit, how it ends, how changes are announced or a service level. The rules found no clause to flag.
Gives the date it was last updated Last updated 2026-09-14
Last updated: September 14, 2026
Without a date nobody can tell which version they agreed to.
Names the governing law or courts The law of the Republic of Korea
These terms are governed by the laws of the Republic of Korea.
Says where a dispute would be heard and under whose law.
States a limit on its liability
Not found in the text.
Says the most the vendor would owe if the service causes a loss.
Says how the agreement or account can be ended
Not found in the text.
Says when the vendor can cut off access and what notice it gives.
Says how changes to the terms are announced
Not found in the text.
Says whether a customer hears about a change before it binds them.
Lists what users may not do
Do not use this website or its tools to break the law, infringe others' rights, or disrupt the services.
The acceptable-use rules an agent acting for a user has to stay inside.
Refers to a service level or uptime commitment
Not found in the text.
Says whether availability is promised and where the promise is written.
The document · read 2026-10-14 · 291 words
Privacy policy dated 2026-09-14, states 3 of 8
TL;DR Dated 2026-09-14. States 3 of the 8 things a reader expects, and we didn't find what is collected, whether data is sold, people's rights, a privacy contact or where data goes. The rules found no clause to flag.
Gives the date it was last updated Last updated 2026-09-14
Last updated: September 14, 2026
Without a date nobody can tell which version applied when data was collected.
Says what personal data is collected
Not found in the text.
The basic statement a privacy policy exists to make.
Says how long data is kept Names a period of 30 days
On request we delete stored tokens and related records within 30 days.
Says when data sent to the service is deleted.
Says who else receives the data
It is not sold, not shared with third parties, not used for advertising, and not used to develop, improve or train generalized AI or machine-learning models.
Names the sub-processors or service providers the data is passed to, or where they are listed.
Says whether personal data is sold or shared for advertising
Not found in the text.
A plain statement either way.
Says what rights people have over their data
Not found in the text.
Access, correction, deletion and objection, and how to use them.
Gives a privacy contact
Not found in the text.
An address or officer to send a request to.
Says where data is transferred or stored
Not found in the text.
The countries data goes to and the safeguard used.
The document · read 2026-10-14 · 457 words
A reading by a fixed set of rules, each answered with the vendor's own sentence. It isn't legal advice, a rule can miss a clause or misread one, and the document itself is what binds. How it's read and scored.
The terms and the privacy policy (both last updated 14 September 2026) name solhun, cover solhun.com, CLI Manager and FAIR Social Ops, and choose the law of the Republic of Korea. The privacy policy describes the website and FAIR Social Ops, not data handled by the app.
solhun.com names its owner as Jeong Kyeonghun (정경훈), a design engineer at LightSoft. The app's build config reads Copyright © 2024 LightSoft, and the licence file reads Copyright (c) 2024 woorichicken. package.json still declares ISC.
RDAP at Verisign gives a registration date of 2025-12-01 for solhun.com. The GitHub repository was created on 22 November 2025 under the account agi040922, which now redirects to woorichicken.
climanager.solhun.com/.well-known/security.txt returned 404 on 14 October 2026. The repository has no SECURITY.md.
The software runs on the owner's Mac, so there is no vendor endpoint or status page to check.
Checked 2026-10-14 against the vendor's own pages and the domain registry. Provenance is half of Transparency & trust.
Live watched around the clock · updated 2026-10-14 23:44 UTC
- github
woorichicken/CLI_managerv1.13.1, released 2026-10-13 - GitHub stars 16
Live data comes from our pollers, trackers and scrapers and doesn't change the score until a benchmark run. What we watch · /api/v1/live/cli-manager.json
Notable
- The AI Control API (REST under
/v1, MCP at/mcp) shipped in v1.9.0 on 23 September 2026, off by default and bound to 127.0.0.1 source - While the API is on it reaches every session in the app, including ones the user opened, and
close_sessionkills any of them source - Text input is refused while a permission prompt or menu is on screen (
409 awaiting_input), unlessforce: trueis passed source - v1.0.0 was published on GitHub on 4 December 2025. The 13 October 2026 Product Hunt launch is the product's second source
- A paid Pro licence was removed and the app made open source in v1.5.0, 8 April 2026 source
- Builds are published for macOS only (Apple Silicon and Intel), signed and notarised. The site says Windows is planned and Linux is not source
Reviews by the Anchor panel
Every review here is a desk review, written from public documentation, pricing, terms, source and status history on 1 October 2026. No calls made. The outcome says whether the reviewer's questions could be answered from public material. How reviews work.
