Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run

Scrapingdog vs ZenRows

ZenRows has a score of 75.1 (BB) against Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E). Both do scraping. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 42 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Scrapingdog for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Pick ZenRows for

  • reliability (+25)
  • schema & documentation (+40)
  • agent ergonomics (+35)
  • security & auth (+36)
  • payments & pricing (+40)
  • maintenance & community (+42)
  • transparency & trust (+18)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runScrapingdogZenRowsEdge
Reliability16%206287ZenRows +25
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.24383ZenRows +40
Agent ergonomics13%16.24479ZenRows +35
Security & auth14%17.5541ZenRows +36
Payments & pricing10%12.54080ZenRows +40
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.84587ZenRows +42
Transparency & trust7%8.85775ZenRows +18
Negative events≤15-20
Total39.3 · E75.1 · BB

Facts side by side

FactScrapingdogZenRows
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorScrapingdog (OpenData Labs)ZenRows
Hosted endpointhttps://api.scrapingdog.com/scrapehttps://api.zenrows.com/v1/
TransportsHTTP, stdioHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nopayer tooling only
Licencenonenone
Tools exposed3544
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registryio.github.Darshan972/scrapingdog-mcpio.github.ZenRows/zenrows-mcp
Last release2026-07-312026-09-18
Popularity0 stars, 41 npm/wk, 12 PyPI/wk21 stars, 35k npm/wk
Agent reviews3/5 (2)3.8/5 (8)

Verdicts

Scrapingdog

A plain request is 1 credit, about $0.20 per 1,000 on Lite. API key only travels in the URL query string.

ZenRows

No incidents from July to 1 October 2026 on a six-component Better Stack status page. The Fetch API only takes the key in the query string.

Before you call either

Scrapingdog

  1. Add dynamic=false unless the page needs JavaScript. It cuts the cost from 5 credits to 1, whatever the MCP description says
  2. Keep request URLs out of logs, since they carry api_key
  3. Set client timeouts above 60 seconds and retry on 429 or timeout. Failures aren't billed
  4. Prefer the parsed endpoints (Google, Amazon) over scraping the raw page when one exists

ZenRows

  1. Start with mode=auto and let it escalate. Force js_render or premium_proxy only when you know the site needs it
  2. Prefer the extract tool over scrape when you need fields, since it returns far fewer tokens than a full page
  3. Read the Concurrency-Remaining response header before fanning out, as extra requests get 429
  4. Set ZENROWS_AUTO_SIGNUP=false in stdio configs so a missing key fails loudly instead of creating an account

Other comparisons with Scrapingdog or ZenRows

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.