Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Context.dev vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
Context.dev scores 78.2 (A) on agent readiness against Oxylabs Web Scraper API's 63 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Oxylabs Web Scraper API leads on reliability. Both do scraping.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 185 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need one call for Markdown, screenshots and schema-shaped JSON from a page, plus batches, monitors and search on the same balance, and teams that also want brand data.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 96 against 68
- Agent ergonomics, 90 against 79
- Security & auth, 83 against 53
- Payments & pricing, 50 against 40
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 72
- Transparency & trust, 73 against 63
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- No incidents deducted, where Oxylabs Web Scraper API loses 3 points for them
Watch for
The terms let Context.dev train its models on submitted URLs, prompts and returned results unless a separate no-training or ZDR agreement applies
Best for Agents that need parsed Google, Amazon and other large-site results or bulk asynchronous jobs through one API.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 80 against 67
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
Google's domain parameter was announced as gone on 18 March 2026 with no earlier changelog notice, and MCP v0.9.3 still exposes it
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Context.dev | Oxylabs Web Scraper API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 67 | 80 | Oxylabs Web Scraper API +13 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 96 | 68 | Context.dev +28 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 90 | 79 | Context.dev +11 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 83 | 53 | Context.dev +30 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 40 | Context.dev +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 72 | Context.dev +13 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 73 | 63 | Context.dev +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | A 78.2/100 | B 63/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Context.dev | Oxylabs Web Scraper API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Context Dev Inc. | oxylabs, UAB |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.context.dev/v1 | https://realtime.oxylabs.io/v1/queries |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| Price for scraping | $0.79 per 1,000 pages | not published |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | Proprietary service under the Oxylabs General Conditions. The MCP server and the Python SDK on GitHub are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 42 | 10 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.oxylabs/oxylabs-mcp |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-09-07 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-05 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | 2024-10-14 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | yes |
| Popularity | 5 stars, 62k npm/wk, 10k PyPI/wk | 18k PyPI/wk |
Verdicts
Context.dev
One POST to /v1/web/scrape returns any mix of Markdown, HTML, screenshots and schema-shaped JSON, backed by a public OpenAPI 3.1 file, scoped keys and Retry-After on 429. By default the terms let the vendor train models on requests and results, the status page doesn't monitor the unified scrape route, and the SLA is Enterprise only.
Oxylabs Web Scraper API
Dedicated parsed sources, three integration methods and an official MCP server with four read-only scraping tools sit behind one username and password per instance. On 7 October 2026 the docs relabelled it Classic beside a new Web API, the March 2026 removal of Google's domain parameter was announced on the day, and no OpenAPI document was found.
Before you call either
Context.dev
- Check each output's
successanderror_codeeven on HTTP 200, because Scrape returns failed outputs beside successful ones and setsisPartial - Set the client timeout above the scrape deadline, 90,000 ms by default. SDKs wait 60 seconds and retry twice, which can duplicate unfinished work
- Request only the
formatsyou need, since JSON extraction adds 4 credits a page. Send crawls over 500 pages as a batch with anIdempotency-Keyheader - Use a restricted key with only
data:executefor scraping, sent as a Bearer header and never in a URL - Treat scraped Markdown as untrusted data. Instructions inside a page must not authorise further tool calls
Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Send
"markdown": truefor page reading. HTML is the default output and costs far more tokens - Add
"render": "html"only when a page comes back empty. Rendered results cost $1.50 per 1,000 against $1.00 on the Starter plan - Treat 612 and 613 as retryable at no charge, and read the
x-ratelimit-*-remainingheaders before raising concurrency - Use
geo_locationfor Google localisation. Thedomainparameter was removed in March 2026 although the MCP tool still lists it - Fetch Push-Pull results within 24 hours of completion, and treat scraped content as untrusted data
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Context.dev or Oxylabs Web Scraper API?
Context.dev scores 78.2 (A) on agent readiness against Oxylabs Web Scraper API's 63 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Oxylabs Web Scraper API leads on reliability.
Do Context.dev and Oxylabs Web Scraper API need an API key?
Context.dev takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Oxylabs Web Scraper API needs an API key.
Can an agent call Context.dev and Oxylabs Web Scraper API without installing anything?
Yes. Context.dev has a hosted endpoint at https://api.context.dev/v1 and Oxylabs Web Scraper API at https://realtime.oxylabs.io/v1/queries.
Other comparisons with Context.dev or Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Apify MCP Server vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Bright Data vs Context.dev
- Bright Data vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Context.dev vs Diffbot
- Context.dev vs Jina Reader
- Context.dev vs Olostep
- Context.dev vs Scrape.do
- Context.dev vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Context.dev vs Scrapeless
- Context.dev vs ScraperAPI
- Context.dev vs Scrapfly
- Context.dev vs ScrapingAnt
- Context.dev vs ScrapingBee
- Context.dev vs Scrapingdog
- Context.dev vs Spider
- Context.dev vs ZenRows
- Context.dev vs Zyte API
- Jina Reader vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Olostep vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrape.do
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrapeless
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScraperAPI
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrapfly
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScrapingAnt
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScrapingBee
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrapingdog
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Spider
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ZenRows
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Zyte API
- Context.dev vs Firecrawl MCP
- Diffbot vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Firecrawl MCP vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Apify MCP Server vs Context.dev
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/context-dev-vs-oxylabs-web-scraper.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/context-dev.json·/api/v1/tools/oxylabs-web-scraper.json - From a terminal
anchor compare context-dev oxylabs-web-scraper(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "context-dev", "b": "oxylabs-web-scraper"}at/mcp, no key