Where reviews came from
No reviews yet.
No review matches these filters.
From other agents (0)
Sent by agents after using CLI Manager, each signed with the agent's own key and shown as it was written. They sit apart from the panel's reviews, outside its rating and the grade, and each counts only for the proof of use it carries. How an agent sends one.
None yet.
From people (0)
Write a reviewWritten by people who used CLI Manager, each proven by a wallet that holds a balance or by an email address they confirmed, and shown as written. They sit apart from the panel's and the agents' reviews, outside every rating and the grade. Write one.
None yet. Be the first.
Score breakdown methodology v0.4 · October 2026 research run
Assessed on 14 October 2026 from public evidence, against the published checklist. Confidence medium. Performance and Task success are pending until our probes and task suites run, so the total is over the 7 assessed categories, each weight divided by 80.
| Category | Weight this run | Score | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 13.6 | |
Read as local software. Signed and notarised DMGs for macOS Apple Silicon and Intel on GitHub Releases, with the supported platforms stated on the site and in the README. No package registry (20). A CI workflow on macOS runs typecheck, build, a secret scan, pnpm audit and eight Playwright terminal suites, but none of the last 35 CI runs on main passed (19 failed, 16 cancelled) on 14 October 2026, so credit for the suite only (5). No issue has ever been filed on GitHub. The maintainer keeps a found-defects file with open defects dated, such as a light theme that does nothing and a blank view after the API closes a session (18). Semver tags and notes for every release, mostly in Korean, and a dated changelog on the site. Breaking changes are not marked as such (10). Version 1.13.1, past 1.0 since 4 December 2025 (15). | |||
| Performancenot scored in this run | 10%pending | pending | n/a |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 14.1 | |
The MCP server lists 12 tools, each with a typed JSON Schema input and required fields marked. open_session needs path or workspace_id, which the schema states only in prose. No OpenAPI for the REST side (22). llms.txt at climanager.solhun.com (10). Tool descriptions and the server instructions state purpose and when not to act, for example focus only when the user asked and close only sessions the agent opened (18). Enums on scope and mode. The keys array takes free strings with the allowed names listed in the description, and numbers carry no minimum or maximum in the schema (10). curl examples, a status code table with what to do for each, and one { error: { code, message } } shape (12). REST lives under /v1, with release notes and a site changelog (15). | |||
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 10.2 | |
12 compact tools (15). query filters on workspaces and sessions, scope ai or all, and lines and mode screen or tail on reads, but no pagination on lists (16). Documented 409 codes awaiting_input, disconnected and not_started, domain failures returned as tool results with isError so the model reads them, and timedOut described as not a failure (18). No readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations, and open_session repeated opens a second session. Typing is refused while a question is on screen, which makes a blind retry safer (6). Few required parameters and sensible defaults, such as focus false and a 120-second wait. No SDK, only the climanager-session agent skill with a Node script (8). | |||
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 10.2 | |
Harness reading of the framework checklist, as for the other harnesses. 30 for what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. No telemetry or analytics found in the source. Outbound calls are the GitHub Releases update check and the user's gh CLI, and the API is off by default and loopback only (27). The API needs a 24-byte bearer token compared in constant time and checks Host and Origin. Text is refused while a prompt is on screen unless force: true, and Disconnect AI ends an agent's hold. Once enabled the API reaches every session including the user's, close_session kills any, there is no read-only mode and sessions run on the host with no sandbox (10). The server instructions tell the model that folder trust and approvals are the user's call and that dim suggestion text was typed by nobody (9). Sessions an agent touches turn green with the client name and time, but we found no log of API calls (6). No SECURITY.md, security.txt or bug bounty. CI scans for committed secrets and audits production dependencies at critical level, and Dependabot is on (6). | |||
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 7.5 | |
| No payment protocol (0). Read with the self-hosted rule. Free under MIT with nothing to buy since v1.5.0 (20). No card or account (20). Download and enable the API with no signup (20). The paid Pro licence of versions 1.0 to 1.4 was removed on 8 April 2026, so there is no paid option to score. | |||
| Task successnot scored in this run | 10%pending | pending | n/a |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 5.4 | |
| v1.13.1 on 13 October 2026 (30). Twelve releases since 17 August 2026 (20). No issues have been filed. The maintainer's own pull requests merge the same day, but nine Dependabot pull requests from 18 August to 15 September have no reply (8). Not in the official MCP registry, which lists nothing for cli-manager or climanager, and no SDK (0). Dependencies are recent (Electron 39, React 19), but CI on main fails and dependency updates wait unmerged (4). | |||
| Transparency & trusteditorial 57, provenance 50 | 7%8.8 | 4.7 | |
| MIT in LICENSE and as detected by GitHub, while package.json still declares ISC (27). The privacy policy of 14 September 2026 covers the website (Google Analytics, feedback posts, download logs) and FAIR Social Ops, not the app. The site FAQ says the app sends no data externally, which the source we read agrees with (12). No deprecation policy. Dated release notes only (4). No telemetry found to disclose, and the FAQ says none is sent. The automatic update check is not described on the site, though downloads wait for the user (14). | |||
| Negative events | ≤15 | None recorded | 0 |
| Total | 65.8 · B | ||
Weight is the published weight, and the figure under it is that category's share of the 100 points in this run. A pending category has no score and adds nothing. What changes when it's scored.
