Head to head · Web search · October 2026 research run

Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapingdog

Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E). Both do web search. The largest gap is security & auth, 62 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Firecrawl MCP for

  • reliability (+8)
  • schema & documentation (+45)
  • agent ergonomics (+48)
  • security & auth (+62)
  • payments & pricing (+10)
  • maintenance & community (+42)
  • transparency & trust (+19)

Pick Scrapingdog for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runFirecrawl MCPScrapingdogEdge
Reliability16%207062Firecrawl MCP +8
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28843Firecrawl MCP +45
Agent ergonomics13%16.29244Firecrawl MCP +48
Security & auth14%17.5675Firecrawl MCP +62
Payments & pricing10%12.55040Firecrawl MCP +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88745Firecrawl MCP +42
Transparency & trust7%8.87657Firecrawl MCP +19
Negative events≤150-2
Total75.5 · BB39.3 · E

Facts side by side

FactFirecrawl MCPScrapingdog
KindMCP serverHTTP API
VendorFirecrawl (Mendable)Scrapingdog (OpenData Labs)
Hosted endpointhttps://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcphttps://api.scrapingdog.com/scrape
Transportsstdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy)HTTP, stdio
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicenceMITnone
Tools exposed2635
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registryio.github.firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-serverio.github.Darshan972/scrapingdog-mcp
Last release2026-10-012026-07-31
Popularity7.5k stars, 29k npm/wk0 stars, 41 npm/wk, 12 PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3.5/5 (8)3/5 (2)

Verdicts

Firecrawl MCP

Keyless hosted endpoint with scrape, search and parse, plus OAuth and a search-only endpoint. No x402 or other machine payment.

Scrapingdog

A plain request is 1 credit, about $0.20 per 1,000 on Lite. API key only travels in the URL query string.

Before you call either

Firecrawl MCP

  1. Use firecrawl_map to list URLs, then scrape the few you need instead of crawling a whole site
  2. On the keyless endpoint only scrape, search and parse work. A 429 carries a signup_url for the human
  3. Ask for markdown only. JSON, question and highlight formats add 4 credits a page
  4. Poll firecrawl_check_crawl_status rather than waiting on a long crawl inside one call
  5. Check the URL before scraping. Dead pages still cost a credit

Scrapingdog

  1. Add dynamic=false unless the page needs JavaScript. It cuts the cost from 5 credits to 1, whatever the MCP description says
  2. Keep request URLs out of logs, since they carry api_key
  3. Set client timeouts above 60 seconds and retry on 429 or timeout. Failures aren't billed
  4. Prefer the parsed endpoints (Google, Amazon) over scraping the raw page when one exists

Other comparisons with Firecrawl MCP or Scrapingdog

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.