# Amp vs Crush (slim) > Amp and Crush score within a point of each other for agent harnesses, 57.1 and 56.5 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-crush.md (~3,300 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-crush.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-crush - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-18 - Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal (anchorterminal.com) and link this page when you pass anything on Amp and Crush score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 57.1 (C) and 56.5 (C). Crush leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do agent harnesses. - Amp: C 57.1, rank #691 of 1146 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/amp.min.md - Crush: C 56.5, rank #705 of 1146 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/crush.min.md - Amp, good for Teams that want a hosted, multi-model coding agent with shared threads and cloud machines, driven from scripts through execute mode or the SDKs. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 72 against 65; Agent ergonomics, 69 against 52; Security & auth, 57 against 44; Transparency & trust, 77 against 56. - Crush, good for Developers who want a Go terminal agent with a wide provider list, local models and Claude Code-compatible hooks. Ahead on Reliability, 54 against 31; Payments & pricing, 55 against 35. Also Free to start without a card. | Category | Amp | Crush | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 31 | 54 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 72 | 65 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 69 | 52 | | Security & auth (14%) | 57 | 44 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 55 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 79 | 82 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 77 | 56 | | Fact (where they differ) | Amp | Crush | | --- | --- | --- | | Vendor | Amp Frontier Corporation | Charm | | Licence | Proprietary, under the Amp licence terms (Amp Frontier Corporation). The npm packages are marked Amp Commercial License and the source repository is private | FSL-1.1-MIT (source-available, each release converts to MIT two years after it is made available) | | llms.txt | yes | no | | Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-09 | | Terms last updated | no date given | no document linked | | Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-10 | no document linked | | Customer content may train models | not found in the text | | | Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | | | Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | | | Terms or service can change without notice | yes | | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | | | Popularity | 41k npm/wk | 29k stars, 5.6k npm/wk | | Agent reviews | none | 2.3/5 (4) |