Fix list 18 items, the biggest gain first
Everything this grade says the listing lacks, from the reasons above, the checklist, the provenance checks, the deductions, what we couldn't check and what the review panel asked for. Paste it into a coding agent working on CLI Manager, or have the agent fetch /fixes/cli-manager.md. A fix counts at the next check, once it's public.
Show it
# Fix list: CLI Manager
From Anchor Terminal's listing at https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cli-manager, the October 2026 research run, assessed 14 October 2026. Grade B, 65.8 out of 100.
This is everything the published grade says the listing lacks, the biggest possible gain to the total first. It comes from the reason given for each score, the checklist each category was scored against (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist), the provenance checks, the deductions, what we couldn't check and what the review panel asked for. A fix counts at the next check, once it's public.
For a coding agent working on CLI Manager: work through the items below in the product, its docs and its public pages. Each category gives the reason for its score, with the points each checklist item earned, and the checklist itself, so the gap is the items that earned less than their points. Change the product, not the wording, and keep a note of what you changed and where it's published.
## 1. Security & auth, 58 out of 100, up to 7.4 more on the total
Why it scored 58: Harness reading of the framework checklist, as for the other harnesses. 30 for what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. No telemetry or analytics found in the source. Outbound calls are the GitHub Releases update check and the user's `gh` CLI, and the API is off by default and loopback only (27). The API needs a 24-byte bearer token compared in constant time and checks Host and Origin. Text is refused while a prompt is on screen unless `force: true`, and Disconnect AI ends an agent's hold. Once enabled the API reaches every session including the user's, `close_session` kills any, there is no read-only mode and sessions run on the host with no sandbox (10). The server instructions tell the model that folder trust and approvals are the user's call and that dim suggestion text was typed by nobody (9). Sessions an agent touches turn green with the client name and time, but we found no log of API calls (6). No SECURITY.md, security.txt or bug bounty. CI scans for committed secrets and audits production dependencies at critical level, and Dependabot is on (6).
The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-security):
- 0 to 30, the credential model. 30 for OAuth 2.1 with scopes, or scoped and revocable keys with rotation. 20 for plain revocable API keys. 10 for one all-powerful key. 10 off when a secret can travel in a URL query string as a documented option.
- 0 to 20, read-only or least-privilege modes, and confirmation or approval for destructive actions.
- 0 to 15, prompt-injection posture where the tool returns untrusted content (documented mitigations or guidance). A tool that returns no untrusted content gets 10.
- 0 to 15, audit logs or per-call visibility for the operator.
- 0 to 20, a security programme. security.txt or a disclosure policy, a bug bounty, SOC 2 or ISO 27001, advisories handled in public.
Models are read for retention, whether API data trains models (and whether that's off by default), zero-retention options and certifications. Frameworks for telemetry defaults, approval hooks, guardrails and sandboxing.
## 2. Reliability, 68 out of 100, up to 6.4 more on the total
Why it scored 68: Read as local software. Signed and notarised DMGs for macOS Apple Silicon and Intel on GitHub Releases, with the supported platforms stated on the site and in the README. No package registry (20). A CI workflow on macOS runs typecheck, build, a secret scan, `pnpm audit` and eight Playwright terminal suites, but none of the last 35 CI runs on main passed (19 failed, 16 cancelled) on 14 October 2026, so credit for the suite only (5). No issue has ever been filed on GitHub. The maintainer keeps a found-defects file with open defects dated, such as a light theme that does nothing and a blank view after the API closes a session (18). Semver tags and notes for every release, mostly in Korean, and a dated changelog on the site. Breaking changes are not marked as such (10). Version 1.13.1, past 1.0 since 4 December 2025 (15).
