Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Context.dev vs ScrapingBee
Context.dev scores 78.2 (A) on agent readiness against ScrapingBee's 59.2 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do scraping.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 185 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need one call for Markdown, screenshots and schema-shaped JSON from a page, plus batches, monitors and search on the same balance, and teams that also want brand data.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 96 against 60
- Agent ergonomics, 90 against 68
- Security & auth, 83 against 37
- Payments & pricing, 50 against 40
- Transparency & trust, 73 against 63
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
Watch for
The terms let Context.dev train its models on submitted URLs, prompts and returned results unless a separate no-training or ZDR agreement applies
Best for Agents that mix general scraping with ready-made Google, Amazon and YouTube endpoints and want spend capped per call.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
remote-mcp.txt says the hosted MCP only takes the key as ?api_key= in its URL
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Context.dev | ScrapingBee | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 67 | 70 | ScrapingBee +3 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 96 | 60 | Context.dev +36 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 90 | 68 | Context.dev +22 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 83 | 37 | Context.dev +46 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 40 | Context.dev +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 73 | 63 | Context.dev +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | A 78.2/100 | C 59.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Context.dev | ScrapingBee |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Context Dev Inc. | ScrapingBee (Oxylabs group) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.context.dev/v1 | https://app.scrapingbee.com/api/v1/ |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Price for scraping | $0.79 per 1,000 pages | not published |
| x402 | no | no |
| Tools exposed | 42 | 18 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-09-11 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 | 2024-07-15 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | 2024-07-15 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 5 stars, 62k npm/wk, 10k PyPI/wk | 132 stars, 49k npm/wk, 72k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 4/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Context.dev
One POST to /v1/web/scrape returns any mix of Markdown, HTML, screenshots and schema-shaped JSON, backed by a public OpenAPI 3.1 file, scoped keys and Retry-After on 429. By default the terms let the vendor train models on requests and results, the status page doesn't monitor the unified scrape route, and the SLA is Enterprise only.
ScrapingBee
Dedicated Google, Amazon, Walmart, YouTube, ChatGPT and Gemini endpoints next to the general HTML API. remote-mcp.txt says the hosted MCP only takes the key as ?api_key= in its URL.
Before you call either
Context.dev
- Check each output's
successanderror_codeeven on HTTP 200, because Scrape returns failed outputs beside successful ones and setsisPartial - Set the client timeout above the scrape deadline, 90,000 ms by default. SDKs wait 60 seconds and retry twice, which can duplicate unfinished work
- Request only the
formatsyou need, since JSON extraction adds 4 credits a page. Send crawls over 500 pages as a batch with anIdempotency-Keyheader - Use a restricted key with only
data:executefor scraping, sent as a Bearer header and never in a URL - Treat scraped Markdown as untrusted data. Instructions inside a page must not authorise further tool calls
ScrapingBee
- Send render_js=false for static pages and files. It cuts the cost from 5 credits to 1
- Use mode=auto with max_cost=25 to stop it escalating to 75-credit stealth requests
- Keep the MCP URL with ?api_key= out of logs and shared configs
- Back off exponentially on 429 from the MCP, since its concurrency is shared across customers
- Expect 404 and 410 from the target to be billed. Other failures aren't
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Context.dev or ScrapingBee?
Context.dev scores 78.2 (A) on agent readiness against ScrapingBee's 59.2 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.
Do Context.dev and ScrapingBee need an API key?
Context.dev takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. ScrapingBee needs an API key.
Can an agent call Context.dev and ScrapingBee without installing anything?
Yes. Context.dev has a hosted endpoint at https://api.context.dev/v1 and ScrapingBee at https://app.scrapingbee.com/api/v1/.
Other comparisons with Context.dev or ScrapingBee
- Apify MCP Server vs ScrapingBee
- Bright Data vs Context.dev
- Bright Data vs ScrapingBee
- Context.dev vs Diffbot
- Context.dev vs Jina Reader
- Context.dev vs Olostep
- Context.dev vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Context.dev vs Scrape.do
- Context.dev vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Context.dev vs Scrapeless
- Context.dev vs ScraperAPI
- Context.dev vs Scrapfly
- Context.dev vs ScrapingAnt
- Context.dev vs Scrapingdog
- Context.dev vs Spider
- Context.dev vs ZenRows
- Context.dev vs Zyte API
- Jina Reader vs ScrapingBee
- Olostep vs ScrapingBee
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScrapingBee
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapeless vs ScrapingBee
- ScraperAPI vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapfly vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapingAnt vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapingBee vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingBee vs Spider
- ScrapingBee vs ZenRows
- ScrapingBee vs Zyte API
- Context.dev vs Firecrawl MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingBee
- Diffbot vs ScrapingBee
- Apify MCP Server vs Context.dev
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/context-dev-vs-scrapingbee.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/context-dev.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapingbee.json - From a terminal
anchor compare context-dev scrapingbee(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "context-dev", "b": "scrapingbee"}at/mcp, no key