Head to head · Web search · October 2026 research run

Firecrawl MCP vs Tavily API + MCP

Tavily API + MCP has a score of 77.2 (BB) against Firecrawl MCP's 75.5 (BB). Both do web search. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 25 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Firecrawl MCP for

  • agent ergonomics (+11)
  • security & auth (+15)
  • transparency & trust (+11)

Pick Tavily API + MCP for

  • reliability (+20)
  • payments & pricing (+25)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runFirecrawl MCPTavily API + MCPEdge
Reliability16%207090Tavily API + MCP +20
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28889Tavily API + MCP +1
Agent ergonomics13%16.29281Firecrawl MCP +11
Security & auth14%17.56752Firecrawl MCP +15
Payments & pricing10%12.55075Tavily API + MCP +25
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88785Firecrawl MCP +2
Transparency & trust7%8.87665Firecrawl MCP +11
Negative events≤1500
Total75.5 · BB77.2 · BB

Facts side by side

FactFirecrawl MCPTavily API + MCP
KindMCP serverMCP server
VendorFirecrawl (Mendable)Tavily
Hosted endpointhttps://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcphttps://mcp.tavily.com/mcp/?tavilyApiKey=<key>
Transportsstdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy)stdio, Streamable HTTP, HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nopayer tooling only
LicenceMITMIT
Tools exposed266
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registryio.github.firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-serverio.github.tavily-ai/tavily-mcp
Last release2026-10-012026-09-18
Popularity7.5k stars, 29k npm/wk2.4k stars, 452k npm/wk, 1.6M PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3.5/5 (8)3.6/5 (8)

Verdicts

Firecrawl MCP

Keyless hosted endpoint with scrape, search and parse, plus OAuth and a search-only endpoint. No x402 or other machine payment.

Tavily API + MCP

Keyless search and extract, plus a free 1,000 credits a month with no card. x402 covers advanced search only, not extract, map, crawl or research.

Before you call either

Firecrawl MCP

  1. Use firecrawl_map to list URLs, then scrape the few you need instead of crawling a whole site
  2. On the keyless endpoint only scrape, search and parse work. A 429 carries a signup_url for the human
  3. Ask for markdown only. JSON, question and highlight formats add 4 credits a page
  4. Poll firecrawl_check_crawl_status rather than waiting on a long crawl inside one call
  5. Check the URL before scraping. Dead pages still cost a credit

Tavily API + MCP

  1. Try X-Tavily-Access-Mode: keyless first for search and extract, then switch to a key or x402 when the limit hits
  2. Send the key in Authorization: Bearer, not ?tavilyApiKey= in the MCP URL
  3. On 429, wait for Retry-After. A 432 or 433 means a spend limit, and retrying won't help
  4. Run /map before /crawl to bound the crawl, since crawl is billed as map plus extract
  5. Research is async and runs 4 to 250 credits. Create the task, then poll /research/{request_id}

Other comparisons with Firecrawl MCP or Tavily API + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.