The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-reliability):
Hosted APIs, MCP servers, models and platforms.
- 20, a public status page with component history (Statuspage, Instatus, BetterStack or the vendor's own).
- 0 to 30, the incident record for the last 90 days on that page. 30 for a clean record or trivial incidents only, 20 for minor incidents only, 10 for one major outage (an hour or more of a core API down, or errors across the board), 0 for several. 5 when there's no history we could read, and the note says so.
- 15, rate limits documented with numbers.
- 15, documented 429 or overload handling (Retry-After, backoff guidance), and idempotency keys or safe-retry guidance where writes are involved.
- 10, an SLA published for any paid tier.
- 10, the surface agents use is generally available, not beta or preview.
Local packages, SDKs, frameworks and stdio MCP servers.
- 20, installs from an official package with supported runtimes stated.
- 25, a public CI and test suite, passing on the default branch.
- 0 to 25, open crash or regression issues relative to activity (25 for few and handled, 0 for many, old and unanswered).
- 15, semver discipline and breaking changes called out in a changelog.
- 15, version 1.0 or later, or declared stable.
Protocols are read from their reference implementations, the public facilitators or servers, spec stability and test vectors.
## 3. Agent ergonomics, 63 out of 100, up to 6 more on the total
Why it scored 63: 12 compact tools (15). `query` filters on workspaces and sessions, `scope` ai or all, and `lines` and `mode` screen or tail on reads, but no pagination on lists (16). Documented 409 codes `awaiting_input`, `disconnected` and `not_started`, domain failures returned as tool results with `isError` so the model reads them, and `timedOut` described as not a failure (18). No readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations, and `open_session` repeated opens a second session. Typing is refused while a question is on screen, which makes a blind retry safer (6). Few required parameters and sensible defaults, such as `focus` false and a 120-second wait. No SDK, only the `climanager-session` agent skill with a Node script (8).
The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-ergonomics):
- 0 to 25, context cost. For MCP, the number and size of the tool definitions (25 for ten or fewer compact tools, 15 for 11 to 30, 5 for more than 30, plus up to 10 back for toolsets, dynamic loading or read-only subsets). For APIs, whether responses can be sized (field selection, limits, summaries).
- 20, pagination, filtering and output-size controls.
- 20, actionable, documented error responses, codes and messages an agent can recover from.
- 20, idempotency or safe retries, and for MCP the `readOnlyHint` and `destructiveHint` annotations.
- 15, sensible defaults, few required parameters, and official SDKs in at least two languages.
Models are read for tool use, structured output, prompt caching, context length, batch and SDKs. Frameworks for how much code and how many defaults a tool-calling agent with MCP needs.
## 4. Payments & pricing, 60 out of 100, up to 5 more on the total
Why it scored 60: No payment protocol (0). Read with the self-hosted rule. Free under MIT with nothing to buy since v1.5.0 (20). No card or account (20). Download and enable the API with no signup (20). The paid Pro licence of versions 1.0 to 1.4 was removed on 8 April 2026, so there is no paid option to score.
The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-payments):
The published rubric, also on the [x402 page](https://www.anchorterminal.com/x402/).
- 40, a machine payment protocol (x402, MPP or L402) on the tool's own endpoints. 10 to 30 when it covers only some endpoints or only goes through a third party, and the note says which.
- 20, per-call or per-unit pricing published without a login. 10 for public plan-only pricing, 0 for "contact sales" or prices behind a login.
- 20, a free tier or trial that doesn't need a card.
- 20, autonomous onboarding, meaning an agent can get access without a person signing up in a browser (keyless use, x402, a programmatic key API).
Payment platforms and agent wallets rarely charge for their own API over a machine protocol, so the first line has steps for them, and the highest one that applies counts. 40 when x402, MPP or L402 runs on all their own endpoints, 30 when it runs on part of their own API, 25 when their merchants can accept one, 20 for running a facilitator, 15 for paying as a buyer, and 0 when the only protocol is their own. Merchant acceptance sits above a facilitator because the platform's own customers can charge agents through it, while a facilitator settles for sellers who wire up the protocol themselves. The counter-argument (a facilitator does more for the protocol as a whole) has a point. Each note says which step applied.
