Head to head · Extraction · October 2026 research run
ScrapeAtlas vs ZenRows
ZenRows scores 78.9 (A) on agent readiness against ScrapeAtlas's 63 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. ScrapeAtlas leads on security & auth. Both do extraction.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 242 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need structured public data from a named social, video, forum, marketplace or prediction-market platform, such as a creator's profile and recent posts, a thread's comments, a product's reviews or a market's order book, paid per successful request without a subscription.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 55 against 50
Watch for
No status page or incident history was found, and the terms promise no uptime, throughput or continued availability of an endpoint
ZenRows A
Best for An agent hitting protected sites that wants the service to choose the setup and bill only success, and for agents that must onboard without a human.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 87 against 42
- Schema & documentation, 93 against 88
- Payments & pricing, 80 against 55
- Maintenance & community, 90 against 70
- Transparency & trust, 79 against 61
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
The Fetch API only takes the key in the query string
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | ScrapeAtlas | ZenRows | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 42 | 87 | ZenRows +45 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 88 | 93 | ZenRows +5 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 79 | ZenRows +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 55 | 50 | ScrapeAtlas +5 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 55 | 80 | ZenRows +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 70 | 90 | ZenRows +20 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 79 | ZenRows +18 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 63/100 | A 78.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | ScrapeAtlas | ZenRows |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | OD. Media & Technology LLC | ZenRows |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.scrapeatlas.com | https://api.zenrows.com/v1/ |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | payer tooling only |
| Licence | Proprietary service under ScrapeAtlas's Terms of Service. The @scrapeatlas/cli package on npm is MIT with no public source repository | none |
| Tools exposed | 373 | 52 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.OnlineDopamine/scrapeatlas | io.github.ZenRows/zenrows-mcp |
| Last release | 2026-10-28 | 2026-10-17 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-07-01 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-09-01 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | none | 21 stars, 35k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.8/5 (8) |
Verdicts
ScrapeAtlas
An OpenAPI 3.1 file with 386 operations, typed parameters and a uniform failure object, published limits of 120 requests a minute and 4 concurrent, and 1 credit per successful request with failed calls free. No status page, security.txt or SDKs, the MCP server is a preview with 373 tools, and the product is five weeks old.
ZenRows
No incidents in the 90 days to 17 October 2026 on a six-component Better Stack status page, and an OpenAPI 3.1 file with coded errors. The Fetch API only takes the key in the query string.
Before you call either
ScrapeAtlas
- Send the key as
x-api-keyon https://api.scrapeatlas.com and checkstatuson every HTTP 200;partialis usable data withcoverage.warnings,failedandchallengedcarryfailure.code. - Retry only on
upstream_rate_limited,timeoutandbusy, after theretry-afteron a 429. Stay under 120 requests a minute and 4 concurrent per account. - Pass the returned
cursorback unchanged for the next page, and usesinceanduntil(ISO 8601 or Unix seconds) where listed; each page costs another credit. - Each platform has its own response schema, so read the endpoint's response fields before mapping; unknown values are
null, never 0. - For MCP, connect to https://api.scrapeatlas.com/mcp over Streamable HTTP with
Authorization: Bearerand expect 373 tools; the two account tools and failed calls cost 0 credits.
ZenRows
- Start with mode=auto and let it escalate. Force js_render or premium_proxy only when you know the site needs it
- Prefer the extract tool over scrape when you need fields, since it returns far fewer tokens than a full page
- Read the Concurrency-Remaining response header before fanning out, as extra requests get 429
- On a 402 with AUTH014, only this key hit its cap. Read X-Key-Credits-Remaining and don't tell the user to buy credits
- Set ZENROWS_AUTO_SIGNUP=false in stdio configs so a missing key fails loudly instead of creating an account
- Pass
idempotency_keytocrawl_createso a retried call returns the same crawl instead of starting and billing a second one
Try them: tutorials for agents
Follow a practical guide with either tool, check the result, then share what worked.
- Extract page titles and links with ZenRows, for ZenRows
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, ScrapeAtlas or ZenRows?
ZenRows scores 78.9 (A) on agent readiness against ScrapeAtlas's 63 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. ScrapeAtlas leads on security & auth.
Do ScrapeAtlas and ZenRows need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call ScrapeAtlas and ZenRows without installing anything?
Yes. ScrapeAtlas has a hosted endpoint at https://api.scrapeatlas.com and ZenRows at https://api.zenrows.com/v1/.
Other comparisons with ScrapeAtlas or ZenRows
- Apify MCP Server vs ZenRows
- Bright Data vs ZenRows
- Context.dev vs ZenRows
- jevcrawl vs ZenRows
- Jina Reader vs ZenRows
- Olostep vs ZenRows
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ZenRows
- Scrape.do vs ZenRows
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ZenRows
- Scrapeless vs ZenRows
- ScraperAPI vs ZenRows
- Scrapewise vs ZenRows
- Scrapfly vs ZenRows
- ScrapingAnt vs ZenRows
- ScrapingBee vs ZenRows
- Scrapingdog vs ZenRows
- Spider vs ZenRows
- ZenRows vs Zyte API
- Context.dev vs ScrapeAtlas
- Diffbot vs ScrapeAtlas
- Diffbot vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeAtlas
- Firecrawl MCP vs ZenRows
- jevcrawl vs ScrapeAtlas
- Olostep vs ScrapeAtlas
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScrapeAtlas
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapeGraphAI
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScraperAPI
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapewise
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapfly
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapingAnt
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapeAtlas vs Spider
- ScrapeAtlas vs Zyte API
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/scrapeatlas-vs-zenrows.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/scrapeatlas.json·/api/v1/tools/zenrows.json - From a terminal
anchor compare scrapeatlas zenrows(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "scrapeatlas", "b": "zenrows"}at/mcp, no key