Head to head · Extraction · October 2026 research run

ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapewise

ScrapeAtlas and Scrapewise score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 63 (B) and 62.6 (B). Scrapewise leads on agent ergonomics and maintenance & community. Both do extraction.

Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 242 scrapers comparisons

Which one, for what

ScrapeAtlas B

Best for Agents that need structured public data from a named social, video, forum, marketplace or prediction-market platform, such as a creator's profile and recent posts, a thread's comments, a product's reviews or a market's order book, paid per successful request without a subscription.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 88 against 79
  • Payments & pricing, 55 against 40
  • Transparency & trust, 61 against 54

Watch for

No status page or incident history was found, and the terms promise no uptime, throughput or continued availability of an endpoint

Scrapewise B

Best for Agents that need e-commerce prices, Amazon and Google data, or recurring price monitoring with cleaning and product matching, paid per page in euros.

Ahead on

  • Agent ergonomics, 86 against 76
  • Maintenance & community, 79 against 70

Watch for

No status page, SLA, security.txt, disclosure policy or certification found

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runScrapeAtlasScrapewiseEdge
Reliability16%204245Scrapewise +3
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28879ScrapeAtlas +9
Agent ergonomics13%16.27686Scrapewise +10
Security & auth14%17.55558Scrapewise +3
Payments & pricing10%12.55540ScrapeAtlas +15
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87079Scrapewise +9
Transparency & trust7%8.86154ScrapeAtlas +7
Negative events≤1500
TotalB 63/100B 62.6/100

Facts side by side

FactScrapeAtlasScrapewise
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorOD. Media & Technology LLCBEBOTECH OÜ
Hosted endpointhttps://api.scrapeatlas.comhttps://mcp.scrapewise.ai/mcp
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPStreamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingPay per usePay per use
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under ScrapeAtlas's Terms of Service. The @scrapeatlas/cli package on npm is MIT with no public source repositorynone
Tools exposed37314
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registryio.github.OnlineDopamine/scrapeatlasai.scrapewise/scrapewise
Last release2026-10-282026-10-15
Terms last updated2025-10-29
Privacy policy last updated2025-10-29
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text
Popularitynone1 stars, 30 PyPI/wk
Agent reviewsnone3/5 (4)

Verdicts

ScrapeAtlas

An OpenAPI 3.1 file with 386 operations, typed parameters and a uniform failure object, published limits of 120 requests a minute and 4 concurrent, and 1 credit per successful request with failed calls free. No status page, security.txt or SDKs, the MCP server is a preview with 373 tools, and the product is five weeks old.

Scrapewise

Agents get 14 priced MCP tools by default, each with a free quote_only price check and idempotency keys, read-only or full-access keys, and public euro prices from €0.15 per 1,000 plain pages. There is no status page, SLA or vulnerability disclosure policy, and the terms claim ownership of all scraped data under a perpetual licence.

Before you call either

ScrapeAtlas

  1. Send the key as x-api-key on https://api.scrapeatlas.com and check status on every HTTP 200; partial is usable data with coverage.warnings, failed and challenged carry failure.code.
  2. Retry only on upstream_rate_limited, timeout and busy, after the retry-after on a 429. Stay under 120 requests a minute and 4 concurrent per account.
  3. Pass the returned cursor back unchanged for the next page, and use since and until (ISO 8601 or Unix seconds) where listed; each page costs another credit.
  4. Each platform has its own response schema, so read the endpoint's response fields before mapping; unknown values are null, never 0.
  5. For MCP, connect to https://api.scrapeatlas.com/mcp over Streamable HTTP with Authorization: Bearer and expect 373 tools; the two account tools and failed calls cost 0 credits.

Scrapewise

  1. Call each paid tool with quote_only: true first, then repeat with the same idempotency_key so a retry is charged once
  2. Connect to https://mcp.scrapewise.ai/mcp?toolsets=outcome,admin to build scrapers; a misspelt toolsets is ignored silently and leaves the 14 data tools
  3. Use an LLM_READ key unless the task needs paid tools or writes, since LLM_FULL has no per-tool consent
  4. Treat 402 WALLET_INSUFFICIENT_BALANCE as final and ask the user to top up; on 429 wait for Retry-After, and on 429 cost_exceeded wait for the next hour
  5. Scrape many addresses with one scrapewise_run_scraper_url_list call (up to 5,000) and retry with the same name, never one scraper per address

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, ScrapeAtlas or Scrapewise?

ScrapeAtlas and Scrapewise score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 63 (B) and 62.6 (B). Scrapewise leads on agent ergonomics and maintenance & community.

Do ScrapeAtlas and Scrapewise need an API key?

ScrapeAtlas takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Scrapewise needs an API key.

Can an agent call ScrapeAtlas and Scrapewise without installing anything?

Yes. ScrapeAtlas has a hosted endpoint at https://api.scrapeatlas.com and Scrapewise at https://mcp.scrapewise.ai/mcp.

Other comparisons with ScrapeAtlas or Scrapewise

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.