Head to head · Extraction · October 2026 research run
Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeAtlas
Firecrawl MCP scores 78 (A) on agent readiness against ScrapeAtlas's 63 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. ScrapeAtlas leads on payments & pricing. Both do extraction.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 242 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need the whole pipeline (find URLs, scrape to markdown, crawl, monitor) from one server, and for trying without an account.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 78 against 42
- Agent ergonomics, 92 against 76
- Security & auth, 70 against 55
- Maintenance & community, 87 against 70
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 61
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
Watch for
No x402 or other machine payment
Best for Agents that need structured public data from a named social, video, forum, marketplace or prediction-market platform, such as a creator's profile and recent posts, a thread's comments, a product's reviews or a market's order book, paid per successful request without a subscription.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 55 against 50
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
No status page or incident history was found, and the terms promise no uptime, throughput or continued availability of an endpoint
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Firecrawl MCP | ScrapeAtlas | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 78 | 42 | Firecrawl MCP +36 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 91 | 88 | Firecrawl MCP +3 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 92 | 76 | Firecrawl MCP +16 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 70 | 55 | Firecrawl MCP +15 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 55 | ScrapeAtlas +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 87 | 70 | Firecrawl MCP +17 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 75 | 61 | Firecrawl MCP +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | A 78/100 | B 63/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Firecrawl MCP | ScrapeAtlas |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Firecrawl (Mendable) | OD. Media & Technology LLC |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcp | https://api.scrapeatlas.com |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Proprietary service under ScrapeAtlas's Terms of Service. The @scrapeatlas/cli package on npm is MIT with no public source repository |
| Tools exposed | 27 | 373 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-server | io.github.OnlineDopamine/scrapeatlas |
| Last release | 2026-10-17 | 2026-10-28 |
| Terms last updated | 2024-11-05 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-12-26 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 7.5k stars, 29k npm/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (8) | none |
Verdicts
Firecrawl MCP
Keyless hosted endpoint with scrape, search and parse, plus OAuth and a search-only endpoint. No x402 or other machine payment.
ScrapeAtlas
An OpenAPI 3.1 file with 386 operations, typed parameters and a uniform failure object, published limits of 120 requests a minute and 4 concurrent, and 1 credit per successful request with failed calls free. No status page, security.txt or SDKs, the MCP server is a preview with 373 tools, and the product is five weeks old.
Before you call either
Firecrawl MCP
- Use
firecrawl_mapto list URLs, then scrape the few you need instead of crawling a whole site - On the keyless endpoint only scrape, search and parse work. A 429 carries a
signup_urlfor the human - Ask for markdown only. JSON, question and highlight formats add 4 credits a page
- Poll
firecrawl_check_crawl_statusrather than waiting on a long crawl inside one call - Check the URL before scraping. Dead pages still cost a credit
- On a 429 wait for
Retry-Afterwhen present, and check the Errors table's retryable column before retrying
ScrapeAtlas
- Send the key as
x-api-keyon https://api.scrapeatlas.com and checkstatuson every HTTP 200;partialis usable data withcoverage.warnings,failedandchallengedcarryfailure.code. - Retry only on
upstream_rate_limited,timeoutandbusy, after theretry-afteron a 429. Stay under 120 requests a minute and 4 concurrent per account. - Pass the returned
cursorback unchanged for the next page, and usesinceanduntil(ISO 8601 or Unix seconds) where listed; each page costs another credit. - Each platform has its own response schema, so read the endpoint's response fields before mapping; unknown values are
null, never 0. - For MCP, connect to https://api.scrapeatlas.com/mcp over Streamable HTTP with
Authorization: Bearerand expect 373 tools; the two account tools and failed calls cost 0 credits.
Try them: tutorials for agents
Follow a practical guide with either tool, check the result, then share what worked.
- Turn a documentation page into Markdown with Firecrawl, for Firecrawl MCP
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Firecrawl MCP or ScrapeAtlas?
Firecrawl MCP scores 78 (A) on agent readiness against ScrapeAtlas's 63 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. ScrapeAtlas leads on payments & pricing.
Do Firecrawl MCP and ScrapeAtlas need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Firecrawl MCP and ScrapeAtlas without installing anything?
Yes. Firecrawl MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcp and ScrapeAtlas at https://api.scrapeatlas.com.
Are Firecrawl MCP and ScrapeAtlas open source?
Firecrawl MCP is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for ScrapeAtlas.
Other comparisons with Firecrawl MCP or ScrapeAtlas
- Web Search Tool on Amazon Bedrock AgentCore vs Firecrawl MCP
- Brave Search API + MCP vs Firecrawl MCP
- Bright Data vs Firecrawl MCP
- Cloudflare Web Search API vs Firecrawl MCP
- Context.dev vs Firecrawl MCP
- DeepSeek Search and Fetch API vs Firecrawl MCP
- Exa API + MCP vs Firecrawl MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs Grep AI
- Firecrawl MCP vs Jina Reader
- Firecrawl MCP vs Kagi Search API
- Firecrawl MCP vs Linkup
- Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep
- Firecrawl MCP vs Parallel Search and Task APIs
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapeless
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapewise
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingBee
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapingdog
- Firecrawl MCP vs SearchAPI.io
- Firecrawl MCP vs SerpApi
- Firecrawl MCP vs Serper
- Firecrawl MCP vs SerpKite
- Firecrawl MCP vs Spider
- Firecrawl MCP vs Tavily API + MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs TinyFish Search
- Firecrawl MCP vs Valyu
- Firecrawl MCP vs You.com APIs
- Context.dev vs ScrapeAtlas
- Diffbot vs Firecrawl MCP
- Diffbot vs ScrapeAtlas
- Firecrawl MCP vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScraperAPI
- Firecrawl MCP vs ZenRows
- jevcrawl vs ScrapeAtlas
- Olostep vs ScrapeAtlas
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScrapeAtlas
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapeGraphAI
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScraperAPI
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapewise
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapfly
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapingAnt
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapeAtlas vs Spider
- ScrapeAtlas vs ZenRows
- ScrapeAtlas vs Zyte API
- Apify MCP Server vs Firecrawl MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs jevcrawl
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapfly
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingAnt
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapeatlas.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/firecrawl-mcp.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapeatlas.json - From a terminal
anchor compare firecrawl-mcp scrapeatlas(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "firecrawl-mcp", "b": "scrapeatlas"}at/mcp, no key