Head to head · Extraction · October 2026 research run
ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapewise
ScrapeAtlas and Scrapewise score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 63 (B) and 62.6 (B). Scrapewise leads on agent ergonomics and maintenance & community. Both do extraction.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 242 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need structured public data from a named social, video, forum, marketplace or prediction-market platform, such as a creator's profile and recent posts, a thread's comments, a product's reviews or a market's order book, paid per successful request without a subscription.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 88 against 79
- Payments & pricing, 55 against 40
- Transparency & trust, 61 against 54
Watch for
No status page or incident history was found, and the terms promise no uptime, throughput or continued availability of an endpoint
Best for Agents that need e-commerce prices, Amazon and Google data, or recurring price monitoring with cleaning and product matching, paid per page in euros.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 86 against 76
- Maintenance & community, 79 against 70
Watch for
No status page, SLA, security.txt, disclosure policy or certification found
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | ScrapeAtlas | Scrapewise | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 42 | 45 | Scrapewise +3 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 88 | 79 | ScrapeAtlas +9 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 86 | Scrapewise +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 55 | 58 | Scrapewise +3 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 55 | 40 | ScrapeAtlas +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 70 | 79 | Scrapewise +9 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 54 | ScrapeAtlas +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 63/100 | B 62.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | ScrapeAtlas | Scrapewise |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | OD. Media & Technology LLC | BEBOTECH OÜ |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.scrapeatlas.com | https://mcp.scrapewise.ai/mcp |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under ScrapeAtlas's Terms of Service. The @scrapeatlas/cli package on npm is MIT with no public source repository | none |
| Tools exposed | 373 | 14 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.OnlineDopamine/scrapeatlas | ai.scrapewise/scrapewise |
| Last release | 2026-10-28 | 2026-10-15 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-10-29 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-10-29 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | none | 1 stars, 30 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
ScrapeAtlas
An OpenAPI 3.1 file with 386 operations, typed parameters and a uniform failure object, published limits of 120 requests a minute and 4 concurrent, and 1 credit per successful request with failed calls free. No status page, security.txt or SDKs, the MCP server is a preview with 373 tools, and the product is five weeks old.
Scrapewise
Agents get 14 priced MCP tools by default, each with a free quote_only price check and idempotency keys, read-only or full-access keys, and public euro prices from €0.15 per 1,000 plain pages. There is no status page, SLA or vulnerability disclosure policy, and the terms claim ownership of all scraped data under a perpetual licence.
Before you call either
ScrapeAtlas
- Send the key as
x-api-keyon https://api.scrapeatlas.com and checkstatuson every HTTP 200;partialis usable data withcoverage.warnings,failedandchallengedcarryfailure.code. - Retry only on
upstream_rate_limited,timeoutandbusy, after theretry-afteron a 429. Stay under 120 requests a minute and 4 concurrent per account. - Pass the returned
cursorback unchanged for the next page, and usesinceanduntil(ISO 8601 or Unix seconds) where listed; each page costs another credit. - Each platform has its own response schema, so read the endpoint's response fields before mapping; unknown values are
null, never 0. - For MCP, connect to https://api.scrapeatlas.com/mcp over Streamable HTTP with
Authorization: Bearerand expect 373 tools; the two account tools and failed calls cost 0 credits.
Scrapewise
- Call each paid tool with
quote_only: truefirst, then repeat with the sameidempotency_keyso a retry is charged once - Connect to
https://mcp.scrapewise.ai/mcp?toolsets=outcome,adminto build scrapers; a misspelttoolsetsis ignored silently and leaves the 14 data tools - Use an LLM_READ key unless the task needs paid tools or writes, since LLM_FULL has no per-tool consent
- Treat 402 WALLET_INSUFFICIENT_BALANCE as final and ask the user to top up; on 429 wait for Retry-After, and on 429 cost_exceeded wait for the next hour
- Scrape many addresses with one
scrapewise_run_scraper_url_listcall (up to 5,000) and retry with the same name, never one scraper per address
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, ScrapeAtlas or Scrapewise?
ScrapeAtlas and Scrapewise score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 63 (B) and 62.6 (B). Scrapewise leads on agent ergonomics and maintenance & community.
Do ScrapeAtlas and Scrapewise need an API key?
ScrapeAtlas takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Scrapewise needs an API key.
Can an agent call ScrapeAtlas and Scrapewise without installing anything?
Yes. ScrapeAtlas has a hosted endpoint at https://api.scrapeatlas.com and Scrapewise at https://mcp.scrapewise.ai/mcp.
Other comparisons with ScrapeAtlas or Scrapewise
- Bright Data vs Scrapewise
- Context.dev vs Scrapewise
- Jina Reader vs Scrapewise
- Olostep vs Scrapewise
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrapewise
- Scrape.do vs Scrapewise
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapewise
- Scrapeless vs Scrapewise
- ScraperAPI vs Scrapewise
- Scrapewise vs Scrapfly
- Scrapewise vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrapewise vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapewise vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapewise vs Spider
- Scrapewise vs ZenRows
- Scrapewise vs Zyte API
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapewise
- Context.dev vs ScrapeAtlas
- Diffbot vs ScrapeAtlas
- Diffbot vs Scrapewise
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeAtlas
- jevcrawl vs ScrapeAtlas
- Olostep vs ScrapeAtlas
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScrapeAtlas
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapeGraphAI
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScraperAPI
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapfly
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapingAnt
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapeAtlas vs Spider
- ScrapeAtlas vs ZenRows
- ScrapeAtlas vs Zyte API
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrapewise
- jevcrawl vs Scrapewise
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/scrapeatlas-vs-scrapewise.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/scrapeatlas.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapewise.json - From a terminal
anchor compare scrapeatlas scrapewise(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "scrapeatlas", "b": "scrapewise"}at/mcp, no key