Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
ScraperAPI vs Scrapingdog
ScraperAPI scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against Scrapingdog's 39.2 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Scrapingdog leads on reliability. Both do scraping.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 167 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Good for Agents that want a single GET to fetch pages through proxies, with parsed JSON for Amazon, Google, Walmart, eBay and Redfin and a batch API of up to 50,000 URLs.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 67 against 43
- Agent ergonomics, 74 against 44
- Security & auth, 29 against 5
- Maintenance & community, 61 against 45
Watch for
No status page is linked from the home, pricing, support or docs pages, although the pricing page lists a 99.9% uptime guarantee
Good for A budget agent that wants parsed Google, Amazon or LinkedIn results and can keep the key out of logs.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 62 against 45
Watch for
API key only travels in the URL query string
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | ScraperAPI | Scrapingdog | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 45 | 62 | Scrapingdog +17 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 67 | 43 | ScraperAPI +24 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 74 | 44 | ScraperAPI +30 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 29 | 5 | ScraperAPI +24 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 61 | 45 | ScraperAPI +16 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 54 | 55 | Scrapingdog +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | 52.1 · D | 39.2 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | ScraperAPI | Scrapingdog |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | ScraperAPI (saas.group) | Scrapingdog (OpenData Labs) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.scraperapi.com | https://api.scrapingdog.com/scrape |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Tools exposed | 28 | 35 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.Darshan972/scrapingdog-mcp |
| Last release | 2026-08-07 | 2026-07-31 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-01-13 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2025-07-17 |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 5 stars | 0 stars, 41 npm/wk, 12 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
ScraperAPI
One GET request with a key and a URL returns a page, and the MCP server's 28 tools carry read-only and destructive hints. No status page, OpenAPI file, security.txt or certification was found, and the documented default puts the API key in the URL query string.
Scrapingdog
A plain request is 1 credit, about $0.20 per 1,000 on Lite. API key only travels in the URL query string.
Before you call either
ScraperAPI
- Set the client timeout to 70 seconds. The API retries for that long before it returns 500, and a request cancelled earlier is still charged
- Send the key as the
x-sapi-api_keyheader to keep it out of URLs and logs - Pass
max_coston each request, or call/account/urlcostfirst, because domain and anti-bot surcharges vary from 1 to 75 credits - Use
output_format=markdownortextto cut response size, andautoparse=trueonly on supported domains - On 429 reduce concurrency to the plan limit (5 on Free, 20 on Hobby). The request is rejected, not queued
Scrapingdog
- Add dynamic=false unless the page needs JavaScript. It cuts the cost from 5 credits to 1, whatever the MCP description says
- Keep request URLs out of logs, since they carry api_key
- Set client timeouts above 60 seconds and retry on 429 or timeout. Failures aren't billed
- Prefer the parsed endpoints (Google, Amazon) over scraping the raw page when one exists
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, ScraperAPI or Scrapingdog?
ScraperAPI scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against Scrapingdog's 39.2 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Scrapingdog leads on reliability.
Do ScraperAPI and Scrapingdog need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call ScraperAPI and Scrapingdog without installing anything?
Yes. ScraperAPI has a hosted endpoint at https://api.scraperapi.com and Scrapingdog at https://api.scrapingdog.com/scrape.
Other comparisons with ScraperAPI or Scrapingdog
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapingdog
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrapingdog
- Bright Data vs ScraperAPI
- Bright Data vs Scrapingdog
- Jina Reader vs ScraperAPI
- Jina Reader vs Scrapingdog
- Olostep vs ScraperAPI
- Olostep vs Scrapingdog
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScraperAPI
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrapingdog
- Scrape.do vs ScraperAPI
- Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ScraperAPI
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapeless vs ScraperAPI
- Scrapeless vs Scrapingdog
- ScraperAPI vs Scrapfly
- ScraperAPI vs ScrapingAnt
- ScraperAPI vs ScrapingBee
- ScraperAPI vs Spider
- ScraperAPI vs ZenRows
- ScraperAPI vs Zyte API
- Scrapfly vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingAnt vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingBee vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapingdog vs Spider
- Scrapingdog vs ZenRows
- Scrapingdog vs Zyte API
- Diffbot vs ScraperAPI
- Diffbot vs Scrapingdog
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScraperAPI
- Apify MCP Server vs ScraperAPI
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/scraperapi-vs-scrapingdog.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/scraperapi.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapingdog.json - From a terminal
anchor compare scraperapi scrapingdog(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "scraperapi", "b": "scrapingdog"}at/mcp, no key