Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
ScrapingBee vs Scrapingdog
ScrapingBee has a score of 59.3 (C) against Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E). Both do scraping. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 40 points.
Which one, for what
Pick ScrapingBee for
- reliability (+8)
- schema & documentation (+17)
- agent ergonomics (+24)
- security & auth (+32)
- maintenance & community (+40)
- transparency & trust (+7)
Pick Scrapingdog for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | ScrapingBee | Scrapingdog | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 62 | ScrapingBee +8 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 60 | 43 | ScrapingBee +17 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 68 | 44 | ScrapingBee +24 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 37 | 5 | ScrapingBee +32 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 45 | ScrapingBee +40 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 64 | 57 | ScrapingBee +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | 59.3 · C | 39.3 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | ScrapingBee | Scrapingdog |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | ScrapingBee (Oxylabs group) | Scrapingdog (OpenData Labs) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://app.scrapingbee.com/api/v1/ | https://api.scrapingdog.com/scrape |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | none |
| Tools exposed | 18 | 35 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.Darshan972/scrapingdog-mcp |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-07-31 |
| Popularity | 132 stars, 49k npm/wk, 72k PyPI/wk | 0 stars, 41 npm/wk, 12 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 4/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
ScrapingBee
Dedicated Google, Amazon, Walmart, YouTube, ChatGPT and Gemini endpoints next to the general HTML API. remote-mcp.txt says the hosted MCP only takes the key as ?api_key= in its URL.
Scrapingdog
A plain request is 1 credit, about $0.20 per 1,000 on Lite. API key only travels in the URL query string.
Before you call either
ScrapingBee
- Send render_js=false for static pages and files. It cuts the cost from 5 credits to 1
- Use mode=auto with max_cost=25 to stop it escalating to 75-credit stealth requests
- Keep the MCP URL with ?api_key= out of logs and shared configs
- Back off exponentially on 429 from the MCP, since its concurrency is shared across customers
- Expect 404 and 410 from the target to be billed. Other failures aren't
Scrapingdog
- Add dynamic=false unless the page needs JavaScript. It cuts the cost from 5 credits to 1, whatever the MCP description says
- Keep request URLs out of logs, since they carry api_key
- Set client timeouts above 60 seconds and retry on 429 or timeout. Failures aren't billed
- Prefer the parsed endpoints (Google, Amazon) over scraping the raw page when one exists
Other comparisons with ScrapingBee or Scrapingdog
- Bright Data vs ScrapingBee
- Bright Data vs Scrapingdog
- Jina Reader vs ScrapingBee
- Jina Reader vs Scrapingdog
- Olostep vs ScrapingBee
- Olostep vs Scrapingdog
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingBee
- Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapeless vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapeless vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapfly vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapfly vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingAnt vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapingAnt vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingBee vs Spider
- ScrapingBee vs ZenRows
- Scrapingdog vs Spider
- Scrapingdog vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingBee
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapingdog
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/scrapingbee.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapingdog.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/scrapingbee-vs-scrapingdog.md