Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Context.dev vs Jina Reader
Context.dev scores 78.2 (A) on agent readiness against Jina Reader's 45.1 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do scraping.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 185 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need one call for Markdown, screenshots and schema-shaped JSON from a page, plus batches, monitors and search on the same balance, and teams that also want brand data.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 67 against 60
- Schema & documentation, 96 against 43
- Agent ergonomics, 90 against 76
- Security & auth, 83 against 32
- Payments & pricing, 50 against 35
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 65
- Transparency & trust, 73 against 58
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Free to start without a card
- No incidents deducted, where Jina Reader loses 7 points for them
Watch for
The terms let Context.dev train its models on submitted URLs, prompts and returned results unless a separate no-training or ZDR agreement applies
Best for Agents that read the web a page at a time and want to bound the tokens.
Also in its favour
- Open source
Watch for
No price per token in any currency on the public page
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Context.dev | Jina Reader | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 67 | 60 | Context.dev +7 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 96 | 43 | Context.dev +53 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 90 | 76 | Context.dev +14 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 83 | 32 | Context.dev +51 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 35 | Context.dev +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 65 | Context.dev +20 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 73 | 58 | Context.dev +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -7 | |
| Total | A 78.2/100 | E 45.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Context.dev | Jina Reader |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Context Dev Inc. | Jina AI (Elastic) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.context.dev/v1 | https://r.jina.ai/ |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| Price for scraping | $0.79 per 1,000 pages | not published |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | 42 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-09-18 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 | 2026-05-04 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | 2026-09-07 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 5 stars, 62k npm/wk, 10k PyPI/wk | 12k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Context.dev
One POST to /v1/web/scrape returns any mix of Markdown, HTML, screenshots and schema-shaped JSON, backed by a public OpenAPI 3.1 file, scoped keys and Retry-After on 429. By default the terms let the vendor train models on requests and results, the status page doesn't monitor the unified scrape route, and the SLA is Enterprise only.
Jina Reader
One URL prefix, no key needed, Markdown back. No price per token in any currency on the public page.
Before you call either
Context.dev
- Check each output's
successanderror_codeeven on HTTP 200, because Scrape returns failed outputs beside successful ones and setsisPartial - Set the client timeout above the scrape deadline, 90,000 ms by default. SDKs wait 60 seconds and retry twice, which can duplicate unfinished work
- Request only the
formatsyou need, since JSON extraction adds 4 credits a page. Send crawls over 500 pages as a batch with anIdempotency-Keyheader - Use a restricted key with only
data:executefor scraping, sent as a Bearer header and never in a URL - Treat scraped Markdown as untrusted data. Instructions inside a page must not authorise further tool calls
Jina Reader
- Prefix the URL,
https://r.jina.ai/https://example.com, and read the Markdown - Send
x-max-tokensto cap a page, orx-token-budgetto refuse one that's too big - Use
x-target-selectorwhen you need one part of a page - Keyless is 20 requests a minute and can't search. Add a key for loops or s.jina.ai
- Send
x-no-cache: truewhen a page may have changed or a blocked response got cached
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Context.dev or Jina Reader?
Context.dev scores 78.2 (A) on agent readiness against Jina Reader's 45.1 (E), and leads in every scored category.
Do Context.dev and Jina Reader need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Context.dev and Jina Reader without installing anything?
Yes. Context.dev has a hosted endpoint at https://api.context.dev/v1 and Jina Reader at https://r.jina.ai/.
Are Context.dev and Jina Reader open source?
No open-source release is listed for Context.dev. Jina Reader is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Context.dev or Jina Reader
- Apify MCP Server vs Jina Reader
- Bright Data vs Context.dev
- Bright Data vs Jina Reader
- Context.dev vs Diffbot
- Context.dev vs Olostep
- Context.dev vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Context.dev vs Scrape.do
- Context.dev vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Context.dev vs Scrapeless
- Context.dev vs ScraperAPI
- Context.dev vs Scrapfly
- Context.dev vs ScrapingAnt
- Context.dev vs ScrapingBee
- Context.dev vs Scrapingdog
- Context.dev vs Spider
- Context.dev vs ZenRows
- Context.dev vs Zyte API
- Diffbot vs Jina Reader
- Jina Reader vs Olostep
- Jina Reader vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Jina Reader vs Scrape.do
- Jina Reader vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Jina Reader vs Scrapeless
- Jina Reader vs ScraperAPI
- Jina Reader vs Scrapfly
- Jina Reader vs ScrapingAnt
- Jina Reader vs ScrapingBee
- Jina Reader vs Scrapingdog
- Jina Reader vs Spider
- Jina Reader vs ZenRows
- Jina Reader vs Zyte API
- Context.dev vs Firecrawl MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs Jina Reader
- Apify MCP Server vs Context.dev
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/context-dev-vs-jina-reader.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/context-dev.json·/api/v1/tools/jina-reader.json - From a terminal
anchor compare context-dev jina-reader(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "context-dev", "b": "jina-reader"}at/mcp, no key