Head to head · Extraction · October 2026 research run
Firecrawl MCP vs ScraperAPI
Firecrawl MCP scores 75.3 (BB) on agent readiness against ScraperAPI's 52.1 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do extraction.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 167 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Good for Agents that need the whole pipeline (find URLs, scrape to markdown, crawl, monitor) from one server, and for trying without an account.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 45
- Schema & documentation, 88 against 67
- Agent ergonomics, 92 against 74
- Security & auth, 67 against 29
- Payments & pricing, 50 against 40
- Maintenance & community, 87 against 61
- Transparency & trust, 74 against 54
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Open source
Watch for
No x402 or other machine payment
Good for Agents that want a single GET to fetch pages through proxies, with parsed JSON for Amazon, Google, Walmart, eBay and Redfin and a batch API of up to 50,000 URLs.
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
No status page is linked from the home, pricing, support or docs pages, although the pricing page lists a 99.9% uptime guarantee
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Firecrawl MCP | ScraperAPI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 45 | Firecrawl MCP +25 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 88 | 67 | Firecrawl MCP +21 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 92 | 74 | Firecrawl MCP +18 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 67 | 29 | Firecrawl MCP +38 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 40 | Firecrawl MCP +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 87 | 61 | Firecrawl MCP +26 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 74 | 54 | Firecrawl MCP +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 75.3 · BB | 52.1 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Firecrawl MCP | ScraperAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Firecrawl (Mendable) | ScraperAPI (saas.group) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcp | https://api.scraperapi.com |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | none |
| Tools exposed | 26 | 28 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-server | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-08-07 |
| Terms last updated | 2024-11-05 | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-12-26 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 7.5k stars, 29k npm/wk | 5 stars |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (8) | none |
Verdicts
Firecrawl MCP
Keyless hosted endpoint with scrape, search and parse, plus OAuth and a search-only endpoint. No x402 or other machine payment.
ScraperAPI
One GET request with a key and a URL returns a page, and the MCP server's 28 tools carry read-only and destructive hints. No status page, OpenAPI file, security.txt or certification was found, and the documented default puts the API key in the URL query string.
Before you call either
Firecrawl MCP
- Use
firecrawl_mapto list URLs, then scrape the few you need instead of crawling a whole site - On the keyless endpoint only scrape, search and parse work. A 429 carries a
signup_urlfor the human - Ask for markdown only. JSON, question and highlight formats add 4 credits a page
- Poll
firecrawl_check_crawl_statusrather than waiting on a long crawl inside one call - Check the URL before scraping. Dead pages still cost a credit
ScraperAPI
- Set the client timeout to 70 seconds. The API retries for that long before it returns 500, and a request cancelled earlier is still charged
- Send the key as the
x-sapi-api_keyheader to keep it out of URLs and logs - Pass
max_coston each request, or call/account/urlcostfirst, because domain and anti-bot surcharges vary from 1 to 75 credits - Use
output_format=markdownortextto cut response size, andautoparse=trueonly on supported domains - On 429 reduce concurrency to the plan limit (5 on Free, 20 on Hobby). The request is rejected, not queued
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Firecrawl MCP or ScraperAPI?
Firecrawl MCP scores 75.3 (BB) on agent readiness against ScraperAPI's 52.1 (D), and leads in every scored category.
Do Firecrawl MCP and ScraperAPI need an API key?
Firecrawl MCP takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. ScraperAPI needs an API key.
Can an agent call Firecrawl MCP and ScraperAPI without installing anything?
Yes. Firecrawl MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcp and ScraperAPI at https://api.scraperapi.com.
Are Firecrawl MCP and ScraperAPI open source?
Firecrawl MCP is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for ScraperAPI.
Other comparisons with Firecrawl MCP or ScraperAPI
- Brave Search API + MCP vs Firecrawl MCP
- Bright Data vs Firecrawl MCP
- Cloudflare Web Search API vs Firecrawl MCP
- Exa API + MCP vs Firecrawl MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs Grep AI
- Firecrawl MCP vs Jina Reader
- Firecrawl MCP vs Kagi Search API
- Firecrawl MCP vs Linkup
- Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep
- Firecrawl MCP vs Parallel Search and Task APIs
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapeless
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingBee
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapingdog
- Firecrawl MCP vs SearchAPI.io
- Firecrawl MCP vs SerpApi
- Firecrawl MCP vs Serper
- Firecrawl MCP vs SerpKite
- Firecrawl MCP vs Spider
- Firecrawl MCP vs Tavily API + MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs TinyFish Search
- Firecrawl MCP vs Valyu
- Firecrawl MCP vs You.com APIs
- Bright Data vs ScraperAPI
- Jina Reader vs ScraperAPI
- Olostep vs ScraperAPI
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScraperAPI
- Scrape.do vs ScraperAPI
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ScraperAPI
- Scrapeless vs ScraperAPI
- ScraperAPI vs Scrapfly
- ScraperAPI vs ScrapingAnt
- ScraperAPI vs ScrapingBee
- ScraperAPI vs Scrapingdog
- ScraperAPI vs Spider
- ScraperAPI vs ZenRows
- ScraperAPI vs Zyte API
- Diffbot vs Firecrawl MCP
- Diffbot vs ScraperAPI
- Firecrawl MCP vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Firecrawl MCP vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapfly
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingAnt
- Apify MCP Server vs Firecrawl MCP
- Apify MCP Server vs ScraperAPI
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scraperapi.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/firecrawl-mcp.json·/api/v1/tools/scraperapi.json - From a terminal
anchor compare firecrawl-mcp scraperapi(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "firecrawl-mcp", "b": "scraperapi"}at/mcp, no key