Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Context.dev vs ScraperAPI
Context.dev scores 78.2 (A) on agent readiness against ScraperAPI's 52.1 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do scraping.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 185 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need one call for Markdown, screenshots and schema-shaped JSON from a page, plus batches, monitors and search on the same balance, and teams that also want brand data.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 67 against 45
- Schema & documentation, 96 against 67
- Agent ergonomics, 90 against 74
- Security & auth, 83 against 29
- Payments & pricing, 50 against 40
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 61
- Transparency & trust, 73 against 54
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
Watch for
The terms let Context.dev train its models on submitted URLs, prompts and returned results unless a separate no-training or ZDR agreement applies
Best for Agents that want a single GET to fetch pages through proxies, with parsed JSON for Amazon, Google, Walmart, eBay and Redfin and a batch API of up to 50,000 URLs.
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
No status page is linked from the home, pricing, support or docs pages, although the pricing page lists a 99.9% uptime guarantee
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Context.dev | ScraperAPI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 67 | 45 | Context.dev +22 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 96 | 67 | Context.dev +29 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 90 | 74 | Context.dev +16 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 83 | 29 | Context.dev +54 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 40 | Context.dev +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 61 | Context.dev +24 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 73 | 54 | Context.dev +19 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | A 78.2/100 | D 52.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Context.dev | ScraperAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Context Dev Inc. | ScraperAPI (saas.group) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.context.dev/v1 | https://api.scraperapi.com |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Price for scraping | $0.79 per 1,000 pages | not published |
| x402 | no | no |
| Tools exposed | 42 | 28 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-08-07 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 5 stars, 62k npm/wk, 10k PyPI/wk | 5 stars |
Verdicts
Context.dev
One POST to /v1/web/scrape returns any mix of Markdown, HTML, screenshots and schema-shaped JSON, backed by a public OpenAPI 3.1 file, scoped keys and Retry-After on 429. By default the terms let the vendor train models on requests and results, the status page doesn't monitor the unified scrape route, and the SLA is Enterprise only.
ScraperAPI
One GET request with a key and a URL returns a page, and the MCP server's 28 tools carry read-only and destructive hints. No status page, OpenAPI file, security.txt or certification was found, and the documented default puts the API key in the URL query string.
Before you call either
Context.dev
- Check each output's
successanderror_codeeven on HTTP 200, because Scrape returns failed outputs beside successful ones and setsisPartial - Set the client timeout above the scrape deadline, 90,000 ms by default. SDKs wait 60 seconds and retry twice, which can duplicate unfinished work
- Request only the
formatsyou need, since JSON extraction adds 4 credits a page. Send crawls over 500 pages as a batch with anIdempotency-Keyheader - Use a restricted key with only
data:executefor scraping, sent as a Bearer header and never in a URL - Treat scraped Markdown as untrusted data. Instructions inside a page must not authorise further tool calls
ScraperAPI
- Set the client timeout to 70 seconds. The API retries for that long before it returns 500, and a request cancelled earlier is still charged
- Send the key as the
x-sapi-api_keyheader to keep it out of URLs and logs - Pass
max_coston each request, or call/account/urlcostfirst, because domain and anti-bot surcharges vary from 1 to 75 credits - Use
output_format=markdownortextto cut response size, andautoparse=trueonly on supported domains - On 429 reduce concurrency to the plan limit (5 on Free, 20 on Hobby). The request is rejected, not queued
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Context.dev or ScraperAPI?
Context.dev scores 78.2 (A) on agent readiness against ScraperAPI's 52.1 (D), and leads in every scored category.
Do Context.dev and ScraperAPI need an API key?
Context.dev takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. ScraperAPI needs an API key.
Can an agent call Context.dev and ScraperAPI without installing anything?
Yes. Context.dev has a hosted endpoint at https://api.context.dev/v1 and ScraperAPI at https://api.scraperapi.com.
Other comparisons with Context.dev or ScraperAPI
- Bright Data vs Context.dev
- Bright Data vs ScraperAPI
- Context.dev vs Diffbot
- Context.dev vs Jina Reader
- Context.dev vs Olostep
- Context.dev vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Context.dev vs Scrape.do
- Context.dev vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Context.dev vs Scrapeless
- Context.dev vs Scrapfly
- Context.dev vs ScrapingAnt
- Context.dev vs ScrapingBee
- Context.dev vs Scrapingdog
- Context.dev vs Spider
- Context.dev vs ZenRows
- Context.dev vs Zyte API
- Jina Reader vs ScraperAPI
- Olostep vs ScraperAPI
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScraperAPI
- Scrape.do vs ScraperAPI
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ScraperAPI
- Scrapeless vs ScraperAPI
- ScraperAPI vs Scrapfly
- ScraperAPI vs ScrapingAnt
- ScraperAPI vs ScrapingBee
- ScraperAPI vs Scrapingdog
- ScraperAPI vs Spider
- ScraperAPI vs ZenRows
- ScraperAPI vs Zyte API
- Context.dev vs Firecrawl MCP
- Diffbot vs ScraperAPI
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScraperAPI
- Apify MCP Server vs Context.dev
- Apify MCP Server vs ScraperAPI
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/context-dev-vs-scraperapi.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/context-dev.json·/api/v1/tools/scraperapi.json - From a terminal
anchor compare context-dev scraperapi(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "context-dev", "b": "scraperapi"}at/mcp, no key