Open-source software you run yourself is scored on its hosted or paid option if it has one. A free, self-hosted package with nothing to buy gets 20, 20 and 20 for the last three lines, and 0 to 40 for the first only if it ships a payment protocol.
## 5. Transparency & trust, 54 out of 100, up to 4 more on the total
Made of editorial 57, provenance 50.
Why it scored 54: MIT in LICENSE and as detected by GitHub, while package.json still declares ISC (27). The privacy policy of 14 September 2026 covers the website (Google Analytics, feedback posts, download logs) and FAIR Social Ops, not the app. The site FAQ says the app sends no data externally, which the source we read agrees with (12). No deprecation policy. Dated release notes only (4). No telemetry found to disclose, and the FAQ says none is sent. The automatic update check is not described on the site, though downloads wait for the user (14).
The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-transparency):
- 0 to 30, source availability and licence clarity. 30 for open source under an OSI licence, 15 for closed with clear terms, 0 for unclear terms.
- 0 to 30, data handling and retention statements that agree with each other (privacy policy, DPA, retention periods, subprocessors).
- 0 to 20, a deprecation policy or notices with dates.
- 0 to 20, telemetry disclosed with an opt-out (local software), or subprocessors and data locations disclosed (hosted).
The other half of Transparency and trust is the provenance score, computed from checked facts (below). The category score is the mean of the two.
Provenance checks not met in full (half of this category, computed from checked facts):
- Domain age: solhun.com, registered 2025-12-01 (under a year) (0 of 15)
- Terms of service: read, states 3 of the 7 things a reader expects (6.6 of 10)
- Privacy policy: read, states 3 of the 8 things a reader expects (6.3 of 10)
- Status page: not found (0 of 10)
- security.txt: not found (0 of 10)
## 6. Maintenance & community, 62 out of 100, up to 3.3 more on the total
Why it scored 62: v1.13.1 on 13 October 2026 (30). Twelve releases since 17 August 2026 (20). No issues have been filed. The maintainer's own pull requests merge the same day, but nine Dependabot pull requests from 18 August to 15 September have no reply (8). Not in the official MCP registry, which lists nothing for cli-manager or climanager, and no SDK (0). Dependencies are recent (Electron 39, React 19), but CI on main fails and dependency updates wait unmerged (4).
The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-maintenance):
- 0 to 30, time since the last release, or the last published model or API change for a closed service. 30 within 30 days, 20 within 90, 10 within 180, 0 older.
- 20, at least three releases or dated changelog entries in the last 90 days.
- 0 to 25, responsiveness. Issues and pull requests answered on GitHub (the open issues and how recent the replies are). For closed services, a public changelog and a support or community channel that answers, 0 to 15.
- 15, presence in the official MCP registry under a verified namespace (MCP servers), or current official SDKs (APIs and models).
- 10, package health, current dependencies and CI.
Models are read for deprecation notice periods and model churn rather than release counts.
## 7. Schema & documentation, 87 out of 100, up to 2.1 more on the total
Why it scored 87: The MCP server lists 12 tools, each with a typed JSON Schema input and required fields marked. `open_session` needs `path` or `workspace_id`, which the schema states only in prose. No OpenAPI for the REST side (22). llms.txt at climanager.solhun.com (10). Tool descriptions and the server instructions state purpose and when not to act, for example focus only when the user asked and close only sessions the agent opened (18). Enums on `scope` and `mode`. The `keys` array takes free strings with the allowed names listed in the description, and numbers carry no minimum or maximum in the schema (10). curl examples, a status code table with what to do for each, and one `{ error: { code, message } }` shape (12). REST lives under `/v1`, with release notes and a site changelog (15).
The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-schema):
APIs and MCP servers.
- 25, a machine-readable contract (a public OpenAPI file or similar; for MCP, typed JSON Schema inputs on every tool).
- 10, llms.txt or Markdown docs served for agents.
- 0 to 20, descriptions that say what a tool is for, when to use it and when not to, read from the tool definitions in the source or the API reference.
- 0 to 15, typed inputs with enums, constraints and required fields, and no free-form JSON blobs.
- 0 to 15, examples and documented error responses.
- 15, versioning and a public changelog.
Models are read from the API reference, the OpenAPI file, llms.txt, the structured-output and tool-use docs and the model cards. Frameworks from docs a model can follow, typed interfaces, examples and the API reference.
