Head to head · Web search · October 2026 research run
Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapingdog
Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E). Both do web search. The largest gap is security & auth, 62 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Firecrawl MCP for
- reliability (+8)
- schema & documentation (+45)
- agent ergonomics (+48)
- security & auth (+62)
- payments & pricing (+10)
- maintenance & community (+42)
- transparency & trust (+19)
Pick Scrapingdog for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Firecrawl MCP | Scrapingdog | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 62 | Firecrawl MCP +8 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 88 | 43 | Firecrawl MCP +45 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 92 | 44 | Firecrawl MCP +48 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 67 | 5 | Firecrawl MCP +62 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 40 | Firecrawl MCP +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 87 | 45 | Firecrawl MCP +42 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 76 | 57 | Firecrawl MCP +19 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | 75.5 · BB | 39.3 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Firecrawl MCP | Scrapingdog |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Firecrawl (Mendable) | Scrapingdog (OpenData Labs) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcp | https://api.scrapingdog.com/scrape |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | none |
| Tools exposed | 26 | 35 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-server | io.github.Darshan972/scrapingdog-mcp |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-07-31 |
| Popularity | 7.5k stars, 29k npm/wk | 0 stars, 41 npm/wk, 12 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (8) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Firecrawl MCP
Keyless hosted endpoint with scrape, search and parse, plus OAuth and a search-only endpoint. No x402 or other machine payment.
Scrapingdog
A plain request is 1 credit, about $0.20 per 1,000 on Lite. API key only travels in the URL query string.
Before you call either
Firecrawl MCP
- Use
firecrawl_mapto list URLs, then scrape the few you need instead of crawling a whole site - On the keyless endpoint only scrape, search and parse work. A 429 carries a
signup_urlfor the human - Ask for markdown only. JSON, question and highlight formats add 4 credits a page
- Poll
firecrawl_check_crawl_statusrather than waiting on a long crawl inside one call - Check the URL before scraping. Dead pages still cost a credit
Scrapingdog
- Add dynamic=false unless the page needs JavaScript. It cuts the cost from 5 credits to 1, whatever the MCP description says
- Keep request URLs out of logs, since they carry api_key
- Set client timeouts above 60 seconds and retry on 429 or timeout. Failures aren't billed
- Prefer the parsed endpoints (Google, Amazon) over scraping the raw page when one exists
Other comparisons with Firecrawl MCP or Scrapingdog
- Bright Data vs Scrapingdog
- Jina Reader vs Scrapingdog
- Olostep vs Scrapingdog
- Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapeless vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapfly vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingAnt vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingBee vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapingdog vs Spider
- Scrapingdog vs ZenRows
- Brave Search API + MCP vs Firecrawl MCP
- Bright Data vs Firecrawl MCP
- Exa API + MCP vs Firecrawl MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs Jina Reader
- Firecrawl MCP vs Linkup
- Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep
- Firecrawl MCP vs Parallel Search and Task APIs
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapeless
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingBee
- Firecrawl MCP vs SearchAPI.io
- Firecrawl MCP vs SerpApi
- Firecrawl MCP vs Serper
- Firecrawl MCP vs Spider
- Firecrawl MCP vs Tavily API + MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs Valyu
- Firecrawl MCP vs You.com APIs
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapfly
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingAnt
- Apify MCP Server vs Firecrawl MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs ZenRows
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/firecrawl-mcp.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapingdog.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapingdog.md