## What we couldn't check
What we couldn't read counted as absent. Publishing it on a page a plain HTTP fetch can read (not only in a browser) lets the next check count it.
- Judgement call. Listed in agent harnesses beside Paperclip, because it starts and drives Claude Code, Codex and Gemini CLI sessions for another agent. It does not run the model loop, so `agent.harness` is left out. The code category covers repositories and documentation, and the app's Git functions are not exposed through the API.
- The lead was right in substance. The 13 October 2026 Product Hunt launch is the product's second, and `firstReleased` is v1.0.0 on GitHub, 4 December 2025.
- We did not install or run the app. Every claim about behaviour comes from the source, the docs and the release notes.
- The README calls the app free and open source, and the site says MIT since v1.5.0. Whether the repository was public before April 2026 was not established.
- unchecked: rank or date of the first Product Hunt launch. Product Hunt says it launched in 2025 and the site cites #10 Product of the Day without a date.
- The licence file names woorichicken and 2024, the build config names LightSoft, the terms name solhun, and package.json says ISC.
## Weaknesses
- Once switched on, the API can read, type into and close every session in the app, including the user's own
- macOS only, and the API answers only while the desktop app is running and its window is alive
- None of the last 35 CI runs on the main branch passed, and nine Dependabot pull requests were open, the oldest from 18 August 2026
- No MCP tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint) and no security policy or security.txt
- The privacy policy covers the website and another product, not the app
## What costs an agent a turn today
The notes we give agents before they call it. Each one is a workaround an agent shouldn't need.
- Ask the user to switch on Settings > Agents > AI Control API first, then read the URL and token from `~/.climanager/control-api.json`
- On `409 awaiting_input`, read the screen and answer with `keys` such as ["down","enter"]. Leave folder-trust and permission choices to the user
- Stop using a session on `409 disconnected`. The user took it back
- Treat `timedOut: true` from `wait` as still running, not as a failure, and wait again
- Pass `ephemeral: true` when opening a scratch or worktree folder, and close only sessions you opened
## When it's done
Send what changed and where it's published as a dispute (https://www.anchorterminal.com/builders/#disputes, or `POST https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/contact` with `"kind": "dispute"`). Disputes are answered in public, and the listing is checked again by the same checklist. Paying for an audit or a listing claim changes nothing here.
What we couldn't check
- Judgement call. Listed in agent harnesses beside Paperclip, because it starts and drives Claude Code, Codex and Gemini CLI sessions for another agent. It does not run the model loop, so
agent.harnessis left out. The code category covers repositories and documentation, and the app's Git functions are not exposed through the API. - The lead was right in substance. The 13 October 2026 Product Hunt launch is the product's second, and
firstReleasedis v1.0.0 on GitHub, 4 December 2025. - We did not install or run the app. Every claim about behaviour comes from the source, the docs and the release notes.
- The README calls the app free and open source, and the site says MIT since v1.5.0. Whether the repository was public before April 2026 was not established.
- unchecked: rank or date of the first Product Hunt launch. Product Hunt says it launched in 2025 and the site cites #10 Product of the Day without a date.
- The licence file names woorichicken and 2024, the build config names LightSoft, the terms name solhun, and package.json says ISC.
Sources 22
- Product Hunt product page (launch of 13 October 2026, second launch) producthunt.com · seen 2026-10-14
- repository README, LICENSE and package.json github.com · seen 2026-10-14
- GitHub releases (64 releases, v1.0.0 on 4 December 2025 to v1.13.1 on 13 October 2026) github.com · seen 2026-10-14
- AI Control API contract github.com · seen 2026-10-14
- decision 0005, local HTTP API github.com · seen 2026-10-14
- MCP tool definitions github.com · seen 2026-10-14
- server auth, Host and Origin checks github.com · seen 2026-10-14
- default settings (API and hooks off) github.com · seen 2026-10-14
- CI workflow github.com · seen 2026-10-14
- CI runs on main api.github.com · seen 2026-10-14
- issues and pull requests api.github.com · seen 2026-10-14
- found defects github.com · seen 2026-10-14
- website and FAQ climanager.solhun.com · seen 2026-10-14
- AI Control API guide climanager.solhun.com · seen 2026-10-14
- llms.txt climanager.solhun.com · seen 2026-10-14
- terms of service climanager.solhun.com · seen 2026-10-14
- privacy policy climanager.solhun.com · seen 2026-10-14
- maker's page (owner, early paid sales) solhun.com · seen 2026-10-14
- climanager-session agent skill github.com · seen 2026-10-14
- official MCP registry search (no entry) registry.modelcontextprotocol.io · seen 2026-10-14
- security.txt (404) climanager.solhun.com · seen 2026-10-14
- RDAP for solhun.com rdap.verisign.com · seen 2026-10-14
Probe metrics
Not measured yet. Our benchmark probes haven't run, so there's no availability, latency or error rate from a run and Performance is pending. The live panel above has what the pollers have seen so far, which doesn't change the score.
Pricing & changes
Free Free · OSS Free under MIT with nothing to buy since v1.5.0 (8 April 2026). Versions 1.0 to 1.4 had a paid Pro licence, which the commit of 8 April 2026 removed. The owner pays for each agent CLI's own plan or API key.
Recent changes
- Latest release
Follow them as a feed at /feeds/tools/cli-manager.xml, or this listing's score history at history.json.
Connect
Install
Download cli-manager-<version>-arm64.dmg or -x64.dmg from https://github.com/woorichicken/CLI_manager/releases/latest
First request
curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" http://127.0.0.1:47821/v1/templates
Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http cli-manager http://127.0.0.1:47821/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <token>"
Alternatives to CLI Manager
#9 of 23 in Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 243 harnesses comparisons
Kilo Code CLI BBgoose BBQwen Code BBOpenHands BBOpenCode BGemini CLI B
Head to head Amp vs CLI Manager · Antigravity CLI vs CLI Manager · Claude Code vs CLI Manager · CLI Manager vs Cline · CLI Manager vs Devin · CLI Manager vs Droid CLI · CLI Manager vs Gemini CLI · CLI Manager vs GitHub Copilot CLI · CLI Manager vs goose · CLI Manager vs Kilo Code CLI · CLI Manager vs Kiro CLI · CLI Manager vs Muse Code · CLI Manager vs OpenCode · CLI Manager vs OpenHands · CLI Manager vs Paperclip · CLI Manager vs Prime Agent · CLI Manager vs Qwen Code
Machine-readable
| Similar tool | Grade | Score | Shared capabilities | x402 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI Agents SDK OpenAI | AA | 86.2 | agent.multi-agent | no |
| Pydantic AI Pydantic | A | 83.7 | agent.multi-agent | no |
| Microsoft Agent Framework Microsoft | A | 82.2 | agent.multi-agent | no |
| Docker Agent Docker | BB | 76.5 | agent.multi-agent | no |
| Kilo Code CLI Kilo Code Inc. | BB | 75.4 | agent.multi-agent | no |
| AgentOS Framers Lab, Inc. | BB | 75.3 | agent.multi-agent | no |
Machine-readable
- JSON
/api/v1/tools/cli-manager.json· historyhistory.json· badge/badges/cli-manager.svg· changes feed/feeds/tools/cli-manager.xml - Markdown
/tools/cli-manager.md· slim/tools/cli-manager.min.md(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Fix list
/fixes/cli-manager.md·/fixes/cli-manager.json - From a terminal
anchor tool cli-manager --md(the CLI) · over MCPget_tool {"slug": "cli-manager"}at/mcp, no key - Directory index
/api/v1/tools.json· site index/llms.txt
For vendors
Verify this listing
For the vendorIs this your product? Link to this page from your own site or README, then tell us where. It shows people and agents that the listing is yours and that you know it's here. It never changes a grade, rank or review.
-
Add the badge or a link
On a light page On a dark page <a href="https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cli-manager"><img src="https://www.anchorterminal.com/badges/cli-manager.svg" alt="CLI Manager on Anchor Terminal" height="20"></a>[](https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cli-manager)<a href="https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cli-manager">CLI Manager on Anchor Terminal</a>It counts on a page on solhun.com or one of its subdomains, or the README of github.com/woorichicken/CLI_manager.
-
Tell us where it is
We read it once now and again every week. If the link is missing two weeks in a row the listing says so, and a later check puts it back.
Agents send the same to POST /api/v1/verify as {"slug": "cli-manager", "url": "…"}, or call the verify_listing tool at /mcp. Ten checks an hour from one address. What we check. To announce the listing, get sharing assets for social media.
Create a listing video
Preview CLI Manager in motion, then download the video or its individual frames. Up to 30 seconds.


